Advertisement

The New Legal Framework for Acquiring “Well-Known” Status in China: Signalling a More Coherent Phase of Enhanced Trade Mark Protection?

  • Kaiyu Xiao
  • Claus Barrett Christiansen
  • Matthew J. Elsmore
Article
  • 107 Downloads

Abstract

In China there is a new legal framework governing the determination of “well-known” trade mark status. In this article, we identify several substantive and procedural innovations as regards the new rules, as well as drawing attention to attendant Chinese peculiarities that are also worthy of attention. Our legal analysis comprises a mix of positive and constructive critiques of current Chinese trade mark law and practice, and reveals that to understand the rules regarding well-known status demands close examination of the institutional setup in China. The article’s aim is to detail the new provisions and to address whether the new legal framework signals, overall, a more coherent phase of Chinese trade mark law ahead for determining and concluding well-known trade mark status in China.

Keywords

China Well-known trade mark New trade mark law and practice Determining and concluding well-known status 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to Professor Peter K. Yu, Professor of Law, Co-Director of the Center for Law and Intellectual Property of Texas A&M University School of Law, for providing valuable comments on the original manuscript. We are also most grateful for the helpful feedback from the IIC review process on earlier drafts of this article.

References

  1. An Q (2015) Well-known marks & China’s system of well-known mark protection. Int Trademark Assoc 95(3):705–772Google Scholar
  2. Chong S (2005) Protection of famous trademarks against use for unrelated goods and services: a comparative analysis of the law in the United States, the United Kingdom and Canada and recommendations for Canadian law reform. Trademark Rep 95(3):642–643Google Scholar
  3. Christiansen CB (2014) New Chinese trademark law enters into force on May 1, 2014. http://dcbf.dk/news/235-new-chinese-trademark-law-enters-into-force-on-may-1-2014. Accessed 6 May 2016
  4. Feng P (2000) Protection of well-known marks in China. In: Heath C, Liu (eds) The protection of well-known marks in Asia. Kluwer Law International, LondonGoogle Scholar
  5. Ganea P, Pattloch T, Heath C (2005) Intellectual property law in China. Kluwer Law International, LondonGoogle Scholar
  6. Gao Z (2011) Trademark law and litigation in China. J Asia Pac Bus 12(1):43–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hong L (2009) “China’s Dilution of the Dilution Doctrine” World Trademark Review April/May, pp 24, 27Google Scholar
  8. Janis MD, Yu PK (2008) International and comparative aspects of trademark dilution. Transnatl Law Contemp Probl 17:603–609Google Scholar
  9. Kong X [孔祥俊] (2013) Chi ming shang biao si fa bao hu de hui gu yu zhan wang [Retrospect and Prospect of Judicial Protection on Well-known Trademarks 驰名商标司法保护的回顾与展望]. Ren min si fa [The People’s Judicature人民司法] 1:52–53Google Scholar
  10. Kossof P (2013) Chinese national well-known trademarks and local famous trademarks in light of the 2013 trademark law: status, effect, and adequacy. John Marshall Rev Intellect Prop Law 13:225–250Google Scholar
  11. Kur A, Dreier T (2013) European intellectual property law: text, cases and materials. Edward Elgar, CheltenhamGoogle Scholar
  12. Liebman BL (2009) Assessing China’s legal reforms. Colum J Asian Law 23(1):18Google Scholar
  13. Lim A (2009) Protection of trademark rights in China—an update. http://www.marques.org/monthly/200909/China%20Trademark%20Rights.pdf. Accessed 4 May 2016
  14. Liu L [刘莉] (2016) Dui she wai ding pai jia gong shang biao qin quan ren ding de zai si kao [对涉外定牌加工商标侵权认定的再思考, Rethink on Trademark Infringement Determination in OEM]. Ren min si fa·an li [人民司法·案例, The People’s Judicature·Cases] 11:90–91Google Scholar
  15. Liu K, Wang E, Tao X (2009) The use and misuse of well-known marks listings. IIC 40(6):685–697Google Scholar
  16. Llewelyn D (2015) A Perspective from Asia: Special Protection for Luxury Brands—Legal Sense or Nonsense? In: Sun H, Beebe B, Sunder M (eds) The luxury economy and intellectual property: critical reflections. OUP, Oxford, pp 290–301Google Scholar
  17. Long C, Wang J (2015) Judicial local protectionism in China: an empirical study of IP cases. Int Rev Law Econ 42(C):48–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Luo JB, Ghosh S (2008) Protection and enforcement of well-known mark rights in China: history, theory, and future. ExpressO. http://works.bepress.com/shubha_ghosh/3/. Accessed 6 May 2016
  19. Pudong Huanya Locker Co., Ltd v. Focker Security Products International Ltd (2014) min ti zi di 38 hao. IIC 47(5):629. doi: 10.1007/s40319-016-0494-5 Google Scholar
  20. Shao K (2005) Look at my sign! Trademarks in China from antiquity to the early modern times. J Pat Trademark Off Soc 87:654–682Google Scholar
  21. Sun H (2016) Hermes in the lost (luxury) paradise: how to secure enhanced well-known trademark protection in China. EIPR 38(2):104Google Scholar
  22. Swamidass JS, Swamidasst PM (2014) The trajectory of China’s trademark systems leading up to the new trademark law taking effect in May 2014. J Pat Trademark Off Soc 96:56–75Google Scholar
  23. Tao X [陶鑫良] (2009) Wo guo chi ming shang biao ren ding yu bao de hu xian Zhuang fen xi ji fa lv gui zhi [Analysis on the Status Quo of Well-known Trademark Determination and Protection and the Legal Regulation我国驰名商标认定与保护的现状分析及其法律规制]. 2009 Zhong hua quan guo lv shi xie hui zhi shi chan quan zhuan ye wei yuan hui ji zhong guo lv shi zhi shi chan quan gao ceng lun tan lun wen ji (shang) [2009 China Lawyer Association IPR Committee and Chinese Lawyer IPR Summit Forum 2009中华全国律师协会知识产权专业委员会年会暨中国律师知识产权高层论坛论文集 (上)]:260–270Google Scholar
  24. Wang C, Zhang X (eds) (1997) Introduction to Chinese law. Sweet and Maxwell Asia, Hong Kong, p 442Google Scholar
  25. Xia J [夏君丽] (2007) Guan yu chi ming shang biao si fa bao hu jia zhi qu xiang ji zhi du she zhi de si kao [Contemplations on the Valuation Orientation and System Establishment with Respect to the Judicial Protection of Well-known Marks 关于驰名商标司法保护价值取向及制度设置的思考]. fa lv shi yong [J Law Appl 法律适用] 12:3Google Scholar
  26. Ye R [叶若思], Luo J [罗剑青], Zhu J [祝建军], Sun H [孙虹] (2008) Chi min shang biao si fa ren ding de li lun yu shen pan shi jian [Theory and Judicial Practice on Judicial Determination of Well-known Trademarks, 驰名商标司法认定的理论与审判实践]. Zhong hua shang biao [China Trademark 中华商标] 11:161–186Google Scholar
  27. Yi J [易健雄] (2009) OEM shang biao qin quan jiu fen chu li d tai du xuan ze. Zhi shi chan quan [OEM商标侵权纠纷处理的态度选择 Choosing between trademark infringement or not in OEM]. Zhi shi chan quan [知识产权Intellectual Property] 3:23Google Scholar
  28. Yu PK (2007) Causes of piracy and counterfeiting in China. The China Letter, GuanxiGoogle Scholar
  29. Zhang N (2012) The evolution of trade mark law in China. Queen Mary J Intellect Prop 2(3):279–287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Zhang M, Zwier JP (2003) Burden of proof: developments in modern Chinese evidence rules. Tulsa J Comp Int Law 10(419):422Google Scholar
  31. Zhang W, Wei L, Li Y (2014) The third revision of Chinese trademark law—analysis and comment. Int Rev Intellect Prop Compet Law (IIC) 45(5):556–586CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Max Planck Institute for Innovation and Competition, Munich 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kaiyu Xiao
    • 1
  • Claus Barrett Christiansen
    • 2
  • Matthew J. Elsmore
    • 3
  1. 1.Aarhus UniversityAarhusDenmark
  2. 2.Bech-Bruun Law FirmAarhusDenmark
  3. 3.Aarhus UniversityAarhusDenmark

Personalised recommendations