Advertisement

Acute Effects of Foam Rolling on Range of Motion in Healthy Adults: A Systematic Review with Multilevel Meta-analysis

  • Jan WilkeEmail author
  • Anna-Lena Müller
  • Florian Giesche
  • Gerard Power
  • Hamid Ahmedi
  • David G. Behm
Systematic Review

Abstract

Background

Foam rolling (FR) has been demonstrated to acutely enhance joint range of motion (ROM). However, data syntheses pooling the effect sizes across studies are scarce. It is, furthermore, unknown which moderators affect the treatment outcome.

Objective

To quantify the immediate effects of FR on ROM in healthy adults.

Methods

A multilevel meta-analysis with a robust random effects meta-regression model was used to pool the standardized mean differences (SMD) between FR and no-exercise (NEX) as well as FR and stretching. The influence of the possible effect modifiers treatment duration, speed, targeted muscle, testing mode (active/passive ROM), sex, BMI, and study design was examined in a moderator analysis.

Results

Twenty-six trials with high methodological quality (PEDro scale) were identified. Compared to NEX, FR had a large positive effect on ROM (SMD: 0.74, 95% CI 0.42–1.01, p = 0.0002), but was not superior to stretching (SMD: − 0.02, 95% CI − 0.73 to 0.69, p = 0.95). Although the few individual study findings suggest that FR with vibration may be more effective than NEX or FR without vibration, the pooled results did not reveal significant differences (SMD: 6.75, 95% CI − 76.4 to 89.9, p = 0.49 and SMD: 0.66, 95% CI − 1.5 to 2.8, p = 0.32). According to the moderator analysis, most potential effect modifiers (e.g., BMI, speed or duration) do not have a significant impact (p > 0.05) but FR may be less effective in men (p < 0.05).

Conclusion

FR represents an effective method to induce acute improvements in joint ROM. The impact of moderators should be further elucidated in future research.

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Funding

No sources of funding were used to assist in the preparation of this article.

Conflict of Interest

Jan Wilke, Anna-Lena Müller, Florian Giesche, Gerard Powers, Hamid Ahmedi and David Behm declare that they have no conflicts of interest relevant to the content of this review.

References

  1. 1.
    Simenz CJ, Dugan CA, Ebben WP. Strength and conditioning practices of national basketball association strength and conditioning coaches. J Strength Cond Res. 2005;19:495–504.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Van Baar ME, Dekker J, Bosveld W. A survey of physical therapy goals and interventions for patients with back and knee pain. Phys Ther. 1998;78:33–42.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Roebroeck ME, Dekker J, Oostendorp RA, Bosveld W. Physiotherapy for patients with lateral ankle sprains: a prospective survey of practice patterns in Dutch primary health care. Physiotheraphy. 1998;84:421–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Wilke J, Niederer D, Vogt L, Banzer W. Head coaches’ attitudes towards injury prevention and use of related methods in basketball: a survey. Phys Ther Sport. 2018;32:133–9.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Harvey L, Herbert R, Crosbie J. Does stretching induce lasting increases in joint ROM? A systematic review. Physiother Res Int. 2002;7:1–13.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Decoster LC, Cleland J, Altieri C, et al. The effects of hamstring stretching on range of motion: a systematic literature review. Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2005;35:377–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Radford JA, Burns J, Buchbinder R, et al. Does stretching increase ankle dorsiflexion range of motion? A systematic review. Br J Sports Med. 2006;40:870–5.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Medeiros DM, Cini A, Sbruzzi G, et al. Influence of static stretching on hamstring flexibility in healthy young adults: systematic review and meta-analysis. Physiother Theory Pract. 2016;32:438–45.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Behm DG, Blazevich AJ, Kay AD, McHugh M. Systematic review: acute effects of muscle stretching on physical performance, range of motion and injury incidence in healthy active individuals. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2016;40(1):1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Simic L, Sarabon N, Markovic G. Does pre-exercise stretching inhibit maximal muscular performance? A meta-analytical review. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2013;23:131–48.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Cheatham SW. Roller massage: a descriptive survey of allied health professionals. J Sport Rehabil. 2018.  https://doi.org/10.1123/jsr.2017-0366.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kalichman L, Ben David C. Effect of self-myofascial release on myofascial pain, muscle flexibility, and strength: a narrative review. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2017;21:446–51.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Cheatham SW, Kolber MJ, Cain M, et al. The effects of self-myofascial release using a foam roll or roller massager on joint range of motion, muscle recovery, and performance: a systematic review. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2015;10:827–38.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Schoeder AN, Best TM. Is self myofascial release an effective preexercise and recovery strategy? A literature review. Curr Sports Med Rep. 2015;14:200–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Beardley C, Skarabot J. Effects of self-myofascial release: a systematic review. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2015;19:747–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Wiewelhove T, Döweling A, Schneider C, et al. A meta-analysis of the effects of foam rolling on performance and recovery. Front Physiol. 2019.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2019.00376.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Madoni SN, Costa PB, Coburn JW, et al. Effects of foam rolling on range of motion, peak torque, muscle activation, and the hamstrings-to-quadriceps strength ratios. J Strength Cond Res. 2018;32:1821–30.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Smith JC, Pridgeon B, Hall MG. Acute effect of foam rolling and dynamic stretching on flexibility and jump height. J Strength Cond Res. 2018;32:2209–15.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Lee CL, Chu IH, Chang WD, et al. Comparison of vibration rolling, nonvibration rolling, and static stretching as a warm-up exercise on flexibility, joint proprioception, muscle strength, and balance in young adults. J Sport Sci. 2018;36:2575–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    García-Gutiérrez MT, Guillén-Rogel P, Cochrane DJ, et al. Cross transfer acute effects of foam rolling with vibration on ankle dorsiflexion range of motion. J Musculoskel Neuron Interact. 2018;18:262–7.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    MacGregor LJ, Fairweather MM, Bennett RM, et al. The effect of foam rolling for three consecutive days on muscular efficiency and range of motion. Sports Med Open. 2018;4:26.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Hall MG, Smith JC. The effects of an acute bout of foam rolling on hip range of motion on different tissues. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2018;13:652–60.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Young JD, Spence AJ, Power G, et al. The addition of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation with roller massage alone or in combination did not increase pain tolerance or range of motion. J Sport Sci Med. 2018;17:525–32.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Wilke J, Niemeyer P, Niederer D, et al. Influence of foam rolling velocity on knee range of motion and tissue stiffness: a randomized controlled crossover trial. J Sport Rehabil. 2019.  https://doi.org/10.1123/jsr.2018-0041.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Laudner K. Acute effects of pectoralis minor self mobilization on shoulder motion and posture: a blinded and randomized placebo-controlled study in asymptomatic individuals. J Sport Rehabil. 2019.  https://doi.org/10.1123/jsr.2018-0220.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Smith JC, Washell BR, Aini MF, et al. Effects of static stretching and foam rolling on ankle dorsiflexion range of motion. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2019.  https://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0000000000001964.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Somers K, Aune D, Horten A, et al. Acute effects of gastrocnemius/soleus self-myofascial release vs. dynamic stretching on closed chain dorsiflexion. J Sport Rehabil. 2019.  https://doi.org/10.1123/jsr.2018-0199.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Cheatham SW, Stull KR, Kolber MJ. Comparison of a vibration roller and a nonvibration roller intervention on knee range of motion and pressure pain threshold: a randomized controlled trial. J Sport Rehabil. 2019;28:39–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. BMJ. 2009;339:b2535.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Wager E, Wiffen PJ. Ethical issues in preparing and publishing systematic reviews. J Evid Based Med. 2011;4:130–4.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Wilke J, Krause F, Vogt L, et al. What is evidence-based about myofascial chains: a systematic review. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2016;97:454–61.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Krause F, Wilke J, Vogt L, et al. Intermuscular force transmission along myofascial chains: a systematic review. J Anat. 2016;228:910–8.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Wilke J, Giesche F, Klier K, et al. Acute effects of resistance exercise on cognitive function in healthy adults: a systematic review with multilevel meta-analysis. Sports Med. 2019.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-019-01085-x.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Horsley T, Dingwall O, Sampson M. Checking reference lists to find additional studies for systematic reviews. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011;73:505.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Rosenthal R. Meta-analytic procedures for social research. Newbury Park: Sage Publications; 1993.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Curtin F, Altman DG, Elbourne D. Meta-analysis combining parallel and cross-over clinical trials I: continuous outcomes. Stat Med. 2002;21:2131–44.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Eiling E, Bryant AL, Petersen W, Murphy A, Hohmann E. Effects of menstrual-cycle hormone fluctuations on musculotendinous stiffness and knee joint laxity. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2007;15:126–32.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Hedges LV, Tipton E, Johnson MC. Robust variance estimation in meta-regression with dependent effect size estimates. Res Synth Methods. 2010;1:39–65.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Northey JM, Cherbuin, Pumpa NL, et al. Exercise interventions for cognitive function in adults older than 50: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Br J Sports Med. 2018;52:154–60.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Faraone SV. Interpreting estimates of treatment effects. P&T. 2008;33:700–3.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Fisher Z, Tipton E. Robumeta. An r package for robust variance estimation in meta-analysis. https://arxiv.org/abs/1503.02220.
  42. 42.
    Maher CG, Sherrington C, Herbert RD, et al. Reliability of the PEDro scale for rating quality of randomized controlled trials. Phys Ther. 2003;83:713–21.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Foley CF, Bhogal SK, Teasell RW, et al. Estimates of quality and reliability with the physiotherapy evidence-based database scale to assess the methodology of randomized controlled trials of pharmacological and nonpharmacological interventions. Phys Ther. 2006;86(6):817–24.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    de Morton NA. The PEDro scale is a valid measure of the methodological quality of clinical trials: a demographic study. Aust J Physiother. 2009;55:129–33.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    MacDonald GZ, Penney MD, Mullaley ME, et al. An acute bout of self-myofascial release increases range of motion without a subsequent decrease in muscle activation or force. J Strength Cond Res. 2013;27:812–21.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Sullivan KM, Silvey DB, Button DC, et al. Roller-massager application to the hamstrings increases sit-and-reach range of motion within five to ten seconds without performance impairments. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2013;8:228–36.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Halperin I, Aboodarda SJ, Button DC, et al. Roller massager improves range of motion of plantar flexor muscles without subsequent decreases in force parameters. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2014;9:92–102.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Mohr AR, Long BC, Goad CL. Effect of foam rolling and static stretching on passive hip-flexion range of motion. J Sport Rehabil. 2014;23:296–9.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Bushell JE, Dawson SM, Webster MM. Clinical relevance of foam rolling on hip extension angle in a functional lunge position. J Strength Cond Res. 2015;29:2397–403.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Skarabot J, Beardsley C, Stirn I. Comparing the effects of self-myofascial release with static stretching on ankle range of motion in adolescent athletes. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2015;10:203–11.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Bradbury-Squires DJ, Notfall JC, Sullivan K, et al. Roller massager application to the quadriceps and knee-joint range of motion and neuromuscular efficiciency during a lunge. J Athl Train. 2015;50:133–40.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Murray AM, Jones TW, Horobeanu C, et al. Sixty seconds of foam rolling does not affect functional flexibility or change muscle termperature in adolescent athletes. Int J Phys Ther. 2016;11:765–75.Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Kelly S, Beardsley C. Specific and cross-over effects of foam rolling on ankle dorsiflexion range of motion. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2016;11:544–51.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Su H, Chang NJ, Wu WL, et al. Acute effects of foam rolling, static stretching, and dynamic stretching during warm-ups on muscular flexibility and strength in young adults. J Sport Rehabil. 2017;26:469–77.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Behara B, Jacobson BH. Acute effects of deep tissue foam rolling and dynamic stretching on muscular strength, power, and flexibility in division I linemen. J Strength Cond Res. 2017;31:888–92.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Morales-Artacho AJ, Lacourpaille L, Guilhem G. Effects of warm-up on hamstring muscle stiffness: cycling vs foam rolling. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2017;1:1–11.Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Phillips J, Diggin D, King DL, et al. Effect of varying self-myofascial release duration on subsequent athletic performance. J Strength Cond Res. 2018;10:1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Fairall RR, Cabell L, Boergers RJ, et al. Acute effects of SMR and static stretching in overhead athletes with GIRD. J Strength Cond Res. 2017;21(648):652.Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    Behm DG, Wilke J. Do self-myofascial release devices release myofascia? Rolling mechanisms: a narrative review. Sports Med. 2019 (under review).Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    Hotfiel T, Swoboda B, Krinner S, Grim C, Engelhardt M, Uder M, et al. Acute effects of lateral thigh foam rolling on arterial tissue perfusion determined by spectral doppler and power doppler ultrasound. J Strength Cond Res. 2017;31(4):893–900.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Okamoto T, Masuhara M, Ikuta K. Acute effects of self-myofascial release using a foam roller on arterial function. J Strength Cond Res. 2014;28(1):69–73.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Heiss RM, Huettel M, Lutter C, Forst R, Hoppe M, Freiwald J, Roemer FW, Hotfiel T. Evaluation of tissue stiffness in athletes with different experience in foam rolling assessed by acoustic radiation force impulse elastography. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol. 2019;23:S1–6.Google Scholar
  63. 63.
    Young JD, Spence AJ, Behm DG. Roller massage decreases spinal excitability to the soleus. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2018;124(4):950–9.  https://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.00732.2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Aboodarda SJ, Spence AJ, Button DC. Pain pressure threshold of a muscle tender spot increases following local and non-local rolling massage. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2015;16:265.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-015-0729-5.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Cavanaugh MT, Doweling A, Young JD, Quigley PJ, Hodgson DD, Whitten JH, et al. An acute session of roller massage prolongs voluntary torque development and diminishes evoked pain. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2016.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-016-3503-y.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Schleip R. Fascial plasticity—a new neurobiological explanation: part 2. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2003;7:104–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Schleip R. Fascial plasticity—a new neurobiological explanation: part I. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2003;7:11–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Wu G, Ekedahl R, Stark B, Carlstedt T, Nilsson B, Hallin RG. Clustering of Pacinian corpuscle afferent fibres in the human median nerve. Experim Brain Res. 1999;126:399–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Weerapong P, Hume PA, Kolt GS. The mechanisms of massage and effects on performance, muscle recovery and injury prevention. Sports Med. 2005;35:235–56.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Lastova K, Nordvall M, Walter-Edwards M, Allnutt, Wong A. Cardiac autonomic and blood pressure responses to an acute foam rolling session. J Strength Cond Res. 2018;32(10):2825–30.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Mitchell JH, Schmidt RF. Cardiovascular reflex control by afferent fibers from skeletal muscle receptors. Bethesda: American Physiological Society; 1977.Google Scholar
  72. 72.
    Kostopoulos DN, Arthur J, Ingber RS, Larkin RW. Reduction of spontaneous electrical activity and pain perception of trigger points in the upper trapezius muscle through trigger point compression and passive stretching. J Musculoskelet Pain. 2008;16:266–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Pearcey GE, Bradbury-Squires DJ, Kawamoto JE, Drinkwater EJ, Behm DG, Button DC. Foam rolling for delayed-onset muscle soreness and recovery of dynamic performance measures. J Athl Train. 2015;50:5–13.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Cabido CE, Bergamini JC, Andrade AG, Lima FV, Menzel HJ, Chagas MH. Acute effect of constant torque and angle stretching on range of motion, muscle passive properties, and stretch discomfort perception. J Strength Cond Res. 2014;28(4):1050–7.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    Hoge KM, Ryan ED, Costa PB, Herda TJ, Walter AA, Stout JR, Cramer JT. Gender differences in musculotendinous stiffness and range of motion after an acute bout of stretching. J Strength Cond Res. 2010;24(10):2618–26.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  76. 76.
    Etnyre BR, Lee EJ. Chronic and acute flexibility of men and women using three different stretching techniques. Res Q Exerc Sport. 1988;59(3):222–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. 77.
    Cipriani DJ, Terry ME, Haines MA, Tabibnia AP, Lyssanova O. Effect of stretch frequency and sex on the rate of gain and rate of loss in muscle flexibility during a hamstring–stretching program: a randomized single-blind longitudinal study. J Strength Cond Res. 2012;26(8):2119–29.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  78. 78.
    Sterne JA, Sutton AJ, Ioannidis JP, Terrin N, Jones DR, Lau J, Carpenter J, Rücker G, et al. Recommendations for examining and interpreting funnel plot asymmetry in meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials. BMJ. 2011;343:d4002.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  79. 79.
    Zwetsloot PP, van der Naald M, Sena ES, Howells DW, IntHout J, De Groot JA, Chamuleau SA, MacLeod MR, Wever KE. Standardized mean differences cause funnel plot distortion in publication bias assessments. Elife. 2017.  https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.24260.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Sports MedicineGoethe University FrankfurtFrankfurtGermany
  2. 2.Department of Preventive and Sports Medicine, Institute of Occupational, Social and Environmental MedicineGoethe University FrankfurtFrankfurtGermany
  3. 3.School of Human Kinetics and RecreationMemorial University of NewfoundlandSt. John’sCanada

Personalised recommendations