Skip to main content

Mathematical modeling of spacecraft guidance and control system in 3D space orbit transfer mission

Abstract

Spacecraft performance in an orbital maneuver relies on guidance and control systems which manage the thrust direction within orbit transfer. In this article, the guidance and control approach for spacecraft having a 3D orbit transfer mission is proposed. To derive the optimal variation of steering angles with initial and terminal constraints on the space orbits, a mathematics polynomial function of the guidance command with unknown coefficients is introduced, one of which is determined to achieve the transfer accuracy requirement between space orbits. Genetic Algorithm is employed in finding optimal variation of guidance command and the optimal initial states within the transfer. The attitude control system is also modeled to evaluate the spacecraft response with respect to generated commands by the guidance system. Gas thrusters are considered as attitude actuators for space mission and linear controller with pulse-width pulse-frequency modulator and unconstrained control allocation is employed for controlling steering angles. Results indicate that the presented approach for guidance and control system fairly satisfies the mission requirement.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

References

  • Assadian N, Pourtakdoust S (2010) Multiobjective genetic optimization of Earth–Moon trajectories in the restricted four-body problem. Adv Space Res 45(3):398–409

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang W (2007) Nonlinear system identification and control using a real-coded genetic algorithm. Appl Math Model 31(3):541–550

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Cong B, Liu X, Chen Z (2011) A precise and robust control strategy for rigid spacecraft eigenaxis rotation. Chin J Aeronaut 24(4):484–492

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Curtis H (2014) Orbital mechanics for engineering students. Elsevier, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Diaz-Calderon A, Paredis C, Khosla P (2000) Automatic generation of system-level dynamic equations for mechatronic systems. Comput Aided Design 32(5–6):339–354

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • dos Santos D, da Silva Formiga J (2014) Application of a genetic algorithm in orbital maneuvers. Comput Appl Math 34(2):437–450

    MathSciNet  Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Geng J, Sheng Y, Liu X (2014) Finite-time sliding mode attitude control for a reentry vehicle with blended aerodynamic surfaces and a reaction control system. Chin J Aeronaut 27(4):964–976

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Godard Kumar K, Zou A (2013) A novel single thruster control strategy for spacecraft attitude stabilization. Acta Astronaut 86:55–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu Q, Zhang Y, Huo X, Xiao B (2011) Adaptive integral-type sliding mode control for spacecraft attitude maneuvering under actuator stuck failures. Chin J Aeronaut 24(1):32–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ikenaga T, Utashima M, Ishii N, Hiraiwa T, Noda A (2014) Study on the orbital maneuvering capability of H-2A kick stage. Acta Astronaut 94(2):718–724

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiao H, Wang Z, Chen Y (2013) Global optimization algorithm for sum of generalized polynomial ratios problem. Appl Math Model 37(1–2):187–197

    MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johansen T, Fossen T (2013) Control allocation—a survey. Automatica 49(5):1087–1103

    MathSciNet  Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Kakoi M, Howell K, Folta D (2014) Access to Mars from Earth–Moon libration point orbits: manifold and direct options. Acta Astronaut 102:269–286

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee C, Kim T, Tahk M, Whang I (2013) Polynomial guidance laws considering terminal impact angle and acceleration constraints. IEEE Trans Aerosp Electron Syst 49(1):74–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li C, Teo K, Li B, Ma G (2012) A constrained optimal PID-like controller design for spacecraft attitude stabilization. Acta Astronaut 74:131–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lim T (2014) Thruster attitude control system design and performance for tactical satellite 4 maneuvers. J Guid Control Dyn 37(2):403–412

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luo Q, Yin J, Han C (2013) Design of Earth–Moon free-return trajectories. J Guid Control Dyn 36(1):263–271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Motlagh J, Novinzadeh A (2012) Solid upper stage design process using finite burn maneuvers for low Earth orbit-geosynchronous Earth orbit transfer phase. Proc Inst Mech Eng G J Aerosp Eng 227(6):966–976

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nobari N, Misra A (2012) Attitude dynamics and control of satellites with fluid ring actuators. J Guid Control Dyn 35(6):1855–1864

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patton R, Uppal F, Simani S, Polle B (2010) Robust FDI applied to thruster faults of a satellite system. Control Eng Pract 18(9):1093–1109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prado A, Gomes V (2014) Searching for capture and escape trajectories around Jupiter using its Galilean satellites. Comput Appl Math 34(2):451–460

    MathSciNet  Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Salazar F, Macau E, Winter O (2014) Pareto Frontier for the time-energy cost vector to an Earth–Moon transfer orbit using the patched-conic approximation. Comput Appl Math 34(2):461–475

  • Sarli B, da Silva A, Paglione P (2014) Sliding mode attitude control using thrusters and pulse modulation for the ASTER mission. Comput Appl Math 34(2):535–556

    MathSciNet  Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Wie B (2008) Space vehicle dynamics and control. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Reston

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Wu S, Wang R, Radice G, Wu Z (2015) Robust attitude maneuver control of spacecraft with reaction wheel low-speed friction compensation. Aerosp Sci Technol 43:213–218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang Z, Luo Y, Zhang J (2013) Two-level optimization approach for Mars orbital long-duration, large non-coplanar rendezvous phasing maneuvers. Adv Space Res 52(5):883–894

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang A, Hu Q, Huo X (2013) Dynamic control allocation for spacecraft attitude stabilization with actuator uncertainty. Proc Inst Mech Eng G J Aerosp Eng 228(8):1336–1347

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmer S, Ocampo C, Bishop R (2010) Reducing orbit covariance for continuous thrust spacecraft transfers. IEEE Trans Aerosp Electron Syst 46(2):771–791

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Abolfazl Shirazi.

Additional information

Communicated by Eduardo Souza de Cursi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shirazi, A., Mazinan, A.H. Mathematical modeling of spacecraft guidance and control system in 3D space orbit transfer mission. Comp. Appl. Math. 35, 865–879 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40314-015-0290-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40314-015-0290-8

Keywords

  • Guidance
  • Control
  • Spacecraft
  • Polynomials
  • Genetic algorithm
  • Attitude
  • Thruster
  • Orbital maneuver

Mathematics Subject Classification

  • 93C35
  • 93C15
  • 49K15
  • 65K05
  • 37M05