Skip to main content
Log in

A Simple Optimization Method for Tuning the Gains of PID Controllers for the Autopilot of Cessna 182 Aircraft Using Model-in-the-Loop Platform

  • Published:
Journal of Control, Automation and Electrical Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Currently, there is a growing demand for automatic control systems for unmanned aerial vehicles due to the numerous civil and military applications. An unmanned aerial vehicle has sophisticated and complex controllers that are used to stabilize it, which composes the autopilot. In autopilots, PID controllers are commonly used, and various techniques are applied to tune their gains. In this paper are proposed optimization procedures of gains for the designed PID controllers from the transfer functions simulated in the Matlab/Simulink software, establishing a model-in-the-loop system, for the autopilot of the Cessna 182 aircraft. In this context, results of simulations are obtained to prove the effectiveness of using these proposals for optimization. They offer a simple, effective, systematic and replicable way to obtain the gains and dispense the use of classical methods of determination of gains for control loops, as well as the trial and error method.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Blakelock, J. H. (1991). Automatic control of aircraft and missiles. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, M. V. (2007). Flight dynamics principles. A linear systems approach to aircraft stability and control (2nd ed.). Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • do Carmo, M. J., Oliveira, Â. R., & Carvalho, J. R. (2012). Use of statistics as non-intrusive indexes in the evaluation of behavior of the control loops: A case study for systems with transport delay. In XXXVI national congress of applied and computational mathematics (CNMAC) (vol. 2194, pp. 1034–1040). (in Portuguese).

  • Franklin, G. F., Powell, J. D., & Emami-Naeini, A. (2015). Feedback control of dynamic systems (7th edition, Global Edition). New York: Pearson.

  • Kada, B., & Ghazzawi, Y. (2011). Robust pid controller design for an UAV flight control system. Lecture Notes in Engineering and Computer Science, 2194, 945–950.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehmann, E. L., & Casella, G. (2006). Theory of point estimation. Berlin: Springer.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Mathworks.com: Simulink design optimization (2016). http://www.mathworks.com/help/sldo/index.html.

  • McLean, D. (1991). Automatic flight control systems. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, R. C. (1998). Flight stability and automatic control. New York: WCB/McGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ogata, K. (2011). Modern control engineering (5th ed.). New York: Pearson.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Pedroni, J. P., Cova, J. D. W. (2013). Orientation control with velocity feedback loop for an aerospatial gimbal nozzle implemented in a hardware-in-the-loop simulation environment. IEEE Latin America Transactions, 11(11), 287–292. https://doi.org/10.1109/TLA.2013.6502818.

  • Research, L. (2016). X-plane. http://www.x-plane.com.

  • Ribeiro, L. R., & Oliveira, N. M. F. (2010). Uav autopilot controllers test platform using matlab/simulink and x-plane. In Proceedings of the 40th ASEE/IEEE frontiers in education conference (pp. 1–6). Washington, DC. https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE.2010.5673378.

  • Rodrigues, L. E. M. J. (2013). Fundamentals of aeronautical engineering. Cengage Learning. (in Portuguese).

  • Roskam, D. (2001). Airplane flight dynamics and automatic flight controls—Part I and II. Lawrence: DAR Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Santos, S. R. B., & de Oliveira, N. M. F. (2011). Longitudinal autopilot controllers test platform hardware in the loop. In Proceedings of the 2011 IEEE international systems conference (SysCon) (pp. 379–386). Montreal. https://doi.org/10.1109/SYSCON.2011.5929071.

  • Splendor, F., Martins, N. A., Gimenes, I. M. S., & Martini, J. A. (2015). Design of an autopilot for cessna 182. IEEE Latin America Transactions, 13(1), 27–36. https://doi.org/10.1109/TLA.2015.7040624. (In Portuguese).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thums, G. D., Torres, L. A. B., & Palhares, R. M. (2012). Methodology of pid tuning with multiloop for unmanned aerial vehicles: Longitudinal dynamics. In Proceedings of the XIX Brazilian congress of automatic (pp. 358–365). Campina Grande, PB, Brazil. (in Portuguese).

  • Vale, M. R. B. G. (2007). Comparative analysis of the performance of a controller coupled to a fuzzy neural pid tuned by a genetic algorithm with intelligent conventional controllers. Master’s thesis, Postgraduate Program in Electrical and Computer Engineering, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte. (in Portuguese).

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are thankful to the Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel—CAPES—for the financial support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nardênio Almeida Martins.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Freire, F.P., Martins, N.A. & Splendor, F. A Simple Optimization Method for Tuning the Gains of PID Controllers for the Autopilot of Cessna 182 Aircraft Using Model-in-the-Loop Platform. J Control Autom Electr Syst 29, 441–450 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40313-018-0391-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40313-018-0391-x

Keywords

Navigation