Beyond the Cover Story – An Enquiry into the EU Competence to Introduce a Right for Publishers

Article

Abstract

This paper examines the competence of the EU to introduce a neighbouring right for publishers (including a neighbouring right for press publishers, also called “ancillary copyright”). The assessment of competence is carried out following a step-by-step approach, which involves an analysis of the applicable Treaty norms and an assessment of subsidiarity and proportionality.

Keywords

Copyright European Union Lawmaking Publishers Ancillary copyright Neighbouring rights 

References

  1. Alexy R (2010) A theory of constitutional rights. OUP, Oxford, p 398Google Scholar
  2. Barber NW (2005) The limited modesty of subsidiarity. Eur Law J 11(3):311–312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Computer & Communications Industry Association (2015) Understanding ‘ancillary copyright’ in the global intellectual property environment (white paper), p 2. http://www.ccianet.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/CCIA-Understanding-Ancillary-Copyright.pdf. Accessed 12 Sept 2016
  4. de Búrca G (1993) The Principle of Proportionality and its Application in EC Law. Yearb of Eur Law 13(1):105–150 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. de Vries SA (2006) Tensions within the internal market: the functioning of the internal market and the development of horizontal and flanking policies. Europa Law Publishing, Cheltenham, p 18Google Scholar
  6. European Copyright Society (2016) Answer to the EC Consultation on the role of publishers in the copyright value chain, p 5. http://ivir00.websites.xs4all.nl/wp-content/uploads/2000/05/235-1-1.pdf. Accessed 24 Aug 2016
  7. Geiger C (2009) Copyright’s fundamental rights dimension at EU level. In: Derclaye E (ed) Research handbook on the future of EU copyright. Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, p 38Google Scholar
  8. Groussot X (2006) General principles of community law. Europa Law Publishing, Groningen, pp 146–152Google Scholar
  9. Groussot X, Bogojević S (2014) Subsidiarity as a procedural safeguard of federalism. In: Azoulai L (ed) The question of competence in the European Union. OUP, Oxford, pp 242–243Google Scholar
  10. Guastaferro B (2012) Beyond the exceptionalism of constitutional conflicts: the ordinary functions of the identity clause. Yearb Eur Law 31(1):263–318Google Scholar
  11. Hugenholtz PB (2009a) The last frontier: territoriality. In: van Eechoud M et al (eds) Harmonizing European copyright law. The challenges of better lawmaking. Kluwer Law International, Dordrecht, p 307Google Scholar
  12. Hugenholtz PB (2009b) The blessing and curses of harmonization. In: van Eechoud M et al (eds) Harmonizing European copyright law. The challenges of better lawmaking. Kluwer Law International, Dordrecht, p 299Google Scholar
  13. Jans JH (2000) Proportionality revisited. Legal Issues Econ Integr 27(3):240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kucharczyk J (2015) A ‘legal’ snippet in Germany could mean … seven words, maximum. http://www.project-disco.org/intellectual-property/102715-a-legal-snippet-in-germany-could-mean-seven-words-maximum/#.V72drqKx649. Accessed 24 Aug 2016
  15. Kurschus S (2015) European book cultures. Diversity as a challenge. Springer, Berlin, p 28Google Scholar
  16. Lohse EJ (2011) The meaning of harmonization in the context of european union law—a process in need of definition. In: Andenas M, Andersen CB (eds) Theory and practice of harmonisation. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp 288–289Google Scholar
  17. Media Group Turku School of Economics & Rightscom Ltd (2005) Publishing market watch, p 62. http://ec.europa.eu/information_society/media_taskforce/doc/pmw_20050127.pdf
  18. Millet FX (2014) The respect for national constitutional identity in the European legal space. In: Azoulai L (ed) The question of competence in the European Union. OUP, Oxford, pp 262–264Google Scholar
  19. Möllers C (2010) Pouvoir Constituant-Constitution-Constitutionalisation. In: von Bogdandy A, Bast J (eds) Principles of European constitutional law. Hart, Oxford, p 189Google Scholar
  20. Newman N et al (2016) Reuters digital news report 2016. http://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/sites/default/files/Digital-News-Report-2016.pdf. Accessed 12 Sept 2016
  21. Podszun R (2013) Searching the future of newspapers: with a little help from Google and IP law? Int Rev Intellect Prop Compet Law 44(3):260Google Scholar
  22. Posada de la Concha P, Gutiérrez Garcia A, Hernández Cobos H (2015) Impacto del nuevo Artículo 32.2 de la Ley de Propiedad Intelectual, pp 42–43. http://www.aeepp.com/pdf/InformeNera.pdf. Accessed 24 Aug 2016
  23. Psychogiopoulou E (2013) State aid to the press in the EU: legal issues and trends. In: Murschetz P (ed) State aid for newspapers. Theories, cases, actions. Springer, Berlin, pp 89–90, 95Google Scholar
  24. Ramalho A (2014) Conceptualising the European Union’s competence in copyright—what can the EU do? Int Rev Intellect Prop Compet Law 45(2):178, 183Google Scholar
  25. Ramalho A (2016) The competence of the European Union in copyright lawmaking. In: A normative perspective of EU powers for copyright harmonisation Springer, Switzerland, p. 83 Google Scholar
  26. Rauer N (2015) Austrian copyright reform: no ancillary copyright for publishers. http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=6dbc1b40-8315-4ac9-b122-b3d0523da0ad. Accessed 24 Aug 2016
  27. Rosati E (2016) Neighbouring rights for publishers: are national and (possible) EU initiatives lawful?, pp 4–5. http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2798628. Accessed 24 Aug 2016
  28. Schütze R (2014) Limits to the Union’s ‘internal market’ competence. In: Azoulai L (ed) The question of competence in the European Union. OUP, Oxford, p 228Google Scholar
  29. Spindler G, Schuster F (2015) Recht der elektronischen Medien. C.H. Beck, Munich, pp 2351–2360Google Scholar
  30. Wyatt D (2009) Community competence to regulate the internal market. In: Dougan M, Currie S (eds) 50 years of European treaties. Hart, Oxford, p 120Google Scholar
  31. Xalabarder R (2014) The remunerated statutory limitation for news aggregation and search engines proposed by the Spanish government; its compliance with international and EU law, p 7. http://infojustice.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/xalabarder.pdf. Accessed 24 Aug 2014

Copyright information

© Max Planck Institute for Innovation and Competition, Munich 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Maastricht UniversityMaastrichtThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations