Skip to main content
Log in

“BSA/DSA”

Decision of the Federal Supreme Court (Bundesgerichtshof) 9 July 2015 – Case No. I ZB 16/14

  • Decision • Trade Mark Law
  • Germany
  • Published:
IIC - International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law Aims and scope Submit manuscript
  1. a)

    The principle that similarity of signs establishing a risk of confusion cannot be assumed merely due to a similarity in a component not eligible for protection is not readily and unrestrictedly transferable to a situation in which the ineligible component which could potentially give rise to a conflict is contained not in the petitioning or opposing trade mark, but in the contested trade mark.

  2. b)

    A component of a contested combined mark that is not eligible for protection can have a distinctive and thus conflict-establishing effect if this component, though recognised by the public as descriptive, is perceived as the dominant element due to its special graphic presentation because other, eligible components are lacking in the combined mark.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Author information

Consortia

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Trade Mark Act, Sec. 9(1), No. 2. “BSA/DSA”. IIC 47, 738–742 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40319-016-0503-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40319-016-0503-8

Keywords

Navigation