Advertisement

The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher

, Volume 23, Issue 1, pp 159–163 | Cite as

Bringing Innovation to EFL Writing: The Case of a Primary School in Hong Kong

  • Icy LeeEmail author
  • Kevin Wong
Brief Report

Abstract

In second language writing, not much attention has been given to the English as a foreign language (EFL) primary context. This short research report describes the implementation of a writing curriculum project in a primary school in Hong Kong, where a team of EFL teachers attempted to overhaul the traditional product approach and implemented process-genre pedagogy collaboratively. The change initiative has brought improvement to students’ motivation in learning writing, enhanced their writing performance, and brought honor to the teachers and their school as they were awarded a prestigious teaching excellence award by the Hong Kong government. This report presents the outcomes of the project and discusses the factors that facilitated change, providing useful tips to help all other teachers working in similar contexts bring improvement to the learning and teaching of writing.

Keywords

L2 writing EFL context Primary education Curriculum innovation 

References

  1. Early, J. S., & DeCosta-Smith, M. (2011). Making a case for college: A genre-based college admission essay intervention for undeserved high school students. Journal of Writing Research, 2(3), 299–329.Google Scholar
  2. Fullan, M. (1994). Coordinating the top-down and bottom-up strategies for educational reform. The Governance of Curriculum. Alexandria, VI: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development. Retrieved from http://www2.ed.gov/pubs/EdReformStudies/SysReforms/fullan1.html.
  3. Lam, R. (2013). Formative use of summative tests: Using test preparation to promote performance and self-regulation. The Asia-Pacific Educational Researcher, 22(1), 69–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Leung, A. (2008). Teacher concerns about curriculum reform: The case of project learning. The Asia-Pacific Educational Researcher, 17(1), 75–97.Google Scholar
  5. Lo, J., & Hyland, F. (2007). Enhancing students’ engagement and motivation in writing: The case of primary students in Hong Kong. Journal of Second Language Writing, 16, 219–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Sparks, D. (2002). Designing powerful professional development for teachers and principals. Oxford, OH: National Staff Development Council.Google Scholar
  7. Tong, S. Y. A. (2010). Lessons learned? School leadership and curriculum reform in Hong Kong. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 30(2), 231–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Tsui, A. B. M., & Ng, M. M. Y. (2010). Cultural contexts and situated possibilities in the teaching of second language writing. Journal of Teacher Education, 61(4), 364–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Wenger, E. (Ed.). (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Zamel, V. (1983). The composing processes of advanced ESL students: Six case studies. TESOL Quarterly, 17(2), 165–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© De La Salle University 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of EducationThe Chinese University of Hong KongShatinHong Kong
  2. 2.Pui Kiu Primary SchoolChai WanHong Kong

Personalised recommendations