Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Reply to Senefeld et al: Comment on “Sex Dimorphism of VO2max Trainability: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis”

  • Letter
  • Published:
Sports Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

The Original Article was published on 07 September 2019

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Senefeld J, Smith JR, Wiggins CC, Joyner M. Comment on: “Sex dimorphism of VȮ2max trainability: a systematic review and meta-analysis”. Sports Med. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-019-01180-z.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Higgins JPT, Green S (editors). Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration; 2011. http://www.cochrane-handbook.org. Accessed 20 Jan 2020.

  3. Diaz-Canestro C, Montero D. Sex dimorphism of VO2max trainability: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sports Med. 2019;49(12):1949–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Kinesiology, University of Calgary, 2500 University Drive NW, Calgary, AB, Canada

    Candela Diaz-Canestro & David Montero

  2. Libin Cardiovascular Institute of Alberta, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada

    Candela Diaz-Canestro & David Montero

  3. Cumming School of Medicine, Department of Cardiac Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada

    David Montero

Authors
  1. Candela Diaz-Canestro
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. David Montero
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David Montero.

Ethics declarations

Funding

No sources of funding were used to assist in the preparation of this letter.

Conflict of interest

Candela Diaz-Canestro and David Montero declare that they have no conflicts of interest relevant to the content of this letter.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Diaz-Canestro, C., Montero, D. Reply to Senefeld et al: Comment on “Sex Dimorphism of VO2max Trainability: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis”. Sports Med 50, 1049–1050 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-020-01271-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-020-01271-2

Search

Navigation