# A two-grid penalty method for American options

- 82 Downloads

## Abstract

In this paper we consider the pricing of American options, governed by a partial differential complementarity problem. The differential problem is first approximated by a semi-linear PDE using two distinct penalty approaches which are well known in computational finance. We then initiate the two-grid algorithm by solving the nonlinear problem on a coarse grid and further the linearized in the interpolated coarse-grid solution problem on a fine grid. By means of the maximum principle the algorithm is shown to be of fourth order convergence rate in space. Numerical experiments verify the presented two-grid approach where we draw some interesting conclusions.

## Keywords

Penalty method Finite difference Two-grid Newton method Maximum principle## Mathematics Subject Classification

35R35 65M06## Notes

### Acknowledgements

Authors would like to thank the anonymous reviewers for their valuable and constructive comments that greatly contributed to improve the quality of the paper.

## References

- Axelsson O (1993) On mesh independence and Newton-type methods. Appl Math 38(4):249–265MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
- Deng J, Tao Z, Zhang T (2016) Iterative penalty finite element methods for the steady incompressible magnetohydrodynamic problem. Comput Appl Math 1–21. doi: 10.1007/s40314-016-0323-y
- Duffy DJ (2013) Finite difference methods in financial engineering: a partial differential equation approach. Wiley, ChichesterGoogle Scholar
- Forsyth PA, Vetzal KR (2002) Quadratic convergence for valuing American options using a penalty method. SIAM J Sci Comput 23(6):2095–2122MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
- Grossmann C, Roos H-G (2007) Numerical treatment of partial differential equations. Springer, BerlinCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
- Gyulov TB, Valkov RL (2016) American option pricing problem transformed on finite interval. Int J Comput Math 93(5):821–836MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
- Haentjens T, in ’t Hout KJ (2012) Alternating direction implicit finite difference schemes for the Heston–Hull–White partial differential equation. J Comp Finance 16(1):83–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Howison S, Reisinger C, Witte JH (2013) The effect of nonsmooth payoffs on the penalty approximation of American options. SIAM J Financ Math 4(1):539–574MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
- Jaillet P, Lamberton D, Lapeyre B (1990) Variational inequalities and the pricing of American options. Acta Appl Math 21(3):263–289MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
- Jiang L (2005) Mathematical modeling and methods of option pricing. World Scientific, Singapore, p 329CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
- Khaliq AQM, Voss DA, Kazmi SHK (2006) A linearly implicit predictor-corrector scheme for pricing American options using a penalty method approach. J Bank Finance 30(2):489–502CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Koleva M, Valkov R (2016) Two-grid algorithms for pricing American options by a penalty method. Proc Algoritmy 2016:275–284Google Scholar
- Kovalov P, Linetsky V, Marcozzi M (2007) Pricing multi-asset American options: a finite element method-of-lines with smooth penalty. J Sci Comp 33(3):209–237MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
- Lauko M, Ševčovič D (2010) Comparison of the numerical and analytical approximations of the early exercise boundary of American options. ANZIAM J 51:430–448MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
- Martín-Vaquero J, Khaliq AQM, Kleefeld B (2014) Stabilized explicit Runge–Kutta methods for multi-asset American options. Comput Math Appl 67(6):1293–1308MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
- Moradipour M, Yousefi SA (2016) Using a meshless kernel-based method to solve the Black–Scholes variational inequality of American options. Comput Appl Math 1–13. doi: 10.1007/s40314-016-0351-7
- Nielsen BFr, Skavhaug O, Tveito A (2002) Penalty and front-fixing methods for the numerical solution of American option problems. J Comput Finance 5(4):69–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Nielsen BFr, Skavhaug O, Tveito A (2008) Penalty methods for the numerical solution of American multi-asset option problems. J Comput Appl Math 222(1):3–16MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
- Samarskii AA (2001) The theory of difference schemes. Marcel Dekker, BaselCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
- Ševčovič D, Stehlıková B, Mikula K (2011) Analytical and numerical methods for pricing financial derivatives. Nova Science Publishers, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Vulkov LG, Zadorin AI (2010) Two-grid algorithms for an ordinary second order equation with exponential boundary layer in the solution. Int J Numer Anal Model 7(3):580–592MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
- Wang J, Forsyth P (2008) Maximal use of central differencing for Hamilton–Jacobi–Bellman PDEs in finance. SIAM J Numer Anal 46(3):1580–1601MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
- Xu J (1996) Two-grid discretization techniques for linear and nonlinear PDEs. SIAM J Numer Anal 33(5):1759–1777MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
- Zhang K, Wang S (2011) Convergence property of an interior penalty approach to pricing American option. J Ind Manag Optim 7(2):435MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar