Skip to main content
Log in

“Pictograms”

Intellectual Property Code, Art. L. 711-1 – Groupement International d’Etiquetage pour l’Entretien des Textiles and COFREET v. Victoire sas

  • Decision • Trade Mark Law
  • France
  • Published:
IIC - International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law Aims and scope Submit manuscript
  1. 1.

    The signs on which the claim for infringement are based constitute nothing else but an information on how to ultimately handle textiles that are sold by third parties. The signs do not have the function of guaranteeing an origin and do not show any distinctive character.

  2. 2.

    As such, the signs are not used as trade marks. It has not been demonstrated that the consumer who purchases clothing identifies the pictogram labels as trade marks that could indicate an origin. Not even the associations that represent entrepreneurs in the textile sector (plaintiffs) use the signs in order to indicate an origin. In fact, the plaintiffs do not communicate to the public at all, but only address entrepreneurs in the textile sector in order to remind them that membership in their associations is required in order to use the signs in question.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Author information

Consortia

Additional information

Summarised from PIBD 913-III-147.

CH.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Decision of the Paris District Court (Tribunal de Grande Instance) 16 December 2009. “Pictograms”. IIC 45, 601–602 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40319-014-0224-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40319-014-0224-9

Navigation