Skip to main content
Log in

Multiply Robust Estimation of Quantile Treatment Effects with Missing Responses

  • Published:
Communications in Mathematics and Statistics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Causal inference and missing data have attracted significant research interests in recent years, while the current literature usually focuses on only one of these two issues. In this paper, we develop two multiply robust methods to estimate the quantile treatment effect (QTE), in the context of missing data. Compared to the commonly used average treatment effect, QTE provides a more complete picture of the difference between the treatment and control groups. The first one is based on inverse probability weighting, the resulting QTE estimator is root-n consistent and asymptotic normal, as long as the class of candidate models of propensity scores contains the correct model and so does that for the probability of being observed. The second one is based on augmented inverse probability weighting, which further relaxes the restriction on the probability of being observed. Simulation studies are conducted to investigate the performance of the proposed method, and the motivated CHARLS data are analyzed, exhibiting different treatment effects at various quantile levels.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bang, H., Robins, J.M.: Doubly robust estimation in missing data and causal inference models. Biometrics 61, 962–973 (2005)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Cai, Z.W., Fang, Y., Lin, M., Tang, S.F.: Inferences for partially conditional quantile treatment effect model. Technical Report 202005, Department of Economics, University of Kansas (2020)

  3. Chen, C.X., Shen, B.Y., Liu, A.Y., Wu, R.L., Wang, M.: A multiple robust propensity score method for longitudinal analysis with intermittent missing data. Biometrics 77(2), 519–532 (2021)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Chen, L.J., Li, D.Y., Zhou, C.: Distributed inference for the extreme value index. Biometrika 109(1), 257–264 (2021)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Chen, X., Liu, W.D., Zhang, Y.C.: Quantile regression under memory constraint. Ann. Stat. 47(6), 3244–3273 (2019)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Christelis, D., Dobrescu, L.I.: The causal effect of social activities on cognition: evidence from 20 European countries. Soc. Sci. Medi. 247, 1–9 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Donald, S., Hsu, Y.C.: Estimation and inference for distribution functions and quantile functions in treatment effect models. J. Econom. 178, 383–397 (2014)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Firpo, S.: Efficient semiparametric estimation of quantile treatment effects. Econometrica 75(1), 259–276 (2007)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Han, P.S., Kong, L.L., Zhao, J.W., Zhou, X.C.: A general framework for quantile estimation with incomplete data. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B (Stat. Methodol.) 81(2), 305–333 (2019)

  10. Han, P.S., Wang, L.: Estimation with missing data: beyond double robustness. Biometrika 100, 417–430 (2013)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Han, P.S.: Multiply robust estimation in regression analysis with missing data. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 109(507), 1159–1173 (2014)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Hernán, M.A., Robins, J.M.: Causal Inference: What If. Chapman & Hall/CRC, Boca Raton (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Hu, Y.Q., Lei, X.Y., Smith, J.P., Zhao, Y.H.: Effects of social activities on cognitive functions: evidence from CHARLS. In: Aging in Asia: Findings From New and Emerging Data Initiatives, pp. 279–308, Chap. 12. National Academies Press (US), Washington (2012)

  14. Imbens, G.W., Rubin, D.B.: Causal Inference for Statistics, Social, and Biomedical Sciences: An Introduction. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2015)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  15. Lin, H.Z., Zhou, F.Y., Wang, Q.X., Zhou, L., Qin, J.: Robust and efficient estimation for the treatment effect in causal inference and missing data problems. J. Econom. 205(2), 363–380 (2018)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Liu, H.X., Fan, X.J., Luo, H.Y., Zhou, Z.L., Shen, C., Hu, N.B., Zhai, X.M.: Comparison of depressive symptoms and its influencing factors among the elderly in urban and rural areas: evidence from the china health and retirement longitudinal study (CHARLS). Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 18(8), 3886 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Lunceford, J.K., Davidian, M.: Stratification and weighting via the propensity score in estimation of causal treatment effects: a comparative study. Stat. Med. 23, 2937–2960 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Melly, B.: Estimation of counterfactual distributions using quantile regression. University of St.Gallen, Monograph (discussion paper) (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Rosenbaum, P.R., Rubin, D.B.: Reducing bias in observational studies using subclassification on the propensity score. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 79(387), 516–524 (1984)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Rosenbaum, P.R., Rubin, D.B.: The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika 70(1), 41–55 (1983)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  21. Rubin, D.B.: Multiple Imputation for Nonresponse in Surveys. Wiley, New York (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Seaman, S.R., White, I.R.: Review of inverse probability weighting for dealing with missing data. Stat. Methods Med. Res. 22, 278–295 (2013)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  23. Tan, Z.Q.: Bounded, efficient and doubly robust estimation with inverse weighting. Biometrika 97(3), 661–682 (2010)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  24. Wei, Y., Ma, Y.Y., Carroll, R.J.: Multiple imputation in quantile regression. Biometrika 99, 423–438 (2012)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  25. Xie, Y.Y., Cotton, C., Zhu, Y.Y.: Multiply robust estimation of causal quantile treatment effects. Stat. Med. 39, 4238–4251 (2020)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  26. Zhang, Y.C.: Extremal quantile treatment effects. Ann. Stat. 46(6B), 3707–3740 (2018)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  27. Zhang, Z.W., Chen, Z., Troendle, J.F., Zhang, J.: Causal inference on quantiles with an obstetric application. Biometrics 68, 697–706 (2012)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank two anonymous reviewers, an associate editor and the editor for constructive comments and helpful suggestions. This publication is based upon work partially supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China grants 11871376 and 11871164, Natural Science Foundation of Shanghai 21ZR1420700 and Open Research Fund of KLATASDS-MOE.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Yanlin Tang or Yinfeng Wang.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary information

The online Supplemental Materials include some notations used in asymptotic properties and all technical proofs. (pdf 410KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, X., Qin, G., Tang, Y. et al. Multiply Robust Estimation of Quantile Treatment Effects with Missing Responses. Commun. Math. Stat. (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40304-023-00380-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40304-023-00380-4

Keywords

Mathematics Subject Classification

Navigation