Skip to main content
Log in

Safety and Efficacy of Anti-Hypertensive Medications in Patients with Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

  • Review article
  • Published:
High Blood Pressure & Cardiovascular Prevention Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

Hypertension (HTN) is a co-morbidity that is commonly associated with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). However, it remains unclear whether treatment of hypertension in HFpEF patients is associated with improved cardiovascular outcomes.

Aim

The purpose of this meta-analysis is to evaluate the association of anti-hypertensive medical therapy with cardiovascular outcomes in patients with HFpEF.

Methods

We performed a database search for studies reporting on the association of anti-hypertensive medications with cardiovascular outcomes and safety endpoints in patients with HFpEF. The databases searched include OVID Medline, Web of Science, and Embase. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality. Secondary endpoints include cardiovascular (CV) mortality, worsening heart failure (HF), CV hospitalization, composite major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), hyperkalemia, worsening renal function, and hypotension.

Results

A total of 12 studies with 14062 HFpEF participants (7010 treated with medical therapy versus 7052 treated with placebo) met inclusion criteria. Use of anti-hypertensive medications was not associated with lower all-cause mortality, CV mortality or CV hospitalization compared to treatment with placebo (OR 1.02, 95% CI 0.77–1.35; p = 0.9, OR 0.88, 95% CI 0.73–1.06; p = 0.19, OR 0.99, 95% CI 0.87–1.12; p = 0.83, OR 0.90, 95% CI 0.79–1.03; p = 0.11). Anti-hypertensive medications were not associated with lower risk of subsequent acute myocardial infarction (AMI) (OR 0.53, 95% CI 0.07–3.73; p = 0.5). Use of anti-hypertensive medications was associated with a statistically significant lower risk of MACE (OR 0.90, 95% CI 0.83–0.98; p = 0.02).

Conclusions

While treatment with anti-hypertensive medications was not associated with lower risk of all-cause mortality, their use may be associated with reduce risk of adverse cardiovascular outcomes in patients with HFpEF regardless of whether they have HTN. Additional high quality studies are required to clarify this association and determine the effect based on specific classes of medications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ashley EA, Niebauer J. Cardiology explained. Remedica Copyright © 2004, Remedica.: London; 2004.

  2. Tackling G, Borhade MB. Hypertensive Heart Disease, in StatPearls. StatPearls Publishing Copyright © 2023, StatPearls Publishing LLC.: Treasure Island (FL); 2023. Ineligible companies. Disclosure: Mahesh Borhade declares no relevant financial relationships with ineligible companies.

  3. Gazewood JD, Turner PL. Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: diagnosis and management. Am Fam Physician. 2017;96(9):582–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Chobanian AV, et al. The seventh report of the joint national committee on prevention, detection, evaluation, and treatment of high blood pressure: the JNC 7 report. JAMA. 2003;289(19):2560–71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Levy D, et al. The progression from hypertension to congestive heart failure. JAMA. 1996;275(20):1557–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Vasan RS, et al. Impact of high-normal blood pressure on the risk of cardiovascular disease. N Engl J Med. 2001;345(18):1291–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Wright JT Jr, Williamson JD, Whelton PK, Snyder JK, Sink KM, Rocco MV, Reboussin DM, Rahman M, Oparil S, Lewis CE, Kimmel PL, Johnson KC, Goff DC Jr, Fine LJ, Cutler JA, Cushman WC, Cheung AK, Ambrosius WT. A randomized trial of intensive versus standard blood-pressure control. N Engl J Med. 2015;373(22):2103–16.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Heidenreich PA, et al. 2022 AHA/ACC/HFSA guideline for the management of heart failure: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on clinical practice guidelines. Circulation. 2022;145(18):e895–1032.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Verdecchia P, et al. Left ventricular mass and cardiovascular morbidity in essential hypertension: the MAVI study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001;38(7):1829–35.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Levy D, et al. Prognostic implications of baseline electrocardiographic features and their serial changes in subjects with left ventricular hypertrophy. Circulation. 1994;90(4):1786–93.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Devereux RB, et al. Regression of hypertensive left ventricular hypertrophy by losartan compared with atenolol: the Losartan Intervention for Endpoint Reduction in Hypertension (LIFE) trial. Circulation. 2004;110(11):1456–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Dahlöf B, Pennert K, Hansson L. Reversal of left ventricular hypertrophy in hypertensive patients: a metaanalysis of 109 treatment studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1992.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  13. Klingbeil AU, et al. A meta-analysis of the effects of treatment on left ventricular mass in essential hypertension. Am J Med. 2003;115(1):41–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Ruilope LM, Schmieder RE. Left ventricular hypertrophy and clinical outcomes in hypertensive patients. Am J Hypertens. 2008;21(5):500–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Massie BM, et al. Irbesartan in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction. N Engl J Med. 2008;359(23):2456–67.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Yusuf S, et al. Effects of candesartan in patients with chronic heart failure and preserved left-ventricular ejection fraction: the CHARM-Preserved Trial. Lancet. 2003;362(9386):777–81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Hernandez AF, et al. Clinical effectiveness of beta-blockers in heart failure: findings from the OPTIMIZE-HF (Organized Program to Initiate Lifesaving Treatment in Hospitalized Patients with Heart Failure) Registry. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009;53(2):184–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Pitt B, et al. Spironolactone for heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. N Engl J Med. 2014;370(15):1383–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Solomon SD, et al. Angiotensin–neprilysin inhibition in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. N Engl J Med. 2019;381(17):1609–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Lund LH, et al. Heart failure with mid-range ejection fraction in CHARM: characteristics, outcomes and effect of candesartan across the entire ejection fraction spectrum. Eur J Heart Fail. 2018;20(8):1230–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Butler J, Anker SD, Packer M. Redefining heart failure with a reduced ejection fraction. JAMA. 2019;322(18):1761–2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Pascual-Figal DA, et al. Mid-range left ventricular ejection fraction: clinical profile and cause of death in ambulatory patients with chronic heart failure. Int J Cardiol. 2017;240:265–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Paulus WJ, Tschöpe C. A novel paradigm for heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: comorbidities drive myocardial dysfunction and remodeling through coronary microvascular endothelial inflammation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;62(4):263–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. van Heerebeek L, et al. Low myocardial protein kinase G activity in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. Circulation. 2012;126(7):830–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Anker SD, et al. Empagliflozin in heart failure with a preserved ejection fraction. N Engl J Med. 2021;385(16):1451–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Pandey AK, et al. Mechanisms of benefits of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. Eur Heart J. 2023;44(37):3640–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mohammed Al-Sadawi.

Ethics declarations

Funding

None.

Conflict of interest

The authors report no relevant conflicts of interest.

Compliance with ethical standards (guidelines statement)

The systematic review was conducted with a protocol in accordance with the Preferred Reporting of Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement.

Ethical approval

The study is a systematic review and meta-analysis; no ethical approval was required.

Data availability

Not applicable.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Al-Sadawi, M., Tao, M., Dhaliwal, S. et al. Safety and Efficacy of Anti-Hypertensive Medications in Patients with Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. High Blood Press Cardiovasc Prev (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40292-024-00646-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40292-024-00646-0

Keywords

Navigation