Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Effects of Virtual Reality Learning Environment on Student Cognitive and Linguistic Development

The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Cite this article

Abstract

Virtual reality (VR) has brought about numerous alternative learning opportunities in the last decade, and with modern products such as Oculus Rift and other wearable Virtual Reality technologies being introduced into society, VR will promisingly continue to provide yet unseen opportunities in the next few decades and therefore is a technology that deserves serious consideration and study. In an attempt to better understand how virtual worlds positively affect student learning, this study used an online 3D VR English language learning platform and conducted an experiment to evaluate the student learning effectiveness based on Bloom’s cognitive complexity level. t test analysis was used to determine the effectiveness of the learning platform, while structural equation modeling (SEM) analysis was used to determine the learning model behind the pedagogy. Participants were 448 students at a science and technology university in Taiwan. Results show that students improved their phonological, morphological, grammar and syntax knowledge, and virtual world learning assisted in the development of a more complex and higher level of thinking. The SEM analysis results indicated the virtual learning environment with unique features of immersion and ease of use, together with help-seeking positively affected student language cognition.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

References

  • Anderson, L. W., & Sosniak, L. A. (1994). Bloom's taxonomy: A forty-year retrospective. Ninety-third Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education. Chicago, NSSE: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Antonacci, D., DiBartolo, S., Edwards, N., Fritch, K., McMullen, B., & Murch-Shafer, R. (2008). The power of virtual worlds in education: A second life primer and resource for exploring the potential of virtual worlds to impact teaching and learning. Angel Learning White Paper.

  • Antonacci, D., & Modaress, N. (2005). Second life: The educational possibilities of a massively multiplayer virtual world (MMVW). In EDUCAUSE Western Regional Conference-Winds of Change: Charting the Course for Technology in Challenging Times, San Francisco, April 26 (Vol. 28).

  • Bailenson, J. N., Yee, N., Blascovich, J., Beall, A. C., Lundblad, N., & Jin, M. (2008). The use of immersive virtual reality in the learning sciences: Digital transformations of teachers, students, and social context. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 17(1), 102–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bell, J. T. & Fogler, H. S. (1995). The investigation and application of virtual reality as an educational tool. Reprinted from the Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education 1995 Annual Conference.

  • Berman, R. A. (2007). Developing linguistic knowledge and language use across adolescence. In E. Hoff & M. Shatz (Eds.), Blackwell handbook of language development (pp. 347–367). Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Buck, D., & Stucki, D. (2000). Design early considered harmful: Graduated exposure to complexity and structure based on levels of cognitive development. Paper: Mathematics Faculty Scholarship. 12.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Chuang, S.-C., & Tsai, C.-C. (2004). A survey on the perceptions toward the Internet-based learning environments among Taiwanese secondary school students: Differences between preferred and actual forms. Journal of National University of Tainan, 38(2), 55–70. (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, D. (2006). Motivation in e-learning, Março. Retrieved June 30, 2015, from http://www.epic.co.uk.

  • Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Figueiredo, A. D. (Ed.). (2005). Managing learning in virtual settings: The role of context. Hershey: IGI Global.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dreher, C., Reiners, T., Dreher, N., & Dreher, H. (2009). Virtual worlds as a context suited for information systems education: Discussion of pedagogical experience and curriculum design with reference to Secon Life. Journal of Information Systems Education, 20(2), 211–224.

    Google Scholar 

  • Falloon, G. (2010). Using avatars and virtual environments in learning: What do they have to offer? British Journal of Educational Technology, 41(1), 108–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forehand, M. (2005). Bloom’s taxonomy: Original and revised. In M. Orey (Ed.), Emerging perspectives on learning, teaching, and technology. Retrieved March 15, 2016, from http://epltt.coe.uga.edu.

  • Goodhue, D. L., & Thompson, R. L. (1995). Task-technology fit and individual performance. MIS Quarterly, 19(2), 213–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hew, K., & Cheung, W. (2010). Use of three-dimensional (3-D) immersive virtual worlds in K-12 and higher education settings: A review of the research. British Journal of Educational Technology, 41, 33–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang, H. M., Rauch, U., & Liaw, S. S. (2010). Investigating learners’ attitudes toward virtual reality learning environments: Based on a constructivist approach. Computers & Education, 55(3), 1171–1182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inman, C., Wright, V. H., & Hartman, J. A. (2010). Use of second life in K-12 and higher education: A review of research. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 9(1), 44–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jarmon, L., Traphagan, T., Mayrath, M., & Trivedi, A. (2009). Virtual world teaching, experiential learning and assessment: An interdisciplinary communication course in second life. Computers & Education, 53, 169–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kastoudi, D. (2012). Using a quest in a 3D virtual environment for student interaction and vocabulary acquisition in foreign language learning. In The EUROCALL Review. Proceedings of the EUROCALL 2011 Conference, 20, 87–89.

  • Kaya, M. H. (2015). The role of technology in an emerging ELT constructivist pedagogy, Humanising Language Teaching, 1, Retrieved February 28, 2016, from http://www.hltmag.co.uk/feb15/sart06.htm.

  • Krathwohl, D. R. (2002). A revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy: An overview. Theory into Practice, 41(4), 212–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, Y., Kozar, K. A., & Larsen, K. R. T. (2003). The technology acceptance model: Past, present, and future. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 12(1), 752–780.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin, C.-S., & Kuo, M. S. (2005). Adaptive networked learning environments using learning objects, learner profiles and inhabited virtual learning worlds. In Proceedings of IEEE ICALT2005: The 5th International Conference on Advanced Learning Technology (pp. 116–118). Kaohsiung, Taiwan.

  • Maor, D. (1999). A teacher professional development program on using a constructivist multimedia learning environment. Learning Environments Research, 2(3), 307–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maruyama, G. (1998). Basics of structural equation modeling. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Noble, T. (2004). Integrating the revised Bloom’s Taxonomy with multiple intelligences: A planning tool for curriculum differentiation. Teacher College Record, 106(2), 193–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Overbaugh, R. C., & Lin, S. (2004). Student characteristics, sense of community, and cognitive achievement in web-based and lab-based learning environments. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 39(2), 205–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paul, R. W. (1985). Bloom’s Taxonomy and critical thinking instruction. Educational Leadership, 42(8), 36–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, M. (2006). Learner interaction management in an avatar and chat-based virtual world. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 19(1), 79–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pinho, M. S., Bawman, D. A., & Freitas, C. (2009). Cooperative object manipulation in collaborative virtual environments. Journal of the Brazilian Computer Society, 14(2), 54–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robers, L. D., Smith, L. M., & Pollock, C. M. (2000). U r a lot bolder on the net. In W. R. Crozier (Ed.), Shyness: Development, consolidation and change. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandars, J., & Morrison, C. (2007). What is the Net Generation? The challenge for future medical education. Medical Teacher, 29(2/3), 85–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Savin-Baden, M. (2010). A practical guide to using second life in higher education. New York, NY: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scherman, W. R., & Craig, A. B. (2003). Understanding virtual reality. New York: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stæhr, L. S. (2009). Vocabulary knowledge and advanced listening comprehension in English as a foreign language. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 31(4), 577–607.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Su, Y.-C. (2006). EFL teachers’ perceptions of English language policy at the elementary level in Taiwan. Educational Studies, 32(3), 265–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Svensson, P. (2003). Virtual worlds as arenas for language learning. In U. Felix (Ed.), Language learning online: Toward best practice (pp. 123–146). Lisse, The Netherlands: Swets & Zeitlinger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, B. (2000). Ten commandments of structural equation modeling. In L. G. Grimm & P. R. Yarnold (Eds.), Reading and understanding more multivariate statistics (pp. 261–283). Washington, DC: American Psychology Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorsteinsson, G., & Page, T. (2008). Reflecting from the literature on constructivist learning in virtual reality in relation to the FISTE Comenius 2.1 Project. Educatia, 21, 95–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Y., & Braman, J. (2009). Extending the classroom through second life. Journal of Information Systems Education, 20(2), 235–247.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ward, J. (2010). The avatar lecturer: Learning and teaching in second life. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 28(7), 862–881.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by a grant from Taiwan Ministry of Science and Technology No. MOST 103-2410-H-262 -011. I appreciate the reviewers’ valuable comments and suggestions.

Funding

Taiwan Ministry of Science and Technology, Grant No. MOST 103-2410-H-262 -011.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Applied Foreign Languages and Language Center, Graduate Program of Applied Foreign Language in Tourism and MICE Industry, Lunghwa University of Science and Technology, 300, Section 1, Wanshou Road, Guishan Township, Taoyuan County, 33306, Taiwan, ROC

    Yu-Li Chen

Authors
  1. Yu-Li Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yu-Li Chen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chen, YL. The Effects of Virtual Reality Learning Environment on Student Cognitive and Linguistic Development. Asia-Pacific Edu Res 25, 637–646 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-016-0293-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-016-0293-2

Keywords

search

Navigation