Skip to main content
Log in

Circadian Variations in Sympathetic Vasoconstriction in Older Adults with and Without Type 2 Diabetes

  • Original Article
  • Published:
High Blood Pressure & Cardiovascular Prevention Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

An impact of the sympathetic nervous system in the higher rate of cardiovascular events in the early morning compared to the evening has been claimed. Augmented sympathetic vasoconstriction increases cardiovascular risk by augmenting pulse pressure and cardiac afterload. Type 2 diabetes (T2DM) further increases sympathetic neurovascular transduction and cardiovascular risk.

Aim

We assessed whether peripheral vasoconstriction triggered by a standardized sympathetic stressor is augmented at 6am vs 9pm in adults between 50–80 years with type 2 diabetes (T2DM50-80) vs healthy ones (H50-80).

Methods

Mean values of sympathetic vasoconstrictor responsiveness (SVR), vascular conductance (VC), brachial artery blood flow, and mean arterial pressure were measured on the contralateral forearm over two 5-minute bouts of rest and handgrip-mediated sympathetic stimulation, respectively.

Results

Although baseline VC values were lower (p < 0.01) in the morning vs evening in both groups, SVR values in response to sympathoexcitation were similar in H50-80 (− 0.43 ± 12.44 vs − 2.57 ± 11.63 %, p = 0.73) and T2DM50-80 (+6.64 ± 10.67 vs +5.21 ± 7.64 %, p = 0.90), but higher (< 0.01) in T2DM50-80 vs H50-80 at both day hours. Individuals with T2DM reported positive SVR values and VC change-scores, while healthy individuals reported statistically different (< 0.02) negative SVR values and VC change-scores.

Conclusion

Peripheral vasoconstriction triggered by a standardized sympathetic stressor is similar between morning and evening, regardless of T2DM and different baseline VC values. However, peripheral vasoconstriction responsiveness is blunted in individuals with T2DM as handgrip-mediated sympathoexcitation induces vasodilation in the contralateral forearm in adults with T2DM and vasoconstriction in healthy age-matched controls, highlighting a neurovascular response altered by T2DM.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Reference

  1. Elliott WJ. Cyclic and circadian variations in cardiovascular events. Am J Hypertens. 2001;14:291S-295S. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0895-7061(01)02174-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Atkinson G, Jones H, Ainslie PN. Circadian variation in the circulatory responses to exercise: Relevance to the morning peaks in strokes and cardiac events. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2010;108:15–29. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-009-1243-y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Gentilin A, Moghetti P, Cevese A, Mattioli AV, Schena F, Tarperi C. Circadian and sex differences in carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity in young individuals and elderly with and without type 2 diabetes. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022;9:952621. https://doi.org/10.3389/FCVM.2022.952621.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Muller JE, Tofler GH, Verrier RL. Sympathetic activity as the cause of the morning increase in cardiac events. A likely culprit, but the evidence remains circumstantial. Circulation. 1995;91:2508–9. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.91.10.2508.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Del Pinto R, Grassi G, Ferri C, Pengo MF, Lombardi C, Pucci G, et al. Diagnostic and therapeutic approach to sleep disorders, high blood pressure and cardiovascular diseases: a consensus document by the Italian Society of Hypertension (SIIA). High Blood Press Cardiovasc Prev. 2021;28:85–102. https://doi.org/10.1007/S40292-021-00436-Y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Panza JA, Epstein SE, Quyyumi AA. Circadian variation in vascular tone and its relation to alpha-sympathetic vasoconstrictor activity. N Engl J Med. 1991;325:986–90. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199110033251402.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Otto ME, Svatikova A, De Mattos Barretto RB, Santos S, Hoffmann M, Khandheria B, et al. Early morning attenuation of endothelial function in healthy humans. Circulation. 2004;109:2507–10. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.0000128207.26863.C4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Somers VK, Dyken ME, Mark AL, Abboud FM. Sympathetic-nerve activity during sleep in normal subjects. N Engl J Med. 1993;328:303–7. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199302043280502.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Dyson KS, Shoemaker JK, Hughson RL. Effect of acute sympathetic nervous system activation on flow-mediated dilation of brachial artery. Am J Physiol - Hear Circ Physiol. 2006;290:H1446–53. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpheart.00771.2005.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Gentilin A, Moghetti P, Cevese A, Schena F, Tarperi C. Sympathetic-mediated blunting of forearm vasodilation is similar between young men and women. Biol Sex Differ. 2022;13:33. https://doi.org/10.1186/S13293-022-00444-0.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Kollias GE, Stamatelopoulos KS, Papaioannou TG, Zakopoulos NA, Alevizaki M, Alexopoulos GP, et al. Diurnal variation of endothelial function and arterial stiffness in hypertension. J Hum Hypertens. 2009;23:597–604. https://doi.org/10.1038/JHH.2009.2.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Gentilin A, Tarperi C, Skroce K, Cevese A, Schena F. Effect of acute sympathetic activation on leg vasodilation before and after endurance exercise. J Smooth Muscle Res. 2021;57:53–67. https://doi.org/10.1540/JSMR.57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Chen L, Yang G. Recent advances in circadian rhythms in cardiovascular system. Front Pharmacol. 2015;6:71. https://doi.org/10.3389/FPHAR.2015.00071.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Wu H, Norton V, Cui K, Zhu B, Bhattacharjee S, Lu YW, et al. Diabetes and Its Cardiovascular Complications: Comprehensive Network and Systematic Analyses. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022;9:841928. https://doi.org/10.3389/FCVM.2022.841928.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Schiavoni M, Cosentino F, Camici GG, Luescher TF. Diabetes and endothelial dysfunction: What’s the culprit? High Blood Press Cardiovasc Prev. 2007;14:5–10. https://doi.org/10.2165/00151642-200714010-00002/FIGURES/3.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Wang Y, Jiang W, Chen H, Zhou H, Liu Z, Liu Z, et al. Sympathetic nervous system mediates cardiac remodeling after myocardial infarction in a circadian disruption model. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2021;8:668387. https://doi.org/10.3389/FCVM.2021.668387.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Emdin M. Autonomic nervous system in diabetes. Ital Hear J Suppl. 2001;2:857–62.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Young BE, Holwerda SW, Vranish JR, Keller DM, Fadel PJ. Sympathetic Transduction in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. Hypertens (Dallas, Tex 1979). 2019;74:201–7. https://doi.org/10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.119.12928.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Buckwalter JB, Clifford PS. The paradox of sympathetic vasoconstriction in exercising skeletal muscle. Exerc Sport Sci Rev. 2001;29:159–63. https://doi.org/10.1097/00003677-200110000-00005.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Thomas GD, Segal SS. Neural control of muscle blood flow during exercise. J Appl Physiol. 2004;97:731–8. https://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.00076.2004.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Cosentino F, Grant PJ, Aboyans V, Bailey CJ, Ceriello A, Delgado V, et al. 2019 ESC Guidelines on diabetes, pre-diabetes, and cardiovascular diseases developed in collaboration with the EASD. Eur Heart J. 2020;41:255–323. https://doi.org/10.1093/EURHEARTJ/EHZ486.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Cheshire WP, Freeman R, Gibbons CH, Cortelli P, Wenning GK, Hilz MJ, et al. Electrodiagnostic assessment of the autonomic nervous system: A consensus statement endorsed by the American Autonomic Society, American Academy of Neurology, and the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. Clin Neurophysiol. 2021;132:666–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CLINPH.2020.11.024.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Michikami D, Kamiya A, Fu Q, Niimi Y, Iwase S, Mano T, et al. Forearm elevation augments sympathetic activation during handgrip exercise in humans. Clin Sci. 2002;103:295–301. https://doi.org/10.1042/cs1030295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Saito M, Mano T, Abe H, Iwase S. Responses in muscle sympathetic nerve activity to sustained hand-grips of different tensions in humans. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1986;55:493–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00421643.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Saito M, Mano T, Iwase S. Changes in muscle sympathetic nerve activity and calf blood flow during static handgrip exercise. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1990;60:277–81. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00379396.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Kaijser L. Neurogenic forearm vasodilatation during contralateral isometric exercise is attenuated in diabetes mellitus. Clin Auton Res. 1991;1:239–42. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01824993.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Jacobsen TN, Hansen J, Nielsen HV, Wildschiødtz G, Kassis E, Larsen B, et al. Skeletal muscle vascular responses in human limbs to isometric handgrip. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1994;69:147–53. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00609407.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alessandro Gentilin.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

None declared. 

Ethical Statement

The study was approved by the Ethics Board of the University of Verona (3293CESC) and conducted following the declaration of Helsinki. Informed oral and written consent was obtained from all participants before starting any test.

Funding

None declared.

Data Availability

The data are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Authors’ contributions

Study concept and design (AG); subject recruitment, data acquisition and analysis (AG); formal analysis and investigation (AG); data interpretation (AG, AC, PM, AVM, FS, CT); original draft preparation (AG); review and critical revision of the manuscript (AG, AC, PM, AVM, FS, CT); all authors read and approved the final version of this manuscript.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 15 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gentilin, A., Moghetti, P., Cevese, A. et al. Circadian Variations in Sympathetic Vasoconstriction in Older Adults with and Without Type 2 Diabetes. High Blood Press Cardiovasc Prev 30, 55–62 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40292-022-00557-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40292-022-00557-y

Keywords

Navigation