Skip to main content
Log in

“Le Point – Marianne”

Decision of the Supreme Court (Cour de cassation) 22 May 2019 – Case No. 18-12.718 (ECLI:FR:CCASS:2019:C100469)

  • Decision • Copyright Law
  • France
  • Published:
IIC - International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law Aims and scope Submit manuscript

According to Art. L122-5, 4° of the Intellectual Property Code, the author cannot prohibit parody, pastiche and caricature, observing the rules of the genre. The notion of “parody”, in the sense of Art. 5(3)(k) of Directive 2001/29/, is an autonomous concept of EU law and is not subject to the conditions according to which a parody should mention the source of the parodied work or relate to the original work itself.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Notes

  1. The invented word ‘lepéno-cégétistes’ alludes to persons supporting Marine Le Pen (leader of the French extreme right political party) and the CGT [seʒete] (one of France’s largest labour unions).

Author information

Consortia

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Translated by Oleksandr Bulayenko.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Intellectual Property Code, Arts. L111-1, L112-1; European Convention on Human Rights, Art. 10(2) combined with its First Additional Protocol, Art. 1; Directive 2001/29/EC, Art. 5(3)(k). “Le Point – Marianne”. IIC 51, 386–388 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40319-020-00920-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40319-020-00920-3

Keywords

Navigation