Skip to main content

Muscle Fibre Typology as a Novel Risk Factor for Hamstring Strain Injuries in Professional Football (Soccer): A Prospective Cohort Study

Sports Medicine volume 52, pages 177–185 (2022)Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Hamstring strain injuries (HSI) are prevalent in team sports and occur frequently in the later phase of matches. In the search for interindividual factors that determine muscle fatigue and possibly injury risk, muscle fibre typology is a likely candidate.

Objective

The aim of the study was to determine whether muscle fibre typology is a risk factor for HSI.

Methods

A prospective cohort study was conducted over three seasons in professional football players competing in the Belgian Jupiler Pro League (n = 118) and in the English Premier League (n = 47). A total of 27 HSI were sustained during this period. Muscle fibre typology was non-invasively estimated using proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy and was characterized as a fast, slow, or intermediate typology based on the carnosine concentration in the soleus. A multivariate Cox model was used to identify risk factors for HSI.

Results

Football players exhibited a wide variety of muscle typologies (slow 44.9%, intermediate 39.8%, fast 15.3%). In the combined cohort, players with a fast typology displayed a 5.3-fold (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.92–14.8; P = 0.001) higher risk of sustaining an index HSI than slow typology players. This was also independently observed in both leagues separately as, respectively, a 6.7-fold (95% CI 1.3–34.1; P = 0.023) and a 5.1-fold (95% CI 1.2–20.4; P = 0.023) higher chance was found in fast typology players than in slow typology players of the Jupiler Pro League and the Premier League cohort.

Conclusion

We identified muscle fibre typology as a novel and potent risk factor for HSI in team sports.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

USD 49.95

Price includes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

References

  1. Ekstrand J, Hägglund M, Waldén M. Epidemiology of muscle injuries in professional football (soccer). Am J Sports Med. 2011;39:1226–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Petersen J, Hölmich P. Evidence based prevention of hamstring injuries in sport. Br J Sports Med. 2005;39:319–23.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ekstrand J, Waldén M, Hägglund M. Hamstring injuries have increased by 4% annually in men’s professional football, since 2001: a 13-year longitudinal analysis of the UEFA Elite Club injury study. Br J Sports Med. 2016;50:731–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Freckleton G, Pizzari T. Risk factors for hamstring muscle strain injury in sport: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Sports Med. 2013;47:351–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Timmins RG, Bourne MN, Shield AJ, Williams MD, Lorenzen C, Opar DA. Short biceps femoris fascicles and eccentric knee flexor weakness increase the risk of hamstring injury in elite football (soccer): a prospective cohort study. Br J Sports Med. 2016;50:1524–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Barnes C, Archer DT, Hogg B, Bush M, Bradley PS. The evolution of physical and technical performance parameters in the english premier league. Int J Sports Med. 2014;35:1095–100.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Woods C, Hawkins RD, Maltby S, Hulse M, Thomas A, Hodson A. The football association medical research programme: an audit of injuries in professional football—analysis of hamstring injuries. Br J Sports Med. 2004;38:36–41.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Huygaerts S, Cos F, Cohen DD, Calleja-González J, Guitart M, Blazevich AJ, et al. Mechanisms of hamstring strain injury: interactions between fatigue. Muscle Act Funct Sports. 2020;8:65.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Schuermans J, Van Tiggelen D, Danneels L, Witvrouw E. Biceps femoris and semitendinosus—teammates or competitors? New insights into hamstring injury mechanisms in male football players: a muscle functional MRI study. Br J Sports Med. 2014;48:1599–606.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Small K, McNaughton L, Greig M, Lovell R. The effects of multidirectional soccer-specific fatigue on markers of hamstring injury risk. J Sci Med Sport. 2010;13:120–5.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Allen TJ, Leung M, Proske U. The effect of fatigue from exercise on human limb position sense. J Physiol. 2010;588:1369–77.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Morgan DL. New insights into the behavior of muscle during active lengthening. Biophys J Cell Press. 1990;57:209–21.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Lehnert M, De Ste CM, Zaatar A, Hughes J, Varekova R, Lastovicka O. Muscular and neuromuscular control following soccer-specific exercise in male youth: Changes in injury risk mechanisms. Scand J Med Sci Sport. 2017;27:975–82.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Greig M. The influence of soccer-specific fatigue on peak isokinetic torque production of the knee flexors and extensors. Am J Sports Med. 2008;36:1403–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Timmins RG, Opar DA, Williams MD, Schache AG, Dear NM, Shield AJ. Reduced biceps femoris myoelectrical activity influences eccentric knee flexor weakness after repeat sprint running. Scand J Med Sci Sport. 2014;24:299–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Greco CC, Da Silva WL, Camarda SRA, Denadai BS. Fatigue and rapid hamstring/quadriceps force capacity in professional soccer players. Clin Physiol Funct Imaging. 2013;33:18–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Thorstensson A, Karlsson J. Fatiguability and fibre composition of human skeletal muscle. Acta Physiol Scand. 1976;98:318–22.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Baguet A, Everaert I, Hespel P, Petrovic M, Achten E, Derave W. A new method for non-invasive estimation of human muscle fiber type composition. PLoS ONE. 2011;6:e21956.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Ozdemir MS, Reyngoudt H, De Deene Y, Sazak HS, Fieremans E, Delputte S, et al. Absolute quantification of carnosine in human calf muscle by proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Phys Med Biol. 2007;52:6781–94.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Baguet A, Reyngoudt H, Pottier A, Everaert I, Callens S, Achten E, et al. Carnosine loading and washout in human skeletal muscles. J Appl Physiol. 2009;106:837–42.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Vikne H, Gundersen K, Liestøl K, Maelen J, Vøllestad N. Intermuscular relationship of human muscle fiber type proportions: Slow leg muscles predict slow neck muscles. Muscle Nerve. 2012;45:527–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Johnson MA, Polgar J, Weightman D, Appleton D. Data on the distribution of fibre types in thirty-six human muscles. An autopsy study. J Neurol Sci. 1973;18:111–29.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Baguet A, Bourgois J, Vanhee L, Achten E, Derave W. Important role of muscle carnosine in rowing performance. J Appl Physiol. 2010;109:1096–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. MacMillan EL, Bolliger CS, Boesch C, Kreis R. Influence of muscle fiber orientation on water and metabolite relaxation times, magnetization transfer, and visibility in human skeletal muscle. Magn Reson Med. 2016;75:1764–70.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Just Kukurová I, Valkovič L, Ukropec J, de Courten B, Chmelík M, Ukropcová B, et al. Improved spectral resolution and high reliability of in vivo 1H MRS at 7 T allow the characterization of the effect of acute exercise on carnosine in skeletal muscle. NMR Biomed. 2016;29:24–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Lievens E, Van Vossel K, Van de Casteele F, Krssak M, Murdoch JB, Befroy DE, et al. Cores of Reproducibility in Physiology (CORP): quantification of human skeletal muscle carnosine concentration by proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy. J Appl Physiol. 2021. (Epub ahead)

  27. Hägglund M, Waldén M. Previous injury as a risk factor for injury in elite football: a prospective study over two consecutive seasons. Br J Sport Med. 2006;40:767–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Simoneau JA, Bouchard C. Genetic determinism of fiber type proportion in human skeletal muscle. FASEB J. 1995;9:1091–5.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Baguet A, Everaert I, Achten E, Thomis M, Derave W. The influence of sex, age and heritability on human skeletal muscle carnosine content. Amino Acids. 2012;43:13–20.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Qaisar R, Bhaskaran S, Van Remmen H. Muscle fiber type diversification during exercise and regeneration. Free Radic Biol Med. 2016;98:56–67.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Willingham TB, Kim Y, Lindberg E, Bleck CKE, Glancy B. The unified myofibrillar matrix for force generation in muscle. Nat Commun. 2020;11:1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Lievens E, Klass M, Bex T, Derave W. Muscle fiber typology substantially influences time to recover from high-intensity exercise. J Appl Physiol. 2020;128:648–59.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Chumanov ES, Schache AG, Heiderscheit BC, Thelen DG. Hamstrings are most susceptible to injury during the late swing phase of sprinting. Br J Sports Med. 2012;46:90–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Kenneally-Dabrowski CJB, Brown NAT, Lai AKM, Perriman D, Spratford W, Serpell BG. Late swing or early stance? A narrative review of hamstring injury mechanisms during high-speed running. Scand J Med Sci Sport. 2019;29:1083–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Greenland S, Mansournia MA, Altman DG. Sparse data bias: a problem hiding in plain sight. BMJ. 2016;353.

  36. Walsh M, Srinathan SK, McAuley DF, Mrkobrada M, Levine O, Ribic C, et al. The statistical significance of randomized controlled trial results is frequently fragile: a case for a Fragility Index. J Clin Epidemiol. 2014;67:622–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Movement and Sports Sciences, Ghent University, Watersportlaan 2, 9000, Ghent, Belgium

    E. Lievens, K. Van Vossel, F. Van de Casteele, S. Matthys, J. G. Bourgois & Wim Derave

  2. Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium

    E. Wezenbeek & E. Witvrouw

  3. Club Brugge KV, Brugge, Belgium

    D. Deprez

  4. Koninklijke Atletiek Associatie Gent, Ghent, Belgium

    S. Matthys & J. G. Bourgois

  5. Zulte Waregem, Waregem, Belgium

    B. De Winne

  6. Manchester United FC, Manchester, UK

    S. McNally

  7. Canon Medical Systems Europe B.V., Zoetermeer, The Netherlands

    W. De Graaf

  8. Canon Medical Research, Cleveland, OH, USA

    J. B. Murdoch

Authors
  1. E. Lievens
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. K. Van Vossel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. F. Van de Casteele
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. E. Wezenbeek
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. D. Deprez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. S. Matthys
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. B. De Winne
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. S. McNally
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. W. De Graaf
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. J. B. Murdoch
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. J. G. Bourgois
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. E. Witvrouw
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Wim Derave
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wim Derave.

Ethics declarations

Funding

EL received a grant from Research Foundation-Flanders (FWO 1104020 N) during the conduct of the study. The funder of the study had no role in study design, data collection, data analysis, data interpretation, or writing of the report.

Conflict of interest

EL received a grant from Research Foundation-Flanders (FWO 1104020 N) during the conduct of the study. KVV, FVdC, EW, DD, BDW, SM, WDG, JBM, JGB, EW, and WD have no conflicts of interest that are directly relevant to the content of this article.

Ethics approval

This study was performed in line with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. Approval was granted by the local ethical committee (Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium; B670201837890).

Consent to participate

All subjects gave their written informed consent to take part in the study.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Availability of data and material

The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Code availability

Not applicable.

Author contributions

EL, WD, and EW participated in the design of the study and drafted the manuscript. KVV, FVdC, and EW contributed to the statistical analysis. DD, SM, BDW, SM, WDG, JBM, and JGB participated in data collection. All authors contributed to data interpretation and reviewed the final version.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lievens, E., Van Vossel, K., Van de Casteele, F. et al. Muscle Fibre Typology as a Novel Risk Factor for Hamstring Strain Injuries in Professional Football (Soccer): A Prospective Cohort Study. Sports Med 52, 177–185 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-021-01538-2

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-021-01538-2