Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. NY: W.H. Freeman and Company.
Bandura, A., Barbaranelli, C., Caprara, G. V., & Pastorelli, C. (1996). Multifaceted impact of self-efficacy beliefs on academic functioning. Child Development, 67(3), 1206–1222.
Benight, C. C., & Bandura, A. (2004). Social cognitive theory of post-traumatic recovery: The role of perceived self-efficacy. Behaviour Research and Therapy,
Betz, N. E., & Hackett, G. (1986). Applications of self-efficacy theory to understanding career choice behavior. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 4(3), 279–289.
Brauner, P., Leonhardt, T., Ziefle, M., and Schroeder, U. (2010). The effect of tangible artifacts, gender and subjective technical competence on teaching programming to seventh graders. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Informatics in Secondary Schools (ISSEP 2010) (LNCS, Vol. 5941, pp. 61–71).
Casella, G., & Berger, R. L. (2002). Statistical inference (2nd ed.). Pacific Grove, CA: Duxbury.
Ceci, S. J., & Williams, W. M. (2011). Understanding current causes of women’s underrepresentation in science. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,
Chen, D., & Kelly, H. (2013). Understanding the leaky STEM pipeline by taking a closer look at factors influencing retention and graduation rates. Institutional Research, University of Delaware.
Department of Commerce. (2011). Women in stem: A gender gap to innovation. U.S. Department of Commerce. http://www.esa.doc.gov/reports/women-stem-gender-gap-innovation.
Department of Education and Training. (2014). Restoring the focus on STEM in schools initiative. Department of Education and Training of Australian Government.
Fan, X., Chen, M., & Matsumoto, A. R. (1997). Gender differences in mathematics achievement: Findings from the National Education Longitudinal Study of 1988. The Journal of Experimental Education,
35(3), 229–242. doi:10.1080/00220973.1997.9943456.
Geary, D. C. (2011). Cognitive predictors of achievement growth in mathematics: A 5-year longitudinal study. Developmental Psychology,
Guiso, L., Monte, F., Sapienza, P., & Zingales, L. (2008). Culture, gender, and math. Science,
320(5880), 1164–1165. doi:10.1126/science.1154094.
Halpern, D. F., Benbow, C. P., Geary, D. C., Gur, R. C., Hyde, J. S., & Gernsbacher, M. A. (2007). The science of sex differences in science and mathematics. Psychological Science in the Public Interest,
8(1), 1–51. doi:10.1111/j.1529-1006.2007.00032.x.
Hyde, J. S. (2005). The gender similarities hypothesis. American Psychologist,
60(6), 581–592. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.60.6.581.
Hyde, J. S., Lindberg, S. M., Linn, M. C., Ellis, A. B., & Williams, C. C. (2008). Gender similarities characterize math performance. Science,
321(5888), 494–495. doi:10.1126/science.1160364.
Hyde, J. S., & Mertz, J. E. (2009). Gender, culture, and mathematics performance. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,
106(22), 8801–8807. doi:10.1073/pnas.0901265106.
Langenfeld, T. E. (1997). Test fairness: Internal and external investigations of gender bias in mathematics testing. Educational Measurement,
16(1), 20–26. doi:10.1111/j.1745-3992.1997.tb00582.x.
Li, Q. (1999). Teachers’ beliefs and gender differences in mathematics: A review. Educational Research,
41(1), 63–76. doi:10.1080/0013188990410106.
Lindberg, S. M., Hyde, J. S., Petersen, J. L., & Linn, M. C. (2010). New trends in gender and mathematics performance: A meta-analysis. Psychological bulletin, 136(6), 1123–1135
Liu, O. L., & Wilson, M. (2009). Gender differences and similarities in PISA 2003 mathematics: A comparison between the United States and Hong Kong. International Journal of Testing,
9(1), 20–40. doi:10.1080/15305050902733547.
Machin, S., & Pekkarinen, T. (2008). Global sex differences in test score variability. Science,
322(5906), 1331–1332. doi:10.1126/science.1162573.
Mullis, I. V., Martin, M. O., Fierros, E. G., Goldberg, A. L., Stemler, S. E. (2000). Gender differences in achievement: IEA’s third international mathematics and science study (TIMSS). International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement. http://timssandpirls.bc.edu/timss1995i/TIMSSPDF/t95_gender_all.pdf.
Mullis, I. V., Martin, M. O., & Foy, P. (2005). IEA’s TIMSS 2003 international report on achievement in the mathematics cognitive domains. Chestnut Hill, MA: Lynch School of Education, Boston College. http://timssandpirls.bc.edu/timss2003i/mcgdm.html.
National Center for Education Statistics. (2002). Digest of education statistics: 2001. Washington, DC: Author. http://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/pubsinfo.asp?pubid=2002130.
National Center for Education Statistics. (2005). Digest of education statistics, 2005. Washington, DC: Author. http://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/pubsinfo.asp?pubid=2006030.
National Science Foundation. (2008). Science and engineering indicators 2008. National Science Foundation. http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/seind08/.
New York Hall of Science. (2012). Design-make-play: Growing the next generation of science innovators. Author.
OECD. (2003). The PISA 2003 assessment framework: Mathematics, reading, science and problem solving knowledge and skills. Paris: OECD Publishing.
OECD. (2004). Learning for tomorrow’s world: First results from PISA 2003. Paris: OECD Publishing.
OECD. (2009). PISA data analysis manual: SPSS (2nd ed.). Paris: OECD Publishing.
OECD. (2013). PISA 2012 assessment and analytical framework: Mathematics, reading, science, problem solving and financial literacy. Paris: OECD Publishing. doi:10.1787/9789264190511-en.
OECD. (2014a). PISA 2012 results: What students know and can do—student performance in mathematics, reading and science (Revised edition ed., Vol. 1). Paris: OECD Publishing. doi:10.1787/9789264201118-en.
OECD. (2014b). PISA 2012 technical report. Paris: OECD Publishing. http://www.oecd.org/pisa/pisaproducts/pisa2012technicalreport.htm.
Pajares, F. (1996). Self-efficacy beliefs in academic settings. Review of Educational Research,
66, 543–578. doi:10.3102/00346543066004543.
Pajares, F. (2002). Self-efficacy beliefs in academic contexts: An outline.” Retrieved June 26, 2017, from http://des.emory.edu/mfp/efftalk.html.
Pajares, F., & Margaret, J. J. (1994). Confidence and competence in writing: The role of self-efficacy, outcome expectancy, and apprehension. Research in the Teaching of English,
Parker, P. D., Marsh, H. W., Ciarrochi, J., Marshall, S., & Abduljabbar, A. S. (2014). Juxtaposing math self-efficacy and self-concept as predictors of long-term achievement outcomes. Educational Psychology,
Penner, A. M. (2008). Gender differences in extreme mathematical achievement: An inter- national perspective on biological and social factors. American Journal of Sociology, 114(S1), S138–S170.
Penner, A. M., & Paret, M. (2008). Gender differences in mathematics achievement: Exploring the early grades and the extremes. Social Science Research, 37(1), 239–253
Pfeffermann, D., Skinner, C. J., Holmes, D. J., Goldstein, H., & Rasbash, J. (1998). Weighting for unequal selection probabilities in multilevel models. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B,
Rohde, T. E., & Thompson, L. A. (2007). Predicting academic achievement with cognitive ability. Intelligence,
Rubin, D. B. (1987). Multiple imputation for nonresponse in surveys. Hoboken: Wiley.
Rutkowski, L., Gonzalez, E., Joncas, M., & von Davier, M. (2010). International large-scale assessment data: Issues in secondary analysis and reporting. Educational Researcher,
39(2), 142–151. doi:10.3102/0013189X10363170.
Sadler, P. M., & Tai, R. H. (2007). The two high-school pillars supporting college science. Science,
317(5837), 457–458. doi:10.1126/science.1144214.
Sass, T. R. (2015). Understanding the STEM pipeline (Working Paper No. 125). National Center for Analysis of Longitudinal Data in Education Research.
Schafer, J. L., & Olsen, M. K. (1998). Multiple imputation for multivariate missing-data problems: A data analyst’s perspective. Multivariate Behavioral Research,
33(4), 545–571. doi:10.1207/s15327906mbr3304_5.
Shoemaker, D. M. (1973). Principles and procedures of multiple matrix sampling. Oxford: Ballinger.
Stoet, G., & Geary, D. C. (2013). Sex differences in mathematics and reading achievement are inversely related: Within- and across-nation assessment of 10 years of PISA Data. PLoS ONE,
8(3), e57988. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0057988.
Stoet, G., & Geary, D. C. (2015). Sex differences in academic achievement are not related to political, economic, or social equality. Intelligence,
The Education Bureau. (2016). Promotion of stem education: Unleashing potentials in innovation. Hong Kong: The Education Bureau of Hong Kong.
von Davier, M., Gonzalez, E., & Mislevy, R. J. (2009). What are plausible values and why are they useful? In M. von Davier & D. Hastedt (Eds.), (Vol. 2, pp. 9–36). Princeton, NJ: IEA-ETS Research Institute.
Wang, X. (2013). Why students choose stem majors: Motivation, high school learning, and postsecondary context of support. American Educational Research Journal, 50(5), 1081–1121.
World Economic Forum. (2015). The global gender gap report.
Wooldridge, J. M. (2010). Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data (2nd ed.). Cambridge: The MIT Press.