The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher

, Volume 23, Issue 4, pp 835–850

Ecological Leadership: Going Beyond System Leadership for Diffusing School-Based Innovations in the Crucible of Change for 21st Century Learning

  • Yancy Toh
  • Azilawati Jamaludin
  • Wei Loong David Hung
  • Paul Meng-Huat Chua
Regular Article

Abstract

Driven by the impetus for the school system as a whole to actualize deep twenty-first century learning, innovation diffusion has become increasingly an important vehicle for isolated pockets of successes to proliferate beyond the locale of the individual schools to form connected clusters of improvement at a greater scale. This paper articulates an ecological leadership model for enabling such system-wide innovation diffusion in the context of Singapore. Through the explication of leadership practices demonstrated by two exemplar schools that have successfully levelled up their school-based innovation, we argue that ecological leaders have to go beyond system leadership to think and act in a more encompassing way. Specifically, ecological leaders have to embody systems thinking and East-Asian collectivist beliefs to benefit other schools, converge and contextualize the kernel of innovation, align efforts by mitigating tensions and paradoxes within and across the subsystems in the ecology, leverage on resources in the ecology and manage the emergent dynamics engendered through interactions with multi-level actors. These five thrusts cut across the five dimensions of ecology: microsystem, mesosystem, exosystem, macrosystem and chronosystem. With the favourable socio-political climate that encourages collaboration rather than competition, we posit that leaders can endeavour to forge ecological coherence. This can be achieved by establishing synergistic structural and socio-cultural connections within and across the five subsystems of influences underpinning the hub school and networks of innovation-adopting schools, thus bringing forth transformative changes in the system.

Keywords

Ecological leadership Systems leadership Scaling and diffusion Ecological coherence School-based innovations East-Asian collectivism 

References

  1. Bain, A. (2007). The self organizing school: Next generation comprehensive school reforms. Lanham MD: Rowman and Littlefield Education.Google Scholar
  2. Bottery, M. (2004). Leading teachers, leading schools: The challenges of educational leadership: Values in a globalized age. London: SAGE Publications Ltd.Google Scholar
  3. Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Bronfenbrenner, U. (1993). Ecological models of human development. In M. Gauvain & M. Cole (Eds.), Readings on the development of children (pp. 37–43). NY: Freeman.Google Scholar
  5. Chua, P. M. H., Hatch, T. & Faughey, D. (2014, 25 March). centralized–decentralization emerging in Singapore [blog post]. Retrieved from http://internationalednews.com/2014/03/25/centralized-decentralization-emerging-in-singapore/.
  6. Coppola, E. (2004). Powering up: Learning to teach well with technology. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  7. Cravens, X. C., & Hallinger, P. (2012). School leadership and change in East Asia: Building capacity for education reform. Peabody Journal of Education, 87(2), 157–161.Google Scholar
  8. Dimmock, C., Kwek, D., & Toh, Y. (2013). Leadership for twenty first century learning in Singapore’s high-performing schools. IN OECD (ED.), Leadership for twenty first century learning (pp. 107–134). Paris: OECD Publishing.Google Scholar
  9. Dimmock, C., & Tan, C. Y. (2013). Educational leadership in Singapore: Tight coupling, sustainability, scalability, and succession. Journal of Educational Administration, 51(3), 320–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fullan, M. (2004). Systems thinkers in action: Moving beyond the standards plateau: Teachers transforming teaching. London: Department for Education and Skills.Google Scholar
  11. Fullan, M. (2014a). The Principal: Three keys to maximizing impact. California: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  12. Fullan, M. (2014b, April). School leaders maximizing impact. Paper presented at the Education Leadership Summit 2014, Singapore.Google Scholar
  13. Fullan, M., & Langworthy, M. (2014). A rich seam: How new pedagogies find deep learning. London: Pearson.Google Scholar
  14. Glazer, J. L., & Peurach, D. J. (2012). School improvement networks as a strategy for large-scale education reform: The role of educational environments. Educational Policy, 27(4), 1–35.Google Scholar
  15. Goodlad, J. I. (2001). An ecological version of accountability. Theory into Practice, 17(5), 308–315.Google Scholar
  16. Greany, T. (2014, March 18). The self-improving school system: competing policies undermine the coalition’s admirable aims [blog post]. Retrieved from http://ioelondonblog.wordpress.com/2014/03/06/the-self-improving-school-system-competing-policies-undermine-the-coalitions-admirable-aims/.
  17. Hargreaves, D. H. (2010). Creating a self-improving school system. Nottingham: National College for School Leadership.Google Scholar
  18. Hargreaves, D. H. (2011). Leading a self-improving system. Nottingham: National College for School Leadership.Google Scholar
  19. Hargreaves, D. H. (2012). A self-improving school system: towards maturity. Nottingham: National College for School Leadership.Google Scholar
  20. Hargreaves, A., & Shirley, D. (2012). The global fourth way: The Quest for educational excellence. Thousand Oaks: Corwin.Google Scholar
  21. Harris, A., & Chrispeels, J. H. (Eds.). (2006). Improving schools and educational systems: International perspectives. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  22. Ho, P. H. E. (2008). Governance at the leading edge: Black swans, wild cards, and wicked problems. Ethos, 4, 74–79.Google Scholar
  23. Hopkins, D., (2001). Instructional Leadership and School Improvement. NCSL The Knowledge Pool.Google Scholar
  24. Hopkins, D. (2007). Every school a great school: Realizing the potential of system leadership. New York: McGraw-Hill International.Google Scholar
  25. Hopkins, D., & Higham, R. (2007). System leadership: mapping the landscape. School leadership and management, 27(2), 147–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Jennings, P., & Dooley, K. (2007). Introduction to complex systems leadership theory: An emerging paradigm. In J. K. Hazy, J. A. Goldstein, & B. B. Lichtenstein (Eds.), Complex systems leadership theory (pp. 17–34). Mansfield: ISCE Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  27. Kofman, F., & Senge, P. M. (1995). Communities of commitment: the heart of learning organisations. In S. Chawla & J. Renesch (Eds.), Learning organisations: Developing cultures for tomorrow’s workplace. Oregon: Productivity Press.Google Scholar
  28. Kong, L., & Yeoh, B. S. A. (2003). The politics of landscapes in Singapore: Constructions of “Nation”. Syracuse: Syracuse University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Lee, H. L. (2014, March 30). Social safety nets will be strengthened: PM Lee. Today Online. Retrieved from http://www.todayonline.com/singapore/social-safety-nets-will-be-strengthened-pm-lee.
  30. Looi, C.-K., Sun, D., Seow, P., & Chia, G. (2014). Enacting a technology-based science curriculum across a grade level: The journey of teachers’ appropriation. Computers and Education, 71, 222–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Ministry of Education, Singapore. (2014). Information sheet on twenty first century competencies. Retrieved from July 23, 2014 http://www.moe.gov.sg/media/press/2014/04/information-sheet-on-twentyfirst-century.php.
  32. Morrison, K. R. B. (2002). School leadership and complexity theory. London: Routledge, Falmer.Google Scholar
  33. OECD. (2013). Leadership for twenty first century learning, educational research and innovation. Paris: OECD Publishing. doi:10.1787/9789264205406-en.Google Scholar
  34. Olsson, P., Folke, C., & Berkes, F. (2004). Adaptive co-management for building social-ecological resilience. Environmental Management, 34, 75–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Rowan, B. (2002). The ecology of school improvement: Notes on the school improvement industry in the United States. Journal of Educational Change, 3(3–4), 283–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Stake, R. (1995). The art of case study research (pp. 49–68). Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  37. Toh, Y. (2013). Sustaining the use of ICT for student-centred learning: A case study of technology leadershipin a Singapore ICT-enriched primary school. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Leicester. Retrieved from https://lra.le.ac.uk/handle/2381/27830.
  38. Wheatley, M. (2006). Leadership and the new science: Discovering order in a chaotic world. San francisco: Berrett-Koehler.Google Scholar
  39. Wheatley, M., & Frieze, D. (2009). Taking social innovation to scale. Oxford Leadership Journal, 1(1), 1–5.Google Scholar
  40. Wielkiewicz, R. M., & Stelzner, S. P. (2005). An ecological perspective on leadership theory, research, and practice. Review of General Psychology, 9(4), 326–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© De La Salle University 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yancy Toh
    • 1
  • Azilawati Jamaludin
    • 1
  • Wei Loong David Hung
    • 1
  • Paul Meng-Huat Chua
    • 1
  1. 1.Office of Education Research, National Institute of EducationNanyang Technological UniversitySingaporeSingapore

Personalised recommendations