Skip to main content

“Mission Product Holdings”

Decision of the Supreme Court 20 May 2019 – Case No. 17–1657

  1. 1.

    Under § 365, a debtor’s rejection of an executory contract in bankruptcy has the same effect as a breach outside bankruptcy. Such an act cannot rescind rights that the contract previously granted.

  2. 2.

    The debtor-licensor’s rejection of that contract does not deprive the licensee of its rights to use the trademark. A rejection breaches a contract but does not rescind it and that means all the rights that would ordinarily survive a contract breach remain in place.

    1. a.

      § 365(g) provides that rejection “constitutes a breach of [an executory] contract”. “Breach” is neither a defined nor a specialized bankruptcy term − it means in the Code what it means in contract law outside bankruptcy.

    2. b.

      Outside bankruptcy, a licensor’s breach cannot revoke continuing rights given to a counterparty under a contract (assuming no special contract term or state law). Because rejection “constitutes a breach,” the same result must follow from rejection in bankruptcy. In preserving a counterparty’s rights, § 365 reflects the general bankruptcy rule that the estate cannot possess anything more than the debtor did outside bankruptcy. And conversely, allowing rejection to rescind a counterparty’s rights would circumvent the Code’s stringent limits on “avoidance” actions − the exceptional cases in which debtors may unwind pre-bankruptcy transfers that undermine the bankruptcy process.

Author information


Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Available at

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mission Product Holdings, Inc. v. Tempnology, LLC, NKA Old Cold LLC Bankruptcy Code, § 365. “Mission Product Holdings”. IIC 50, 879 (2019).

Download citation


  • Trademarks
  • Bankruptcy
  • Rejection as contract rescission vs rejection as contract breach
  • Debtor’s rejection of a licencing contract
  • Transfer of rights