Skip to main content

Ecological Leadership: Going Beyond System Leadership for Diffusing School-Based Innovations in the Crucible of Change for 21st Century Learning

Abstract

Driven by the impetus for the school system as a whole to actualize deep twenty-first century learning, innovation diffusion has become increasingly an important vehicle for isolated pockets of successes to proliferate beyond the locale of the individual schools to form connected clusters of improvement at a greater scale. This paper articulates an ecological leadership model for enabling such system-wide innovation diffusion in the context of Singapore. Through the explication of leadership practices demonstrated by two exemplar schools that have successfully levelled up their school-based innovation, we argue that ecological leaders have to go beyond system leadership to think and act in a more encompassing way. Specifically, ecological leaders have to embody systems thinking and East-Asian collectivist beliefs to benefit other schools, converge and contextualize the kernel of innovation, align efforts by mitigating tensions and paradoxes within and across the subsystems in the ecology, leverage on resources in the ecology and manage the emergent dynamics engendered through interactions with multi-level actors. These five thrusts cut across the five dimensions of ecology: microsystem, mesosystem, exosystem, macrosystem and chronosystem. With the favourable socio-political climate that encourages collaboration rather than competition, we posit that leaders can endeavour to forge ecological coherence. This can be achieved by establishing synergistic structural and socio-cultural connections within and across the five subsystems of influences underpinning the hub school and networks of innovation-adopting schools, thus bringing forth transformative changes in the system.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Notes

  1. Figures provided by the school.

References

  • Bain, A. (2007). The self organizing school: Next generation comprehensive school reforms. Lanham MD: Rowman and Littlefield Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bottery, M. (2004). Leading teachers, leading schools: The challenges of educational leadership: Values in a globalized age. London: SAGE Publications Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bronfenbrenner, U. (1993). Ecological models of human development. In M. Gauvain & M. Cole (Eds.), Readings on the development of children (pp. 37–43). NY: Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chua, P. M. H., Hatch, T. & Faughey, D. (2014, 25 March). centralized–decentralization emerging in Singapore [blog post]. Retrieved from http://internationalednews.com/2014/03/25/centralized-decentralization-emerging-in-singapore/.

  • Coppola, E. (2004). Powering up: Learning to teach well with technology. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cravens, X. C., & Hallinger, P. (2012). School leadership and change in East Asia: Building capacity for education reform. Peabody Journal of Education, 87(2), 157–161.

  • Dimmock, C., Kwek, D., & Toh, Y. (2013). Leadership for twenty first century learning in Singapore’s high-performing schools. IN OECD (ED.), Leadership for twenty first century learning (pp. 107–134). Paris: OECD Publishing.

  • Dimmock, C., & Tan, C. Y. (2013). Educational leadership in Singapore: Tight coupling, sustainability, scalability, and succession. Journal of Educational Administration, 51(3), 320–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fullan, M. (2004). Systems thinkers in action: Moving beyond the standards plateau: Teachers transforming teaching. London: Department for Education and Skills.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fullan, M. (2014a). The Principal: Three keys to maximizing impact. California: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fullan, M. (2014b, April). School leaders maximizing impact. Paper presented at the Education Leadership Summit 2014, Singapore.

  • Fullan, M., & Langworthy, M. (2014). A rich seam: How new pedagogies find deep learning. London: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glazer, J. L., & Peurach, D. J. (2012). School improvement networks as a strategy for large-scale education reform: The role of educational environments. Educational Policy, 27(4), 1–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodlad, J. I. (2001). An ecological version of accountability. Theory into Practice, 17(5), 308–315.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greany, T. (2014, March 18). The self-improving school system: competing policies undermine the coalition’s admirable aims [blog post]. Retrieved from http://ioelondonblog.wordpress.com/2014/03/06/the-self-improving-school-system-competing-policies-undermine-the-coalitions-admirable-aims/.

  • Hargreaves, D. H. (2010). Creating a self-improving school system. Nottingham: National College for School Leadership.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hargreaves, D. H. (2011). Leading a self-improving system. Nottingham: National College for School Leadership.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hargreaves, D. H. (2012). A self-improving school system: towards maturity. Nottingham: National College for School Leadership.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hargreaves, A., & Shirley, D. (2012). The global fourth way: The Quest for educational excellence. Thousand Oaks: Corwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, A., & Chrispeels, J. H. (Eds.). (2006). Improving schools and educational systems: International perspectives. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ho, P. H. E. (2008). Governance at the leading edge: Black swans, wild cards, and wicked problems. Ethos, 4, 74–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopkins, D., (2001). Instructional Leadership and School Improvement. NCSL The Knowledge Pool.

  • Hopkins, D. (2007). Every school a great school: Realizing the potential of system leadership. New York: McGraw-Hill International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopkins, D., & Higham, R. (2007). System leadership: mapping the landscape. School leadership and management, 27(2), 147–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jennings, P., & Dooley, K. (2007). Introduction to complex systems leadership theory: An emerging paradigm. In J. K. Hazy, J. A. Goldstein, & B. B. Lichtenstein (Eds.), Complex systems leadership theory (pp. 17–34). Mansfield: ISCE Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kofman, F., & Senge, P. M. (1995). Communities of commitment: the heart of learning organisations. In S. Chawla & J. Renesch (Eds.), Learning organisations: Developing cultures for tomorrow’s workplace. Oregon: Productivity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kong, L., & Yeoh, B. S. A. (2003). The politics of landscapes in Singapore: Constructions of “Nation”. Syracuse: Syracuse University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, H. L. (2014, March 30). Social safety nets will be strengthened: PM Lee. Today Online. Retrieved from http://www.todayonline.com/singapore/social-safety-nets-will-be-strengthened-pm-lee.

  • Looi, C.-K., Sun, D., Seow, P., & Chia, G. (2014). Enacting a technology-based science curriculum across a grade level: The journey of teachers’ appropriation. Computers and Education, 71, 222–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Education, Singapore. (2014). Information sheet on twenty first century competencies. Retrieved from July 23, 2014 http://www.moe.gov.sg/media/press/2014/04/information-sheet-on-twentyfirst-century.php.

  • Morrison, K. R. B. (2002). School leadership and complexity theory. London: Routledge, Falmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2013). Leadership for twenty first century learning, educational research and innovation. Paris: OECD Publishing. doi:10.1787/9789264205406-en.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olsson, P., Folke, C., & Berkes, F. (2004). Adaptive co-management for building social-ecological resilience. Environmental Management, 34, 75–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rowan, B. (2002). The ecology of school improvement: Notes on the school improvement industry in the United States. Journal of Educational Change, 3(3–4), 283–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stake, R. (1995). The art of case study research (pp. 49–68). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toh, Y. (2013). Sustaining the use of ICT for student-centred learning: A case study of technology leadershipin a Singapore ICT-enriched primary school. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Leicester. Retrieved from https://lra.le.ac.uk/handle/2381/27830.

  • Wheatley, M. (2006). Leadership and the new science: Discovering order in a chaotic world. San francisco: Berrett-Koehler.

  • Wheatley, M., & Frieze, D. (2009). Taking social innovation to scale. Oxford Leadership Journal, 1(1), 1–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wielkiewicz, R. M., & Stelzner, S. P. (2005). An ecological perspective on leadership theory, research, and practice. Review of General Psychology, 9(4), 326–341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yancy Toh.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Toh, Y., Jamaludin, A., Hung, W.L.D. et al. Ecological Leadership: Going Beyond System Leadership for Diffusing School-Based Innovations in the Crucible of Change for 21st Century Learning. Asia-Pacific Edu Res 23, 835–850 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-014-0211-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-014-0211-4

Keywords

  • Ecological leadership
  • Systems leadership
  • Scaling and diffusion
  • Ecological coherence
  • School-based innovations
  • East-Asian collectivism