Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
1 Correction to: Sports Medicine https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-019-01178-7
Page 5, column 1, section 3.2, paragraph 1, sentence 1: The following sentence, which previously read:
“Consistency between the studies assessed for both hamstring strength measures and muscle architecture was moderate to high, with I2 values of 62.49% and 88.03%, respectively.”
Should read:
“Consistency between the studies assessed for both hamstring strength measures and muscle architecture was moderate to high, with I2 values of 58.58% and 88.03%, respectively.”
Page 5, columns 1–2, section 3.2, paragraph 1, sentence 3: The following sentence, which previously read:
“Two risk of bias assessments were also performed, the first (Cochrane risk of bias assessment tool) showing a low risk of bias overall within the randomized controlled studies included in this review (Fig. 2), the second identifying the results of this meta-analysis are not subject to publication bias (p < 0.001) with 250 and 663 “filed-away” studies needed to prove null effects of NHE interventions on strength and architecture, respectively.”
Should read:
“Two risk of bias assessments were also performed, the first (Cochrane risk of bias assessment tool) showing a low risk of bias overall within the randomized controlled studies included in this review (Fig. 2), the second identifying the results of this meta-analysis are not subject to publication bias (p < 0.001) with 178 and 663 “filed-away” studies needed to prove null effects of NHE interventions on strength and architecture, respectively.”
Pages 5–6, columns 2 (page 5) and 1 (page 6), section 3.3, paragraph 1, sentence 6: The following sentence, which previously read:
“The pooled summary of variance from the random-effects model was 0.374 (p = 0.009, 95% CI 0.94–0.655) for strength and 0.793 (p < 0.001, 95% CI 0.338–1.248) for muscle architecture.”
Should read:
“The pooled summary of variance from the random-effects model was 0.439 (p = 0.001, 95% CI 0.160–0.709) for strength and 0.793 (p < 0.001, 95% CI 0.338–1.248) for muscle architecture.”
Page 11, Table 1, Alt et al. [58] row: The cell entry in column 1, which previously read:
“Alt et al. [58]”
Should read:
“Alt et al. [48]”
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
About this article
Cite this article
Cuthbert, M., Ripley, N., McMahon, J.J. et al. Corrections to: The Effect of Nordic Hamstring Exercise Intervention Volume on Eccentric Strength and Muscle Architecture Adaptations: A Systematic Review and Meta-analyses. Sports Med 50, 101–102 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-019-01208-4
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-019-01208-4