The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher

, Volume 24, Issue 1, pp 201–209 | Cite as

Ethical Learning Experiences and Engagement in Academic Dishonesty: A Study of Asian and European Pharmacy and Medical Students in New Zealand

  • Marcus A. Henning
  • Phillipa Malpas
  • Emmanuel Manalo
  • Sanya Ram
  • Vidushan Vijayakumar
  • Susan J. Hawken
Regular Article

Abstract

In higher education in New Zealand, there is a burgeoning interest in, and concern with, the way students conduct themselves in their learning practices. Engagement in academically honest and dishonest behaviours is a crucial area of study within higher education. To operationalize effective teaching and assessment, it is critically important to consider how different ethnic groups operate within the learning environment when preparing for, and completing, assessments. The present study investigated differences between two ethnic groups studying in New Zealand (Asian and European) with respect to their disclosures of academic dishonesty and engagement with ethical learning experiences (ELE). Responses from 312 pharmacy and medical students were analysed in this study. A questionnaire was designed to elicit responses about engagement in academic dishonesty and ELEs. The findings emphasise that there were low rates of engagement in academically dishonest behaviours by both groups and there were no differences in disclosure of cheating and ELE. The findings showed small but significant differences between Asian and European students with respect to disclosure in the areas of copying and collusion. Subtle interactions were also noted for ethnicity and year of study, and ethnicity and gender, indicating that later year students diverged more than earlier year students and differences were more apparent amongst male students. Lastly, the findings showed that those students who read the student code of conduct were more likely to engage in academically ‘honest’ behaviours. These findings have implications for educationalists throughout the world, and it is possible that the hidden curriculum is playing a strong role in reframing the notion and practice of ethical conduct.

Keywords

Asian students European students Academic dishonesty Ethical learning experiences Pharmacy Medicine New Zealand higher education 

References

  1. Aggarwal, R., Bates, I., Davies, J. G., & Khan, I. (2002). A study of academic dishonesty among students at two pharmacy schools. The Pharmaceutical Journal, 269(7219), 529–533.Google Scholar
  2. Amsberry, D. (2009). Deconstructing plagiarism: International students and textual borrowing practices. The Reference Librarian, 51(1), 31–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Austin, Z., Collins, D., Remillard, A., Kelcher, S., & Chui, S. (2006). Influence of attitudes toward curriculum on dishonest academic behavior. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 70(3), 50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bennett, R. (2005). Factors associated with student plagiarism in a post-1992 university. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 30(2), 137–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bilic-Zulle, L., Frkoviæ, V., Turk, T., Azman, J., & Petroveèki, M. (2005). Prevalence of plagiarism among medical students. Croatian Medical Journal, 46(1), 126–131.Google Scholar
  6. Cheng, K., & Wong, K. (1996). School effectiveness in East Asia: Concepts, origins and implications. Journal of Educational Administration, 34(5), 32–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Coverdale, J., & Henning, M. A. (1998, September 2–4). Cheating by medical students. Paper presented at the Royal Australian and New Zealand Conference of Psychiatrists, Hamilton, New Zealand.Google Scholar
  8. Coverdale, J., & Henning, M. A. (2000). An analysis of cheating behaviours during training by medical students. Medical Teacher, 22(6), 582–586.Google Scholar
  9. Cunha, M. P., Guimarães-Costa, N., Rego, A., & Clegg, S. R. (2010). Leading and following (un) ethically in Limen. Journal of Business Ethics, 97(2), 189–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. De Lambert, K., Ellen, N., & Taylor, L. (2003). Cheating—What is it and why do it: A study in New Zealand tertiary institutions of the perceptions and justifications for academic dishonesty. Journal of American Academy of Business, 3(1/2), 98–103.Google Scholar
  11. Donaldson, L., Qiu, J., & Luo, B. N. (2013). For rigour in organizational management theory research. Journal of Management Studies, 50(1), 153–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Draper, C., & Louw, G. (2007). What is medicine and what is a doctor? Medical students’ perceptions and expectations of their academic and professional career. Medical Teacher, 29(5), 100–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Ercegovac, Z., & Richardson, J. V. (2004). Academic dishonesty, plagiarism included, in the digital age: A literature review. College & Research Libraries, 65(4), 301–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fitzjohn, J., Wilkinson, T., Gill, D., & Mulder, R. (2003). The demographic characteristics of New Zealand medical students: The New Zealand Wellbeing, Intentions, Debt and Experiences (WIDE) Survey of Medical Students 2001 study. New Zealand Medical Journal, 116(1183).Google Scholar
  15. Fletcher, J. F., Greenwood, J., Grimley, M., Parkhill, F., & Davis, N. (2012). What is happening when teachers of 11–13-year-old students take guided reading: A New Zealand snapshot. Educational Review, 64(4), 425–449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Forinash, A. B., Smith, W. T., Gaebelein, C. J., & Garavaglia, J. (2010). Differences in self-reported academically dishonest and nondishonest pharmacy students when rating professional dishonesty scenarios. Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning, 2(2), 100–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gitanjali, B. (2004). Academic dishonesty in Indian medical colleges. Journal of Postgraduate Medicine, 50(4), 281–284.Google Scholar
  18. Granitz, N., & Loewy, D. (2007). Applying ethical theories: Interpreting and responding to student plagiarism. Journal of Business Ethics, 72(3), 293–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Harden, R. M. (2001). AMEE Guide No. 21: Curriculum mapping: A tool for transparent and authentic teaching and learning. Medical Teacher, 23(2), 123–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Harries, R., & Rutter, P. (2005). Cheating by pharmacy students: Perceptions, prevalence and comparisons. Pharmacy Education, 5(1), 53–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hay, D., McCourt Larres, P., Oyelere, P., & Fisher, A. (2001). The ethical perception of undergraduate students in computer-related situations: An analysis of the effects of culture, gender and prior education. Teaching Business Ethics, 5(3), 331–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Henning, M. A., Hawken, S. J., & Hill, A. G. (2009). The quality of life of New Zealand doctors and medical students: What can be done to avoid burnout? The New Zealand Medical Journal, 122(1307), 102–110.Google Scholar
  23. Henning, M. A., Malpas, P., Ram, S., Doherty, I., Kelly, F., & Hawken, S. J. (2011). Can engagement in academic dishonesty be described as planned behaviour or lack of self-control? Pharmacy Education, 11(1), 158–165.Google Scholar
  24. Henning, M. A., Ram, S., Malpas, P., Shulruf, B., Kelly, F., & Hawken, S. J. (2013). Academic dishonesty and ethical reasoning: Pharmacy and medical school students in New Zealand. Medical Teacher, 35(6), e1211–e1217. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2012.737962. Retrieved from http://informahealthcare.com/doi/pdf/10.3109/0142159X.2012.737962.
  25. Hollinger, R. C., & Lanza-Kaduce, L. (2010). Academic dishonesty and the perceived effectiveness of countermeasures: An empirical survey of cheating at a major public university. Journal of Student Affairs Research and Practice, 46(4), 1137–1152.Google Scholar
  26. Holmes, P. (2005). Ethnic Chinese students’ communication with cultural others in a New Zealand university. Communication Education, 54(4), 289–311. doi:10.1080/03634520500442160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Jones, L. R. (2001). Academic integrity and academic dishonesty: A handbook about cheating and plagiarism. Retrieved from https://www.fit.edu/current/documents/plagiarism.pdf.
  28. Kanagawa, C., Cross, S. E., & Markus, H. R. (2001). “Who am I?” The cultural psychology of the conceptual self. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27(1), 90–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kember, D. (2000). Misconceptions about the learning approaches, motivation and study practices of Asian students. Higher Education, 40(1), 99–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Maxwell, A., Curtis, G., & Vardanega, L. (2006). Plagiarism among local and Asian students in Australia. Guidance and Counselling, 21(4), 210–215.Google Scholar
  31. Maxwell, A., Curtis, G. J., & Vardanega, L. (2008). Does culture influence understanding and perceived seriousness of plagiarism. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 4(2), 25–40.Google Scholar
  32. McCabe, D. L., & Trevino, L. K. (1993). Academic dishonesty: Honor codes and other contextual influences. Journal of Higher Education, 64(5), 522–538.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Ministry of Social Development. (2010). Ethnic composition of the population. Retrieved January 21, 2011 from http://www.socialreport.msd.govt.nz/people/ethnic-composition-population.html.
  34. Mu, C. (2007). Marketing academic library resources and information services to international students from Asia. Reference Services Review, 35(4), 571–583.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Muijs, D. (2011). Doing quantitative research in education with SPSS. London: SAGE.Google Scholar
  36. Park-Saltzman, J., Wada, K., & Mogami, T. (2012). Culturally sensitive mentoring for Asian International students in counseling psychology. The Counseling Psychologist. doi: 10.1177/0011000011429831. Retrieved from http://tcp.sagepub.com.ezproxy.auckland.ac.nz/content/early/2012/02/05/0011000011429831.full.pdf+html. Accessed 12 Oct 2012
  37. Pecorari, D. (2003). Good and original: Plagiarism and patchwriting in academic second-language writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 12(4), 317–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Rasanathan, K., Craig, D., & Perkins, R. (2004). IsAsiana useful category for health research in New Zealand. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the Inaugural International Asian health Conference: Asian health and wellbeing, now and into the future, Auckland, School of Population Health, The University of Auckland.Google Scholar
  39. Schafheutle, E. I., Silverthorne, J., Hall, J., Tully, M. P., Noyce, P. R., & David, T. J. (2009, January 23). MPharm student code of conduct: A literature review. Retrieved March 26, 2010 from http://rpsgb.org.uk/pdfs/ccpharmstudentslitrev.pdf.
  40. The University of Auckland. (2011). Academic honesty, cheating and plagiarism. Retrieved September 11, 2011, from http://www.auckland.ac.nz/webdav/site/central/shared/about/teaching-and-learning/academic-honesty-and-plagiarism/about-academic-honesty/academic-honesty-brochure-final.pdf.
  41. Tsai, J. L., Ying, Y. W., & Lee, P. A. (2001). Cultural predictors of self-esteem: A study of Chinese American female and male young adults. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 7(3), 284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Van der Vleuten, C., Schuwirth, L., Driessen, E., Dijkstra, J., Tigelaar, D., Baartman, L., et al. (2012). A model for programmatic assessment fit for purpose. Medical Teacher, 34(3), 205–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Whitley, H. P., & Starr, J. (2010). Academic dishonesty among pharmacy students: Does portable technology play a role? Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning, 2(2), 94–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© De La Salle University 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marcus A. Henning
    • 1
  • Phillipa Malpas
    • 2
  • Emmanuel Manalo
    • 3
  • Sanya Ram
    • 4
  • Vidushan Vijayakumar
    • 5
  • Susan J. Hawken
    • 2
  1. 1.Centre for Medical and Health Sciences EducationUniversity of AucklandAucklandNew Zealand
  2. 2.Department of Psychological Medicine, Faculty of Medical and Health SciencesUniversity of AucklandAucklandNew Zealand
  3. 3.Faculty of Science and EngineeringWaseda UniversityTokyoJapan
  4. 4.School of PharmacyUniversity of AucklandAucklandNew Zealand
  5. 5.University of AucklandAucklandNew Zealand

Personalised recommendations