Skip to main content
Log in

Intelligent Control Architecture for Assistive Mobile Robots

  • Published:
Journal of Control, Automation and Electrical Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The current technology has provided the necessary means for creating better assistive tools. Among these tools, the interest on assistive robotics has been growing, since its cost is being reduced and new equipment is introduced on the market. Yet, developing robots for aiding therapy is not an easy task because robotics is intrinsically multidisciplinary. Among the several research fields contributing to robotics research, two are of particular interest: control architectures and human–robot interaction. This paper covers ongoing research projects on assistive mobile robots for child rehabilitation developed in collaboration with Brazilian and Colombian Universities and proposes an intelligent control architecture based on human–robot interaction for assistive applications. Furthermore, it presents a case study on assistive robots for special education.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arkin, R. C. (1988). Behavior-based robotics. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arkin, R. C. (1989). Motor schema—based mobile robot navigation. The International Journal of Robotics Research, 8(4), 92–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson, R. C., & Shiffrin, R. M. (1968). Human memory: A proposed system and its control processes. The Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 2, 89–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burke, J., Murphy, R., Rogers, E., Lumelsky, V., & Scholtz, J. (2004). Final report for the DARPA/NSF interdisciplinary study on human-robot interaction. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Part C (Applications and Reviews), 34(2), 103–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coeckelbergh, M., Pop, C., Simut, R., Peca, A., Pintea, S., David, D., et al. (2015). A survey of expectations about the role of robots in robot-assisted therapy for children with ASD: Ethical acceptability, trust, sociability, appearance, and attachment. Science and Engineering Ethics, 22(1), 47–65. doi:10.1007/s11948-015-9649-x.

  • Dautenhahn, K., & Billard, A. (2002). Games children with autism can play with robota, a humanoid robotic doll. In S. Keates, P. Langdon, P. J. Clarkson, & P. Robinson (Eds.), Universal Access and Assistive Technology: Proceedings of the Cambridge Workshop on UA and AT 02 (pp. 179–190). London: Springer London. doi:10.1007/978-1-4471-3719-1_18.

  • Duquette, A., Michaud, F., & Mercier, H. (2007). Exploring the use of a mobile robot as an imitation agent with children with low-functioning autism. Autonomous Robots, 24(2), 147–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Du, G., & Zhang, P. (2015). A markerless human-robot interface using particle filter and kalman filter for dual robots. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 62(4), 2257–2264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ekman, P. (1999). Handbook of cognition and emotion. In T. Dalgleish & M. J. Power (Eds.), Basic emotions (pp. 45–60). John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

  • Emery, N. J. (2000). The eyes have it: The neuroethology, function and evolution of social gaze. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 24(6), 581–604.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gazzaniga, M., Heatherton, T., & Halpern, D. (2012). Motivation and emotion. In Psychological science (4th ed.). New York, NY: W.W. Norton & Company.

  • Goodrich, M. A., Colton, M. A., Brinton, B., & Fujiki, M. (2011). A case for low-dose robotics in autism therapy. In Proceedings of the 6th international conference on Human-robot interaction (pp. 143–144).

  • Goodrich, M. A., & Schultz, A. C. (2007). Human-robot interaction: a survey. Foundations and Trends in Human-Computer Interaction, 1(3), 203–275.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Han, M. J., Lin, C. H., & Song, K. T. (2013). Robotic emotional expression generation based on mood transition and personality model. IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics, 43(4), 1290–1303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iacono, I., Lehmann, H., Marti, P., Robins, B., Dautenhahn, K. (2011). Robots as social mediators for children with Autism—A preliminary analysis comparing two different robotic platforms. In 2011 IEEE International Conference on Development and Learning (ICDL) (Vol. 2, pp. 1–6).

  • Jakoi, E., & Carbrey, J. (2015). Introductory Human Physiology. Lulu.com. http://www.lulu.com/shop/emma-jakoi-and-jennifer-carbrey/introductory-human-physiology/ebook/product-22080962.html.

  • Kim, E., Paul, R., Shic, F., & Scassellati, B. (2012). Bridging the research gap: Making HRI useful to individuals with autism. Journal of Human-Robot Interaction, 1, 26–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larue, O., Poirier, P., & Nkambou, R. (2013). The emergence of (artificial) emotions from cognitive and neurological processes. Biologically Inspired Cognitive Architectures, 4, 54–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maslow, A. H. (1943). A theory of human motivation. Psychological Review, 50(4), 370–396.

  • Mulligan, K., & Scherer, K. R. (2012). Toward a working definition of emotion. Emotion Review, 4(4), 345–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pereira, F. G., Vassallo, R. F., & Salles, E. O. T. (2013). Human-robot interaction and cooperation through people detection and gesture recognition. Journal of Control, Automation and Electrical Systems, 24(3), 187–198.

  • Posner, J., Russell, J. A., & Peterson, B. S. (2005). The circumplex model of affect: An integrative approach to affective neuroscience, cognitive development, and psychopathology. Development and Psychopathology, 17(3), 715–734.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reilent, E. (2012). Whiteboard architecture for the multi-agent sensor systems. Doctoral thesis, Tallinn University of Technology, Tallinn, Estônia.

  • Robins, B., Dautenhahn, K., Nehaniv, C. L., Mirza, N. A., François, D., & Olsson, L. (2005). Sustaining interaction dynamics and engagement in dyadic child-robot interaction kinesics: Lessons learnt from an exploratory study. In Robot and Human Interactive Communication, 2005. ROMAN 2005. IEEE International Workshop on (pp. 716–722).

  • Robins, B., Ferrari, E., Dautenhahn, K., Kronreif, G., Prazak-Aram, B., Gelderblom, G. J., et al. (2010). Human-centred design methods: Developing scenarios for robot assisted play informed by user panels and field trials. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 68(12), 873–898.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russell, J. A. (1980). A circumplex model of affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39(6), 1161–1178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sellers, M. (2013). Toward a comprehensive theory of emotion for biological and artificial agents. Biologically Inspired Cognitive Architectures, 4, 3–26.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Thórisson, K. R., List, T., Pennock, C., & DiPirro, J. (2005). Whiteboards: Scheduling blackboards for semantic routing of messages and streams. In AAAI-05 Workshop on Modular Construction of Human-Like Intelligence (pp. 8–15).

  • Valadão, C., Bastos, T., Bor̂tole, M., Perim, V., Celino, D., Rodor, F., et al. (2011). Educational robotics as a learning aid for disabled children. In Biosignals and Biorobotics Conference (BRC), 2011 ISSNIP (pp. 1–6).

  • Villa-Parra, A. C., Broche, L., Delisle-Rodríguez, D., Sagaró, R., Bastos, T., & Frizera-Neto, A. (2015). Design of active orthoses for a robotic gait rehabilitation system. Frontiers of Mechanical Engineering, 10(3), 242–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Viola, P., & Jones, M. (2001). Rapid object detection using a boosted cascade of simple features. In Proceedings of the IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, CVPR (Vol. 1, pp. I-511–I-518).

  • Zhang, J., & Sharkey, A. J. C. (2012). It’s not all written on the robot’s face. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 60(11), 1449–1456.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank the Group of Integration of Intelligent Systems and Devices (GISDI), of the Department of Computing, Faculty of Sciences, São Paulo State University, Bauru, Brazil. We also thank the Laboratory of Intelligent Automation (LAI), of the Department of Electrical Engineering, Center for Technology, Federal University of Espírito Santo, Vitória, Brazil, for their support. We also thank Freepik for the pictographs and to Kevin MacLeod for the music.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Silas Franco dos Reis Alves.

Additional information

This work was supported by São Paulo Research Foundation under Grants 2011/17610-0 and 2012/12050-0.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

dos Reis Alves, S.F., Ferasoli Filho, H. Intelligent Control Architecture for Assistive Mobile Robots. J Control Autom Electr Syst 27, 515–526 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40313-016-0249-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40313-016-0249-z

Keywords

Navigation