Skip to main content

“Air Cap System” (Luftkappensystem)

Decision of the Federal Supreme Court (Bundesgerichtshof) 13 October 2015 – Case No. X ZR 74/14

  1. 1.

    If, in a patent specification, two measures that differ only in degree (here: blocking and restriction of an air flow) are named without detailed differentiation as the starting point for a problem arising in the state of the art, then it cannot without further justification be concluded from the fact that only the measure with the stronger effect (here: blocking) is mentioned in the patent claim that the measure with weaker effect is not sufficient to embody the protected teaching.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Author information

Consortia

Additional information

Official headnotes.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

European Patent Convention, Art. 69; Patent Act, Sec. 14. “Air Cap System” (Luftkappensystem). IIC 47, 843–847 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40319-016-0516-3

Download citation

Keywords

  • Patent specification
  • Semantic content of a patent claim
  • Measures differing in degree
  • Linguistic, logical-scientific and technical interpretation
  • Prevelance of technical meaning