Abstract
Singapore has implemented two Masterplans for Information Communication Technology (ICT) in education over the last decade. This article examines Singapore teachers’ perspectives of how leadership for ICT implementation in schools is distributed among leaders, by means of a survey conducted in 2007. The study found that transformational and instructional leadership are perceived to be distributed among multiple leaders including Principal, Heads of Technology, and Heads of Subject. Heads of Technology are viewed as performing both transformational and instructional leadership activities more frequently than the Principal or the Subject Heads. The transformational leadership and instructional leadership performed have a significant effect on the amount of extra effort teachers put into their use of ICT.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anderson, R. E., & Dexter, S. (2005). School technology leadership: An empirical investigation of prevalence and effect. Educational Administration Quarterly, 41, 49–82.
Bass, B. M., & Avolio, B. J. (1990). The implications of transactional and transformational leadership for individual, team, and organizational development. Research in Organizational Change and Development, 4, 231–272.
Bass, B. M., & Avolio, B. J. (1994). Introduction. In B. M. Bass & B. J. Avolio (Eds.), Improving organizational effectiveness through transformational leadership (pp. 1–9). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
Bennett, C. K. (1996). Schools, technology, and educational leadership: Framework for change. NASSP Bulletin, 80, 57–65.
Bridges, J. W. (2003). Principal influence: Sustaining a vision for powerful new forms of learning using technology (Doctoral dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles). Dissertation Abstracts International, 64(6), 1915.
Bush, T., Glover, D. (2003). School leadership: Concepts and evidence. www.ncsl.org.uk/literaturereviews.
Creighton, T. (2003). The principal as technology leader. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press, Inc.
Feldner, L. M. C. (2003). The role of the school administrators in supporting teachers in the integration of educational technology into K-12 classrooms. Unpublished Doctorate Dissertation, University Of North Dakota, Dakota.
Fidler, B. (1997). School leadership: Some key ideas. School Leadership & Management, 17(1), 23–37.
Flanagan, L., & Jacobsen, M. (2003). Technology leadership for the twenty-first century principal. Journal o Educational Administration, 41, 124–142.
Geijsel, F., Sleegers, P., Leithwood, K., & Jantzi, D. (2003). Transformational leadership effects on teachers’ commitment and effort toward school reform. Journal of Educational Administration, 41(3), 228–256.
Gronn, P. (2002). Distributed leadership. In K. Leithwood & P. Hallinger (Eds.), Second international handbook of educational leadership and administration (Vol. 2, pp. 653–693). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Hallinger, P. (2003). Leading educational change: Reflections on the practice of instructional and transformational leadership. Cambridge Journal of Education, 33(3), 329–351.
Hallinger, P., & Murphy, J. (1985). Assessing the instructional leadership behavior of principals. Elementary School Journal, 86(2), 217–248.
Hallinger, P., & Murphy, J. (1986). Instructional leadership in school contexts. In W. Greenfield (Ed.), Instructional leadership: Concepts, issues and controversies. Lexington, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
Harris, A. (2005). Distributed leadership. In B. Davies (Ed.), The essentials of school leadership (pp. 160–172). Thousands Oaks, CA: SAGE.
Heck, G. J., & Wallace, B. (1999). Preparing to implement learning outcomes in technology: Best practices for Alberta School jurisdictions. Alberta, Canada: Alberta Department of Education, Edmonton.
Heller, M. F., & Firestone, W. A. (1995). Who’s in charge here? Sources of leadership for change in eight schools. The Elementary School Journal, 96(1), 65–86.
Hughes, M., & Zachariah, S. (2001). An investigation into the relationship between effective administrative leadership styles and the use of technology [Electronic Version]. International Electronic Journal for Leadership in Learning (Vol. 5). Retrieved May 19, from http://www.Acs.Ucalgary.Ca/~Iejll.
Inkster, C. D. (1998). Technology leadership in elementary school principals: A comparative case study, Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Minnesota, USA.
Katzenmeyer, M., & Moller, G. (2001). Awakening the sleeping giant: Helping teachers develop as leaders (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Corwin Press.
Kincaid, T., & Feldner, L. (2002). Leadership for technology integration: The role of principals and mentors. Educational Technology & Society, 5(1), 75–80.
Kirkman, C. (2000). A model for the effective management of ICT development in schools derived from 6 contrasting case studies. Journal of Information Technology for Teacher Education, 9, 37–52.
Koh, W. L., Steers, R. M., & Terborg, J. R. (1995). The effects of transformational leadership on teacher attitudes and student performance in Singapore. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 16(4), 319–333.
Kouzes, J. M., & Posner, B. Z. (1987). The leadership challenge. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Langran, E. (2006). Technology leadership: Principals and technology coordinators working together. In C. Crawford, et al. (Eds.), Proceedings of society for information technology and teacher education international conference 2006 (pp. 2108–2113). Chesapeake, VA: AACE.
Lashway, L. (2003). Distributed leadership. Research Roundup, 19(4), 1–4.
Lawson, T., & Comber, C. (2003). School leadership and ICT: Management for change. In M. Brundrett & I. Terrell (Eds.), Learning to lead in the secondary school. London: Routledge Farmer.
Leithwood, K., & Duke, D. L. (1999). A century’s quest to understand school leadership. In J. Murphy & K. S. Louis (Eds.), Handbook of research on educational administration (2nd ed., pp. 45–72). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Leithwood, K., & Jantzi, D. (2005). Transformational leadership. In B. Davies (Ed.), The essentials of school leadership (pp. 31–43). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
Lim, C. P., et al. (2004). Effective integration of ICT in Singapore schools: Pedagogical and policy implications—final report. Singapore: National Institute of Education.
Looi, C. K., Jonassen, D. K., & Ikeda, M. (2005). Towards sustainable and scalable educational innovations informed by the learning science. Washington, DC: IOS Press.
Lucas, S. E., & Valentine, J. W. (2002). Transformational leadership: Principals, leadership teams, and school culture. Paper presented at the AERA Annual Meeting, New Orleans, LA.
Marks, H. M., & Printy, S. M. (2003). Principal leadership and school performance: An integration of transformational and instructional leadership. Educational Administration Quarterly, 39(3), 370–397.
Martinez, M. A. (2002). Principal behavior that influence teacher use of technology in Massachusetts. Providence, RI: Johnson and Wales University.
Ministry of Education Singapore. (2003). Framework paper: Building school leadership capacity. Singapore: Ministry of Education.
Ministry of Education Singapore. (2005). Executive Summary of MP2 Review Report. Singapore: Ministry of Education.
Ministry of Education Singapore. (2006). Educational Digest Statistics 2006. Retrieved December 1, 2007, from http://www.Moe.Gov.Sg/Esd/Factsheet%202006.Pdf.
Muijs, D., & Harris, A. (2003). Teacher leadership: A review of literature. Educational Management and Administration, 31(4), 437–449.
Ng, W. L. (2004). Transformational Leadership and Integration of Information and Communications Technology in Teaching: Pre-service Teachers’ Perspectives. In Proceedings of global conference on excellence in education and training, May 20–22, 2004.
Pierson, M. E. (2001). Technology integration practice as a function of pedagogical expertise. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 33, 413–443.
Sandholtz, J. H., Ringstaff, C., & Dwyer, D. C. (1997). The challenge of instructional change: Two teachers’ stories. In J. H. Sandholtz et al (Eds.), Teaching with Technology: Creating student-centered classrooms (pp 16–33). New York: Teachers College Press.
Schiller, J. (2003). Working with ICT perceptions of Australian principals. Journal of Educational Administration, 41(2), 171–185.
Sheppard, B. (1996). Exploring the transformational nature of instructional leadership. Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 42(4), 325–344.
Shuldman, M. (2004). Superintendent conceptions of institutional conditions that impact teacher technology integration. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 36(4), 319–343.
Taylor, J. E. (2004). Distributed Instructional Leadership and Teachers’ Perceptions of and Motivation for Instructional Improvement. Unpublished Doctorate Dissertation, University Of Michigan, Michigan.
Venezky, R. L. & Davis, C. (2002). Quo Vademus? The Transformation of Schooling in a Networked World. Retrieved June 17, 2007, from http://www.Oecd.Org/Dataoecd/48/20/2073054.Pdf.
Wagner, D., et al. (2005). Monitoring and evaluation of ICT in education projects: A handbook for developing countries. Washington, DC: The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development.
Weiss, C. H., & Cambone, J. (2000). Principals, shared decision making, and school reform. In Jossey-Bass (Ed.), Educational leadership (pp. 366–389). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Yee, D. L. (2000). Images of school principals’ information and communications technology leadership. Journal of Information Technology for Teacher Education, 9(3), 287–302.
Yuen, H. K., Fox, B., & Law, N. (2004). Curriculum innovations and multi-level e-leadership requirements: Putting research into practice. Asia-Pacific Cybereducation Journal, 1(1), 1–12.
Acknowledgments
This study was funded by the Learning Sciences Laboratory at the National Institute of Education, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Chen, W. School Leadership in ICT Implementation: Perspectives from Singapore. Asia-Pacific Edu Res 22, 301–311 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-012-0055-8
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-012-0055-8