Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

School Leadership in ICT Implementation: Perspectives from Singapore

  • Published:
The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher Aims and scope Submit manuscript

An Erratum to this article was published on 29 March 2013

Abstract

Singapore has implemented two Masterplans for Information Communication Technology (ICT) in education over the last decade. This article examines Singapore teachers’ perspectives of how leadership for ICT implementation in schools is distributed among leaders, by means of a survey conducted in 2007. The study found that transformational and instructional leadership are perceived to be distributed among multiple leaders including Principal, Heads of Technology, and Heads of Subject. Heads of Technology are viewed as performing both transformational and instructional leadership activities more frequently than the Principal or the Subject Heads. The transformational leadership and instructional leadership performed have a significant effect on the amount of extra effort teachers put into their use of ICT.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, R. E., & Dexter, S. (2005). School technology leadership: An empirical investigation of prevalence and effect. Educational Administration Quarterly, 41, 49–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bass, B. M., & Avolio, B. J. (1990). The implications of transactional and transformational leadership for individual, team, and organizational development. Research in Organizational Change and Development, 4, 231–272.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bass, B. M., & Avolio, B. J. (1994). Introduction. In B. M. Bass & B. J. Avolio (Eds.), Improving organizational effectiveness through transformational leadership (pp. 1–9). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, C. K. (1996). Schools, technology, and educational leadership: Framework for change. NASSP Bulletin, 80, 57–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bridges, J. W. (2003). Principal influence: Sustaining a vision for powerful new forms of learning using technology (Doctoral dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles). Dissertation Abstracts International, 64(6), 1915.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bush, T., Glover, D. (2003). School leadership: Concepts and evidence. www.ncsl.org.uk/literaturereviews.

  • Creighton, T. (2003). The principal as technology leader. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldner, L. M. C. (2003). The role of the school administrators in supporting teachers in the integration of educational technology into K-12 classrooms. Unpublished Doctorate Dissertation, University Of North Dakota, Dakota.

  • Fidler, B. (1997). School leadership: Some key ideas. School Leadership & Management, 17(1), 23–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flanagan, L., & Jacobsen, M. (2003). Technology leadership for the twenty-first century principal. Journal o Educational Administration, 41, 124–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geijsel, F., Sleegers, P., Leithwood, K., & Jantzi, D. (2003). Transformational leadership effects on teachers’ commitment and effort toward school reform. Journal of Educational Administration, 41(3), 228–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gronn, P. (2002). Distributed leadership. In K. Leithwood & P. Hallinger (Eds.), Second international handbook of educational leadership and administration (Vol. 2, pp. 653–693). Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hallinger, P. (2003). Leading educational change: Reflections on the practice of instructional and transformational leadership. Cambridge Journal of Education, 33(3), 329–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hallinger, P., & Murphy, J. (1985). Assessing the instructional leadership behavior of principals. Elementary School Journal, 86(2), 217–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hallinger, P., & Murphy, J. (1986). Instructional leadership in school contexts. In W. Greenfield (Ed.), Instructional leadership: Concepts, issues and controversies. Lexington, MA: Allyn & Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, A. (2005). Distributed leadership. In B. Davies (Ed.), The essentials of school leadership (pp. 160–172). Thousands Oaks, CA: SAGE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heck, G. J., & Wallace, B. (1999). Preparing to implement learning outcomes in technology: Best practices for Alberta School jurisdictions. Alberta, Canada: Alberta Department of Education, Edmonton.

  • Heller, M. F., & Firestone, W. A. (1995). Who’s in charge here? Sources of leadership for change in eight schools. The Elementary School Journal, 96(1), 65–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, M., & Zachariah, S. (2001). An investigation into the relationship between effective administrative leadership styles and the use of technology [Electronic Version]. International Electronic Journal for Leadership in Learning (Vol. 5). Retrieved May 19, from http://www.Acs.Ucalgary.Ca/~Iejll.

  • Inkster, C. D. (1998). Technology leadership in elementary school principals: A comparative case study, Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Minnesota, USA.

  • Katzenmeyer, M., & Moller, G. (2001). Awakening the sleeping giant: Helping teachers develop as leaders (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Corwin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kincaid, T., & Feldner, L. (2002). Leadership for technology integration: The role of principals and mentors. Educational Technology & Society, 5(1), 75–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirkman, C. (2000). A model for the effective management of ICT development in schools derived from 6 contrasting case studies. Journal of Information Technology for Teacher Education, 9, 37–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koh, W. L., Steers, R. M., & Terborg, J. R. (1995). The effects of transformational leadership on teacher attitudes and student performance in Singapore. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 16(4), 319–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kouzes, J. M., & Posner, B. Z. (1987). The leadership challenge. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langran, E. (2006). Technology leadership: Principals and technology coordinators working together. In C. Crawford, et al. (Eds.), Proceedings of society for information technology and teacher education international conference 2006 (pp. 2108–2113). Chesapeake, VA: AACE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lashway, L. (2003). Distributed leadership. Research Roundup, 19(4), 1–4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawson, T., & Comber, C. (2003). School leadership and ICT: Management for change. In M. Brundrett & I. Terrell (Eds.), Learning to lead in the secondary school. London: Routledge Farmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leithwood, K., & Duke, D. L. (1999). A century’s quest to understand school leadership. In J. Murphy & K. S. Louis (Eds.), Handbook of research on educational administration (2nd ed., pp. 45–72). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leithwood, K., & Jantzi, D. (2005). Transformational leadership. In B. Davies (Ed.), The essentials of school leadership (pp. 31–43). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lim, C. P., et al. (2004). Effective integration of ICT in Singapore schools: Pedagogical and policy implications—final report. Singapore: National Institute of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Looi, C. K., Jonassen, D. K., & Ikeda, M. (2005). Towards sustainable and scalable educational innovations informed by the learning science. Washington, DC: IOS Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lucas, S. E., & Valentine, J. W. (2002). Transformational leadership: Principals, leadership teams, and school culture. Paper presented at the AERA Annual Meeting, New Orleans, LA.

  • Marks, H. M., & Printy, S. M. (2003). Principal leadership and school performance: An integration of transformational and instructional leadership. Educational Administration Quarterly, 39(3), 370–397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martinez, M. A. (2002). Principal behavior that influence teacher use of technology in Massachusetts. Providence, RI: Johnson and Wales University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Education Singapore. (2003). Framework paper: Building school leadership capacity. Singapore: Ministry of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Education Singapore. (2005). Executive Summary of MP2 Review Report. Singapore: Ministry of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Education Singapore. (2006). Educational Digest Statistics 2006. Retrieved December 1, 2007, from http://www.Moe.Gov.Sg/Esd/Factsheet%202006.Pdf.

  • Muijs, D., & Harris, A. (2003). Teacher leadership: A review of literature. Educational Management and Administration, 31(4), 437–449.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ng, W. L. (2004). Transformational Leadership and Integration of Information and Communications Technology in Teaching: Pre-service Teachers’ Perspectives. In Proceedings of global conference on excellence in education and training, May 20–22, 2004.

  • Pierson, M. E. (2001). Technology integration practice as a function of pedagogical expertise. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 33, 413–443.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandholtz, J. H., Ringstaff, C., & Dwyer, D. C. (1997). The challenge of instructional change: Two teachers’ stories. In J. H. Sandholtz et al (Eds.), Teaching with Technology: Creating student-centered classrooms (pp 16–33). New York: Teachers College Press.

  • Schiller, J. (2003). Working with ICT perceptions of Australian principals. Journal of Educational Administration, 41(2), 171–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheppard, B. (1996). Exploring the transformational nature of instructional leadership. Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 42(4), 325–344.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shuldman, M. (2004). Superintendent conceptions of institutional conditions that impact teacher technology integration. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 36(4), 319–343.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, J. E. (2004). Distributed Instructional Leadership and Teachers’ Perceptions of and Motivation for Instructional Improvement. Unpublished Doctorate Dissertation, University Of Michigan, Michigan.

  • Venezky, R. L. & Davis, C. (2002). Quo Vademus? The Transformation of Schooling in a Networked World. Retrieved June 17, 2007, from http://www.Oecd.Org/Dataoecd/48/20/2073054.Pdf.

  • Wagner, D., et al. (2005). Monitoring and evaluation of ICT in education projects: A handbook for developing countries. Washington, DC: The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, C. H., & Cambone, J. (2000). Principals, shared decision making, and school reform. In Jossey-Bass (Ed.), Educational leadership (pp. 366–389). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yee, D. L. (2000). Images of school principals’ information and communications technology leadership. Journal of Information Technology for Teacher Education, 9(3), 287–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yuen, H. K., Fox, B., & Law, N. (2004). Curriculum innovations and multi-level e-leadership requirements: Putting research into practice. Asia-Pacific Cybereducation Journal, 1(1), 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was funded by the Learning Sciences Laboratory at the National Institute of Education, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wenli Chen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chen, W. School Leadership in ICT Implementation: Perspectives from Singapore. Asia-Pacific Edu Res 22, 301–311 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-012-0055-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-012-0055-8

Keywords

Navigation