Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

“COPERSUCAR”

Decision of the Superior Court of Justice of Brazil (Superior Tribunal de Justiça) 25 May 2021 – Case No. 1.837.219 – SP (2019/0082015-3)

  • Decision • Plant Variety Protection
  • Brazil
  • Published:
IIC - International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law Aims and scope Submit manuscript
  1. 1.

    As the Brazilian Law for the Protection of Plant Varieties does not regulate the limitation period for actions for the collection of royalties and does not provide for any other fallback regulation, the Civil Code applies.

  2. 2.

    However, this does not mean that the general limitation period of the Civil Code (Art. 205) should be applied, but rather that the regulations of the Civil Code must be applied. It is only where there is no specific rule in the Civil Code that the general ten-year period will apply.

  3. 3.

    The licensing agreement must describe the object and the limits of the use authorisation, the form of calculation and the method of payment of the consideration.

  4. 4.

    There is more than one way of calculating the value of the consideration for use of a plant variety: taking into account the duration of use, the area planted, or the volume, which may be in units, kilograms or litres. In the latter cases, settlement of the obligation will depend on the information provided by the licensee regarding the quantities used to make up the amount due under the agreement.

  5. 5.

    Claims for collection of net debts resulting from a private instrument lapse after the five-year period set out in Art. 206(5)(I) of the Civil Code.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Author information

Consortia

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Translated from the Portuguese by Gwyneth Little. Headnotes partially taken from the official summary of the decision.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

COPERSUCAR – Cooperativa de Produtores de Cana-de-Aҫúcar, Aҫúcar e Álcool do Estado de São Paulo [Cooperative of producers of sugar cane, sugar and alcohol of the State of São Paulo] v. Sabarálcool S/A Aҫúcar e Álcool Civil Code, Arts. 205, 206(5)(I); Law No. 9.456/1997 for the Protection of Plant Varieties. “COPERSUCAR”. IIC 53, 624–627 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40319-022-01188-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40319-022-01188-5

Keywords

Navigation