The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher

, Volume 26, Issue 3–4, pp 193–204 | Cite as

Students’ Self-Efficacy and Attitudes Toward Web-Based Recipe Learning in Taiwan Culinary Education

Regular Article

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to explore the relationships between the self-efficacies and the attitudes toward Web-based Recipe Learning (WRL) of 296 culinary college students in Taiwan. Factors of the WRL Self-Efficacy Scale and the WRL Attitudes Scale were identified in this study using exploratory factor analyses. Both scales showed a good inter-correlation matrix. Correlation and mediational effect analyses were used to examine the relationships between the students’ self-efficacy and attitudes, and several significant findings are reported. First, students’ self-efficacies had positive relations with their attitudes toward WRL. In addition, students’ ‘Ingredient Recognition’ self-efficacy was found to significantly predict the other two dimensions of self-efficacy: ‘Knife Skills’ and ‘Cooking Procedure.’ Moreover, students’ ‘Ingredient Recognition’ self-efficacy was found to significantly predict their WRL attitudes of ‘Usefulness’ via a mediated variable, ‘Cooking Procedure’ self-efficacy. To sum up, the results suggest that ‘Ingredient Recognition’ is a fundamental level of WRL self-efficacy, while both ‘Knife Skills’ and ‘Cooking Procedure’ are advanced levels of WRL self-efficacies. And, when considering the mediational effect, culinary college students’ self-efficacy for cooking procedure is an important mediator between the fundamental self-efficacy and attitudes in web-based culinary learning.

Keywords

Web-based learning Recipe learning Self-efficacy Attitudes Culinary education 

References

  1. Ali, A., Murphy, H. C., & Nadkarni, S. (2014). Hospitality students’ perceptions of digital tools for learning and sustainable development. Journal of Hospitality Leisure Sport & Tourism Education, 15, 1–10. doi:10.1016/j.jhlste.2014.02.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bandura, A. (1996). Multifaced impact of self-efficacy beliefs on academic functioning. Child Development, 67, 1206–1222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bandura, A. (2006). Guide for constructing self-efficacy scales. In F. Pajares & T. Urdan (Eds.), Adolescence and education (Vol. 5, pp. 307–337)., Self-efficacy and adolescence Greenwich, CT: Information Age.Google Scholar
  5. Brumini, G., Spalj, S., Mavrinac, M., Biocina-Lukenda, D., Strujic, M., & Brumini, M. (2014). Attitudes towards e-learning amongst dental students at the universities in Croatia. European Journal of Dental Education, 18(1), 15–23. doi:10.1111/eje.12068.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chan, Y. H. (2003). Biostatistics 101: Data presentation. Singapore Medical Journal, 44(6), 280–285.Google Scholar
  7. Chang, C. S., Liu, E. Z. F., Sung, H. Y., Lin, C. H., Chen, N. S., & Cheng, S. S. (2014). Effects of online college student’s Internet self-efficacy on learning motivation and performance. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 51(4), 366–377. doi:10.1080/14703297.2013.771429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cheng, S. Y. (2013). An empirical investigation of the effectiveness of project-based course learning within hospitality programs: The mediating role of cognitive engagement. Journal of Hospitality Leisure Sport & Tourism Education, 13, 213–225. doi:10.1016/j.jhlste.2013.10.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chiu, Y. L., & Tsai, C. C. (2014). The roles of social factor and internet self-efficacy in nurses’ web-based continuing learning. Nurse Education Today, 34(3), 446–450. doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2013.04.013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chu, R. J., & Chu, A. Z. (2010). Multi-level analysis of peer support, Internet self-efficacy and e-learning outcomes—the contextual effects of collectivism and group potency. Computers & Education, 55(1), 145–154. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2009.12.011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chuang, S. C., Lin, F. M., & Tsai, C. C. (2015). An exploration of the relationship between Internet self-efficacy and sources of internet self-efficacy among Taiwanese university students. Computers in Human Behavior, 48, 147–155. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2015.01.044.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Condrasky, M. D., Williams, J. E., Catalano, P. M., & Griffin, S. F. (2011). Development of psychosocial scales for evaluating the impact of a culinary nutrition education program on cooking and healthful eating. Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior, 43(6), 511–516. doi:10.1016/j.jneb.2010.09.013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cunningham-Sabo, L., & Lohse, B. (2014). Impact of a school-based cooking curriculum for fourth-grade students on attitudes and behaviors is influenced by gender and prior cooking experience. Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior, 46(2), 110–120. doi:10.1016/j.jneb.2013.09.007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. De Backer, C. J. S., & Hudders, L. (2016). Look who’s cooking. Investigating the relationship between watching educational and edutainment TV cooking shows, eating habits and everyday cooking practices among men and women in Belgium. Appetite, 96, 494–501. doi:10.1016/j.appet.2015.10.016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Heusdens, W. T., Bakker, A., Baartman, L. K. J., & De Bruijn, E. (2016). Contextualising vocational knowledge: A theoretical framework and illustrations from culinary education. Vocations and Learning, 9(1), 1–15. doi:10.1007/s12186-015-9145-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hsu, L. W. (2015). Modelling determinants for the integration of Web 2.0 technologies into hospitality education: A Taiwanese case. Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 24(4), 625–633. doi:10.1007/s40299-014-0208-z.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Jonasson, C. (2015). Interactional processes of handling errors in vocational school: Students attending to changes in vocational practices. Vocations and Learning, 8(1), 75–93. doi:10.1007/s12186-014-9124-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kao, C. P., & Tsai, C. C. (2009). Teachers’ attitudes toward web-based professional development, with relation to Internet self-efficacy and beliefs about web-based learning. Computers & Education, 53(1), 66–73. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2008.12.019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kapucu, S., & Bahcivan, E. (2015). High school students’ scientific epistemological beliefs, self-efficacy in learning physics and attitudes toward physics: A structural equation model. Research in Science & Technological Education, 33(2), 252–267. doi:10.1080/02635143.2015.1039976.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Katz, D. (1960). The functional approach to the study of attitudes. Public Opinion Quarterly, 24, 163–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Ko, W. H. (2012). A study of the relationships among effective learning, professional competence, and learning performance in culinary field. Journal of Hospitality Leisure Sport & Tourism Education, 11(1), 12–20. doi:10.1016/j.jhlste.2012.02.010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kuo, Y. C., Walker, A. E., Schroder, K. E. E., & Belland, B. R. (2014). Interaction, Internet self-efficacy, and self-regulated learning as predictors of student satisfaction in online education courses. Internet and Higher Education, 20, 35–50. doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2013.10.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Liang, J. C., Wu, S. H., & Tsai, C. C. (2011). Nurses’ Internet self-efficacy and attitudes toward web-based continuing learning. Nurse Education Today, 31(8), 768–773. doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2010.11.021.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Liburd, J. J., & Christensen, I. M. F. (2013). Using web 2.0 in higher tourism education. Journal of Hospitality Leisure Sport & Tourism Education, 12(1), 99–108. doi:10.1016/j.jhlste.2012.09.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Mejia, C., & Phelan, K. V. (2013). Normative factors influencing hospitality instructors to teach online. Journal of Hospitality Leisure Sport & Tourism Education, 13, 168–179. doi:10.1016/j.jhlste.2013.09.005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Mulligan, A., & Mabe, M. (2011). The effect of the internet on researcher motivations, behaviour and attitudes. Journal of Documentation, 67(2), 290–311. doi:10.1108/00220411111109485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Peng, H. Y., Tsai, C. C., & Wu, Y. T. (2006). University students’ self-efficacy and their attitudes toward the internet: the role of students’ perceptions of the internet. Educational Studies, 32(1), 73–86. doi:10.1080/03055690500416025.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Schwarz, N., & Bohner, G. (2001). The construction of attitudes. In A. Tesser & N. Schwarz (Eds.), Blackwell handbook of social psychology: Intraindividual processes (Vol. 1, pp. 436–457). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  29. Shen, D. M., Cho, M. H., Tsai, C. L., & Marra, R. (2013). Unpacking online learning experiences: Online learning self-efficacy and learning satisfaction. Internet and Higher Education, 19, 10–17. doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2013.04.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Sigala, M. (2012). Investigating the role and impact of geovisualisation and geocollaborative portals on collaborative e-learning in tourism education. Journal of Hospitality Leisure Sport & Tourism Education, 11(1), 50–66. doi:10.1016/j.jhlste.2012.02.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Sun, J. C. Y., & Rueda, R. (2012). Situational interest, computer self-efficacy and self-regulation: Their impact on student engagement in distance education. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43(2), 191–204. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2010.01157.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Sung, S. C., Huang, H. C., & Lin, M. H. (2015). Relationship between the knowledge, attitude, and self-efficacy on sexual health care for nursing students. Journal of Professional Nursing, 31(3), 254–261. doi:10.1016/j.profnurs.2014.11.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Teng, C. C. (2013). Developing and evaluating a hospitality skill module for enhancing performance of undergraduate hospitality students. Journal of Hospitality Leisure Sport & Tourism Education, 13, 78–86. doi:10.1016/j.jhlste.2013.07.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Tsai, C. C., Chuang, S. C., Liang, J. C., & Tsai, M. J. (2011). Self-efficacy in internet-based learning environments: A literature review. Educational Technology & Society, 14(4), 222–240.Google Scholar
  35. Tsai, C.-C., Lin, S. S. J., & Tsai, M.-J. (2001). Developing an internet attitude scale for high school students. Computers & Education, 37, 41–51. doi:10.1016/S0360-1315(01)00033-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Tsai, M. J., & Tsai, C. C. (2003). Information searching strategies in Web-based science learning: The role of Internet self-efficacy. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 40(1), 43–50. doi:10.1080/135500032000038822.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Tsai, M. J., & Tsai, C. C. (2010). Junior high school students’ Internet usage and self-efficacy: A re-examination of the gender gap. Computers & Education, 54(4), 1182–1192. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2009.11.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Tsai, P. S., Tsai, C. C., & Hwang, G. H. (2010). Elementary school students’ attitudes and self-efficacy of using PDAs in a ubiquitous learning context. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 26(3), 297–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Tsai, M. J., Hsu, C. Y., & Tsai, C. C. (2012). Investigation of high school students’ online science information searching performance: The role of implicit and explicit strategies. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 21(2), 246–254. doi:10.1007/s10956-011-9307-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Uitto, A. (2014). Interest, attitudes and self-efficacy beliefs explaining upper-secondary school students’ orientation towards biology-related careers. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 12(6), 1425–1444. doi:10.1007/s10763-014-9516-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Wang, C.-Y., Tsai, M.-J., & Tsai, C.-C. (2016). Multimedia recipe reading: Predicting learning outcomes and diagnosing cooking interest using eye-tracking measures. Computers in Human Behavior, 62(3), 9–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Wang, Y.-L., Tsai, C.-C., & Wei, S.-H. (2015). The sources of science teaching self-efficacy among elementary school teachers: A mediational model approach. International Journal of Science Education, 37, 2264–2283. doi:10.1080/09500693.2015.1075077.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Worsley, A., Wang, W., Ismail, S., & Ridley, S. (2014). Consumers’ interest in learning about cooking: the influence of age, gender and education. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 38(3), 258–264. doi:10.1111/ijcs.12089.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Wu, Y. T., & Tsai, C. C. (2006). University students’ Internet attitudes and Internet self-efficacy: A study at three universities in Taiwan. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 9(4), 441–450. doi:10.1089/cpb.2006.9.441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Yeh, I. J., Kao, C. P., Huang, C. H., & Chang, K. W. (2013). Exploring adult learners’ preferences toward online learning environments: The role of internet self-efficacy and attitudes. Anthropologist, 16(3), 487–494.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© De La Salle University 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Graduate Institute of Applied Science and TechnologyNational Taiwan University of Science and TechnologyTaipeiTaiwan
  2. 2.Graduate Institute of Digital Learning and EducationNational Taiwan University of Science and TechnologyTaipeiTaiwan

Personalised recommendations