Parameter estimation of lithium ion polymer battery mathematical model using genetic algorithm

  • Marcia de Fatima Brondani
  • Airam Teresa Zago Romcy Sausen
  • Paulo Sérgio Sausen
  • Manuel Osório Binelo
Article
  • 59 Downloads

Abstract

The accurate prediction of the rechargeable battery lifetime is of paramount importance for mobile device use optimization. The parameter estimation of battery models utilizes experimental methods that are expensive, require high computational effort, and are time-consuming. This paper presents both the proposition of a methodology based on Genetic Algorithm (GA) for the parameter estimation and the mathematical modeling of Lithium Ion Polymer (LiPo) battery lifetime, model PL383562-2C, using the battery model. The proposed GA method is compared with other empirical methodology that is generally applied to this estimation problem. It stands that the GA employed to estimate these parameters turned the estimation into a more systematic and less subjective process. The model validation is performed based on the comparison between the lifetimes simulated by the battery model and the average experimental lifetimes obtained from a test platform. The results demonstrate both the effectiveness of the battery model to predict the LiPo battery lifetime and the efficiency of GA in its parameter estimation.

Keywords

Parameter estimation Genetic algorithms Mathematical modeling Battery lifetime 

Mathematics Subject Classification

93A30 

References

  1. Baluja S, Caruana R (1995) Removing the genetics from the standard genetic algorithm. In: International conference on machine learning. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, pp 38–46Google Scholar
  2. Brand J, Zhang Z, Agarwal RK (2014) Extraction of battery parameters of the equivalent circuit model using a multi-objective genetic algorithm. J Power Sources 247:729–737CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Chen M, Rincón-Mora G (2006) Accurate electrical battery model capable of predicting runtime and IV performance. IEEE Trans Energy Convers 21(2):504–511CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chen Z, Mi CC, Fu Y, Xu J, Gong X (2013) Online battery state of health estimation based on genetic algorithm for electric and hybrid vehicle applications. J Power Sources 240:184–192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chiasserini C, Rao R (1999) Pulsed battery discharge in communication devices. In: Proceedings of the 5th international conference on mobile computing and networking, pp 88–95Google Scholar
  6. Doyle M, Fuller TF, Newman JS (1993) Modeling of galvanostatic charge and discharge of the lithium/polymer/insertion cell. J Electrochem Soc 140:1526–1533CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Guo S (2010) The application of genetic algorithms to parameter estimation in lead-acid battery equivalent circuit models. University of Birmingham, ThesisGoogle Scholar
  8. Hammond GP, Hazeldine T (2015) Indicative energy technology assessment of advanced rechargeable batteries. Appl Energy 138:559–571CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. He Y, Liu X, Zhang C, Chen Z (2013) A new model for state-of-charge (soc) estimation for high-power li-ion batteries. Appl Energy 101:808–814CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Holland JH (1975) Adaptation in natural and artificial systems. University of Michigan Press, Ann ArborGoogle Scholar
  11. Hu T, Jung H (2013) Simple algorithms for determining parameters of circuit models for charging/discharging batteries. J Power Sources 233:14–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Huria T, Ludovici G, Lutzemberger G (2014) State of charge estimation of high power lithium iron phosphate cells. J Power Sources 249:92–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. IT Union (2015) Measuring the Information Society Report 2015. ITU, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  14. Kim T, Qiao W (2011) A hybrid battery model capable of capturing dynamic circuit characteristics an nonlinear capacity effects. IEEE Wireless Commun Netw Conf 26:1172–1180Google Scholar
  15. Linden D, Reddy TB (1995) Handbook of bateries, 3rd edn. McGraw-Hill Handbooks, MaidenheadGoogle Scholar
  16. Malik A, Zhang Z, Agarwal RK (2014) Extraction of battery parameters using a multi-objective genetic algorithm with a non-linear circuit model. J Power Sources 259:76–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Man K, Tang K, Kwong S (1999) Genetic algorithms: concepts and designs. Advanced textbooks in control and signal processing. Springer, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. MathWorks (2015) Implement generic battery model. http://www.mathworks.com/help/physmod/sps/powersys/ref/battery.html
  19. Meyer WH (1998) Polymer electrolytes for lithium-ion batteries. Adv Mater 10:439–448CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Ng KS, Moo CS, Chen YP, Hsieh YC (2009) Enhanced coulomb counting method for estimating state-of-charge and state-of-health of lithium-ion batteries. Appl Energy 86(9):1506–1511CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Porciuncula CMD, Oliveira A, Sausen PS, Sausen A (2012) Avaliação comparativa entre o modelo elétrico battery e os modelos analíticos linear e lei de peukert. Rev Bras Comput Apl 4(1):71–80Google Scholar
  22. Porciuncula CMD, Sausen ATZR, Sausen PS (2015) Mathematical modeling for predicting battery lifetime through electrical models. Advances in Mathematics Research. Nova Science Publishers Incorporated, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  23. Rakhmatov D, Vrudhula S (2001) An analytical high-level battery model for use in energy management of portable electronic systems. National Science Foundation’s State/Industry/University Cooperative Research Centers (NSFS/IUCRC), Center for Low Power Electronics (CLPE), pp 1–6Google Scholar
  24. Ramadesigan V, Northrop PWC, De S, Santhanagopalan S, Braatz RD, Subramanian VR (2012) Modeling and simulation of lithium-ion batteries from a systems engineering perspective. J Electrochem Soc 159:31–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Romio LC, Sausen ATZR, Sausen PS, Reimbold M (2015) Mathematical modeling of the lithium-ion battery lifetime using system identification theory. Advances in Mathematics Research. Nova Science Publishers Incorporated, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  26. Russell S, Norvig P (2004) Inteligncia artificial: tradução da segunda edição. Elsevier, Rio de JaneiroGoogle Scholar
  27. Rydh CJ, Svrd B (2003) Impact on global metal flows arising from the use of portable rechargeable batteries. Sci Total Environ 302(1–3):167–184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Sausen PS, Spohn MA, Perkusich A (2010) Broadcast routing in wireless sensor networks with dynamic power management and multi-coverage backbones. Inf Sci 180(5):653–663CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Shepherd CM (1965) Design of primary and secondary cells. J Electrochem Soc 112:657–664CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Sivaraj R, Ravichandran T (2011) A review of selection methods in genetic algorithm. Int J Eng Sci Technol 3(5):3792–3797Google Scholar
  31. Suthar B, Ramadesigan V, Northrop PWC, Gopaluni RB, Santhanagopalan S, Braatz RD, Subramanian VR (2013) Optimal control and state estimation of lithium-ion batteries using reformulated models. In: American Control Conference, ACC 2013, Washington, DC, USA, June 17–19, 2013, pp 5350–5355Google Scholar
  32. Thirugnanam K, Ezhil Reena J, Singh M, Kumar P (2014) Mathematical modeling of li-ion battery using genetic algorithm approach for v2g applications. IEEE Trans Energy Convers 29(2):332–343CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Thirugnanam K, Saini H, Kumar P (2012) Mathematical modeling of li-ion battery for charge/discharge rate and capacity fading characteristics using genetic algorithm approach. In: Transportation electrification conference and expo (ITEC), pp 1–6Google Scholar
  34. Tremblay O, Dessaint LA (2009) Experimental validation of a battery dynamic model for ev applications. World Electric Veh J 3:289–298Google Scholar
  35. Tremblay O, Dessaint LA, Dekkiche AI (2007) A generic battery model for the dynamic simulation of hybrid electric vehicles. In: Vehicle power and propulsion conference, 2007, pp 284–289Google Scholar
  36. Xiong R, He H, Sun F, Liu X, Liu Z (2013) Model-based state of charge and peak power capability joint estimation of lithium-ion battery in plug-in hybrid electric vehicles. J Power Sources 229:159–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Yang N, Zhang X, Li G (2014) State-of-charge estimation for lithium ion batteries via the simulation of lithium distribution in the electrode particles. J Power Sources 272:68–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Zalzala A, Fleming P (1997) Genetic algorithms in engineering systems. IEE control engineering series. Institution of Electrical Engineers, PiscatawayCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© SBMAC - Sociedade Brasileira de Matemática Aplicada e Computacional 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marcia de Fatima Brondani
    • 1
  • Airam Teresa Zago Romcy Sausen
    • 1
  • Paulo Sérgio Sausen
    • 1
  • Manuel Osório Binelo
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Exact Sciences and EngineeringRegional University of Northwestern Rio Grande do Sul StateIjuíBrazil

Personalised recommendations