Skip to main content
Log in

“Gemata v. Bergi and others”

Decision of the Supreme Court (Corte Suprema di Cassazione Sez. I) 16 September 2019 – Case No. 22984

  • Decision • Patent Law
  • Italy
  • Published:
IIC - International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law Aims and scope Submit manuscript
  1. 1.

    A decision by the Enlarged Board of Appeal of the European Patent Office that is under revision is not final even though the request for revision does not have suspensive effects. Therefore, such a decision cannot serve as the grounds for the discontinuance of an action of invalidity of an Italian patent, because this only proceeds when the legal grounds for the action no longer exist. This can only occur when there is a final decision on a related matter.

  2. 2.

    When a European patent is revoked, the Italian patent does not automatically become invalid, because the latter is an autonomous right.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Author information

Consortia

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Translated by Giulia Schneider.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Italian Code of Civil Procedure, Art. 360(3); Italian Code of Intellectual Property, Art. 59. “Gemata v. Bergi and others”. IIC 51, 647–650 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40319-020-00943-w

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40319-020-00943-w

Keywords

Navigation