Skip to main content
Log in

“Air Cap System” (Luftkappensystem)

Decision of the Federal Supreme Court (Bundesgerichtshof) 13 October 2015 – Case No. X ZR 74/14

  • Decision • Patent Law
  • Germany
  • Published:
IIC - International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law Aims and scope Submit manuscript
  1. 1.

    If, in a patent specification, two measures that differ only in degree (here: blocking and restriction of an air flow) are named without detailed differentiation as the starting point for a problem arising in the state of the art, then it cannot without further justification be concluded from the fact that only the measure with the stronger effect (here: blocking) is mentioned in the patent claim that the measure with weaker effect is not sufficient to embody the protected teaching.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Author information

Consortia

Additional information

Official headnotes.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

European Patent Convention, Art. 69; Patent Act, Sec. 14. “Air Cap System” (Luftkappensystem). IIC 47, 843–847 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40319-016-0516-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40319-016-0516-3

Keywords

Navigation