Skip to main content
Log in

“Sparkassen-Red”

Decision of the European Court of Justice (Third Chamber) 19 June 2014 – Case Nos. C-217/13 and C-218/13

  • Decision • Trade mark Law
  • European Union
  • Published:
IIC - International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law Aims and scope Submit manuscript
  1. 1.

    Article 3(1) and (3) of Directive 2008/95/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 October 2008 to approximate the laws of the Member States relating to trade marks must be interpreted as precluding an interpretation of national law according to which, in the context of proceedings raising the question whether a contourless colour mark has acquired a distinctive character through use, it is necessary in every case that a consumer survey indicate a degree of recognition of at least 70 %.

  2. 2.

    Where a Member State has not exercised the power laid down in the second sentence of Article 3(3) of Directive 2008/95, the first sentence of Article 3(3) of that directive must be interpreted as meaning that, in the context of invalidity proceedings in respect of a mark which is intrinsically devoid of distinctive character, in order to assess whether that mark has acquired a distinctive character through use, it is necessary to examine whether such character was acquired before the date of filing of the application for registration of that mark. It is irrelevant in that regard that the proprietor of the mark at issue maintains that the mark has, in any event, acquired a distinctive character through use after the date of filing of the application for registration, but before the date of registration of that mark.

  3. 3.

    Where a Member State does not exercise the power laid down in the second sentence of Article 3(3) of Directive 2008/95, the first sentence of Article 3(3) of that directive must be interpreted to the effect that it does not preclude, in the context of invalidity proceedings, the mark at issue from being declared invalid where it is intrinsically devoid of distinctive character and the proprietor of that mark has failed to show that it has acquired a distinctive character following the use which has been made of it before the date of filing of the application for registration.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Author information

Consortia

Additional information

Official headnotes.

Available at http://curia.europa.eu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Oberbank AG (C-217/13), Banco Santander SA (C-218/13), Santander Consumer Bank AG (C-218/13) v. Deutscher Sparkassen- und Giroverband eV Directive 2008/95/EC, Art. 3(1) and (3). “Sparkassen-Red”. IIC 46, 370–371 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40319-015-0330-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40319-015-0330-3

Keywords

Navigation