Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Study of Electricity Theft Impact on the Economy of a Regulated Electricity Company

  • Published:
Journal of Control, Automation and Electrical Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The electricity theft is an economic issue for the electricity company due to unbilled revenue of consumers who commit such action. In a regulated scenario, the company needs to fit within the laws of a regulatory agency (ANEEL in Brazil) and the loss of revenue is a problem that can compromise the compliance with regulatory targets and business efficiency. The objective of this article is to analyze how the energy theft impacts on the economy of the regulated company, consumers and society as a whole. Through the economic model TAROT (optimized tariff), it was possible through a concise and comprehensive manner to analyze the regulated electricity market using simulations and discover in which points the company operates regulated and through it to determine the economic indicators.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Al-Mahroqi, Y., Metwally, I. A., Al-Hinai, A., & Al-Badi, A. (2012). Reduction of power losses in distribution systems. International Journal of Electrical, Computer, Energetic, Electronic and Communication Engineering, 6(3)

  • Amin, S., Schwartz, G. A., Cardenas, A. A., & Sastry, S. S. (2015). Game-theoretic models of electricity theft detection in smart utility networks: Providing new capabilities with advanced metering infrastructure. IEEE Control Systems, 35, 66–81.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Amin, S., Schwartz, G. A., & Tembine, H. (2012). Incentives and security in electricity distribution networks. In J. Grossklags & J. Walrand (Eds.), GameSec 2012, LNCS 7638 (pp. 264–280)

  • ANEEL. (2008). Second periodic tariff revision of electric power distribution company. Technical report 33/208., Technical report, Brasilia, Brazil (in portuguese).

  • Arango, H., Abreu, J. P. G., Bonatto, B. D., Kagan, N., Tahan, C. M. V., & Gouvea, M. R. (2008). A model for electricity markets: the impact of regulation on value. In 2008 5th international conference on the European electricity market, EEM

  • Arango, H., Abreu, J. P. G., Bonatto, B. D., Tahan, C. M. V., Kagan, N., & Gouvea, M. R. (2008). The economic impact of power quality and its optimal regulation. In Induscon-VIII international conference of industrial applications, Pocos de Caldas, Brazil (in Portuguese)

  • Arango, H., De Abreu, J. P. G., Bonatto, B. D., Tahan, C. M. V., Kagan, N., & Gouvea, M. R. (2010). The influence of quality on the creation of economic value in electricity markets. In ICHQP 2010—14th international conference on harmonics and quality of power

  • Arango, L. G., Deccache, E., Bonatto, B. D., Arango, H., Ribeiro, P. F., & Silveira, P. M. (2016). Impact of electricity theft on power quality. In IEEE PES ICHQP 2016-17th international conference on harmonics and quality of power, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais State, Brazil

  • Electricity North West Limited. (2015). Losses strategy. http://www.enwl.co.uk/docs/default-source/default-document-library/electricity-north-west---losses-strategy---april-2015.

  • Fourie, J. W. (2004). A strategy for the management of energy losses in a local electricity distribution network, Master thesis, Faculty of Engineering, the Built Environment and Information Technology-University Of Pretoria

  • Jehle, G. A., & Reny, J. P. (2000). Advanced microeconomic theory (2nd ed.). Boston: Addison Wesley Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, J. D., & Petty, J. W. (2000). Value based management. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Millard, R., & Emmerton, M. (2009). Non technical losses: How do other countries tackle the problem In AMEU convention

  • Penin, C. (2008). Combat, prevention and optimization of electrical energy commercial losses, Ph.D. thesis, Polythecnic School from the University of Sao Paulo (in Portuguese)

  • Smith, T. B. (2004). Electricity theft: A comparative analysis. Energy Policy, 32, 2067–2076.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UK Power Networks. (2014). Business Plan (2015–2023)-Annex 7: Losses strategy.

  • World bank group energy sector strategy. (2009). Reducing technical and non-technical losses in the power sector.

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank ELETROBRAS, ANEEL, INERGE, CAPES, CNPq and FAPEMIG for financially supporting this research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to L. G. Arango.

Appendix

Appendix

TAROT (acronym for optimized tariff) is a model based on demonstration of the company’s value. It combines the EVA calculation methodology, worldwide popularized by the company STERN and STEWART with ANEEL regulatory procedure for tariff revision. TAROT is based on a structure of expenditures (G), appropriate to electrical distribution system, which relates the costs in proportion to sales, technical losses and depreciation on investment. Starting from the revenue (R), results taxable gains (EBIT \(= R - G\)) and taxes (\(X = t\).EBIT). Finally, capital remuneration is subtracted (\(Y = r_{w}.B\)) where (B) is the investment and (\(r_{w}\)) the cost of capital (WACC—weighted average capital cost).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Arango, L.G., Deccache, E., Bonatto, B.D. et al. Study of Electricity Theft Impact on the Economy of a Regulated Electricity Company. J Control Autom Electr Syst 28, 567–575 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40313-017-0325-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40313-017-0325-z

Keywords

Navigation