Skip to main content
Log in

How Do Teachers Learn Through Engaging in School-Based Teacher Learning Activities? Applying a Knowledge Conversion Perspective

  • Regular Article
  • Published:
The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

School-based teacher learning activities constitute a bottom-up approach to knowledge development which encourages teachers to search for good practices based on individual and collective efforts. In China, engaging in these learning programmes has been institutionalized as a daily practice of teachers. This qualitative study uses the concept of ‘knowledge conversion’ as an analytical lens to examine how 35 teachers from three schools in Shanghai develop their knowledge derived from participating in these learning activities. Results show that teachers in China use socialization (tacit knowledge acquired through individual interactions) and externalization (theorizing individual tacit knowledge) to develop sympathized and conceptual knowledge, respectively. However, successful internalization of this knowledge to the point of becoming operationally systematised is rare. Knowledge development in schools seems to involve knowledge adaptation and transfer rather than creation. Most of the teacher-participants apply an ‘exploitative’ learning approach which reinforces and refines existing practices and values in their professional development. However, reprofessionalization of teachers takes place through participating in research projects, writing papers and cases. These activities provide an opportunity for teachers to engage in ‘exploratory’ learning by which teachers can develop innovative practices with support from colleagues or outside experts. This learning approach can lead to both teacher development and school improvement by helping teachers construct their ‘know-why’ knowledge. Importantly, a network of schools and teachers is necessary for establishing an exploratory learning approach. This, however, can result in inequality of learning opportunities for teachers who do not have such networks, which would ultimately limit the effects of such a learning approach.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Antonacopoulou, E. P. (2006). The relationship between individual and organizational learning: New evidence from managerial learning practices. Management Learning, 37(4), 455–473.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bradley-Levine, J., Smith, J., & Carr, K. (2009). The role of action research in empowering teachers to change their practice. Journal of Ethnographic and Qualitative Research, 3(1), 152–161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, A., & McNamara, O. (2010). Mapping the field of practitioner research, inquiry and professional learning in educational contexts. In A. Campbell & S. Groundwater-Smith (Eds.), Connecting inquiry and professional learning in education: International perspectives and practical solutions (pp. 10–25). London: Routledge.

  • Chou, C. H. (2011). Teachers’ professional development: Investigating teachers’ learning to do action research in a professional learning community. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 20(3), 421–437.

    Google Scholar 

  • Craig, C. J. (2009). Teacher research and teacher as researcher. In L. J. Saha & A. G. Dworkin (Eds.), International handbook of research on teachers and teaching (pp. 61–70). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Eraut, M. (2007). Learning from other people in workplace. Oxford Review of Education, 33(4), 403–422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gallucci, C. (2008). Districtwide instructional reform: Using sociocultural theory to link professional learning to organizational support. American Journal of Education, 114, 541–581.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gao, X. S., Barkhuizen, G., & Chow, A. (2010). ‘Nowadays, teachers are relatively obedient’: Understanding primary school English teachers’ conceptions of and drives for research in China. Language Teaching Research, 15(1), 61–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gao, X. S., Barkhuizen, G., & Chow, A. (2011). Research engagement and educational decentralization: Problematising primary school English teachers’ research experiences in China. Educational Studies, 37(2), 207–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hardy, I., & Ronnerman, K. (2011). The value and valuing of continuing professional development: Current dilemmas, future directions and the case for action research. Cambridge Journal of Education, 41(4), 461–472.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hargreaves, D. (1998). Creative professionalism: The role of teachers in the knowledge society. London: Demos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hargreaves, D. (1999). The knowledge creating school. British Journal of Educational Studies, 47(2), 122–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hiebert, J., Gallimore, R., & Stigler, J. W. (1999). A knowledge base for the teaching profession: What would it look like and how can we get one? Educational Researcher, 31(5), 3–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hosseini, S. M. (2011). The application of SECI model as a framework of knowledge creation in virtual learning: Case study of IUST virtual classes. Asia Pacific Education Review, 12(2), 263–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huberman, M. (1995). Networks that alter teaching: Conceptualization, exchanges and experiments. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 1(2), 193–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lieberman, A., & Mace, D. P. (2010). Making practice public: Teacher learning in the 21 Century. Journal of Teacher Education, 61(1–2), 77–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loxley, A., Johnston, K., Murchan, D., Fitzgerald, H., & Quinn, M. (2007). The role of whole-school contexts in shaping the experiences and outcomes associated with professional development. Journal of In-service Education, 33(3), 265–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • March, J. G. (1996). Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. In M. D. Cohen & L. S. Sproull (Eds.), Organizational learning (pp. 101–123). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meirink, J. A., Meijer, P. C., & Verloop, N. (2007). A closer look at teachers’ individual learning in collaborative settings. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 13(2), 145–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meirink, J. A., Meijer, P. C., Verloop, N., & Bergen, T. C. M. (2009). How do teachers learn in the workplace? An examination of teacher learning activities. European Journal f Teacher Education, 32(3), 209–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noffke, S. E. (2009). Revisiting the professional, personal, and political dimensions of action research. In S. E. Noffke & S. Bridget (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of educational action research (pp. 6–23). London: SAGE.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The knowledge creating company: How Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka, I., Toyama, R., & Byosiere, P. (2001). A theory of organizational knowledge creation: Understanding the dynamic process of creating knowledge. In M. Dierkes, A. B. Antal, J. Child, & I. Nonaka (Eds.), Handbook of organizational learning and knowledge (pp. 492–517). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka, I. R., & von Krogh, G. (2009). Tacit knowledge and knowledge conversion: Controversy and advancement in organizational knowledge creation theory. Organization Science, 20(3), 635–652.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Opfer, V. D., & Pedder, D. (2011). Conceptualizing teacher professional learning. Review of Educational Research, 81(3), 376–407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paavola, S., Lipponen, L., & Hakkarainen, K. (2004). Models of innovative knowledge communities and three metaphors of learning. Review of Educational Research, 74(4), 557–576.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paine, L. W. (1990). The teacher as virtuoso: A Chinese model for teaching. Teachers College Record, 92(1), 49–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paine, L. W., & Ma, L. P. (1992). Teachers working together: A dialogue on organizational and cultural perspectives of Chinese teachers. International Journal of Educational Research, 19(8), 675–697.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Polanyi, M. (1966). The tacit dimension. Gloucester: Peter Smith.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poon, A. Y. K. (2008). How action research can complement formal language teacher education. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 17(1), 43–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reis-Jorge, J. (2007). Teachers’ conceptions of teacher-research and self-perceptions as enquiring practitioners: A longitudinal case study. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23(4), 402–417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sargent, T. C., & Hannum, E. (2010). Doing more with less: Teacher professional learning communities in resource-constrained primary schools in rural China. Journal of Teacher Education, 60(3), 258–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shen, J. P., Zhen, J. Z., & Poppink, S. (2007). Open lessons: A practice to develop a learning community for teachers. Educational Horizons, 85(3), 181–191.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. London: SAGE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, J., & Paine, L. W. (2001). Mentoring as assisted performance: A pair of Chinese teachers working together. The Elementary School Journal, 102(2), 157–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jocelyn L. N. Wong.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wong, J.L.N. How Do Teachers Learn Through Engaging in School-Based Teacher Learning Activities? Applying a Knowledge Conversion Perspective. Asia-Pacific Edu Res 24, 45–55 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-013-0157-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-013-0157-y

Keywords

Navigation