Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

“Telmisartan”

Decision of the Constitutional Court 24 May 2017 – Case No. 251/2017

  • Decision • Patent Law
  • Portugal
  • Published:
IIC - International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law Aims and scope Submit manuscript
  1. 1.

    The interpretatively extractable rule of Art. 2 of Law No. 62/2011, dated 12 December, and Arts. 35(1) and 101(2) of the Industrial Property Code, which establishes that, in the case of a mandatory arbitration established under Law No. 62/2011, dated 12 December, a party cannot be defended by exception by invoking the invalidity of a patent with inter partes effects, is unconstitutional because it disproportionately affects the right to judicial defense.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Author information

Consortia

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Translated by Nuno Sousa e Silva.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

A. & CO.KG and B., Lda. v. C. K.S and D. B.V Law No. 62/2011 of December 12, Art. 2; Industrial Property Code, Arts. 35(1), 101(2); Constitution, Arts. 18(2), 20. “Telmisartan”. IIC 50, 376–388 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40319-019-00803-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40319-019-00803-2

Keywords

Navigation