Skip to main content

The Role of Hypernetworks as a Multilevel Methodology for Modelling and Understanding Dynamics of Team Sports Performance

Abstract

Despite its importance in many academic fields, traditional scientific methodologies struggle to cope with analysis of interactions in many complex adaptive systems, including team sports. Inherent features of such systems (e.g. emergent behaviours) require a more holistic approach to measurement and analysis for understanding system properties. Complexity sciences encompass a holistic approach to research on collective adaptive systems, which integrates concepts and tools from other theories and methods (e.g. ecological dynamics and social network analysis) to explain functioning of such systems in their natural environments. Multilevel networks and hypernetworks comprise novel and potent methodological tools for assessing team dynamics at more sophisticated levels of analysis, increasing their potential to impact on competitive performance in team sports. Here, we discuss how concepts and tools derived from studies of multilevel networks and hypernetworks have the potential for revealing key properties of sports teams as complex, adaptive social systems. This type of analysis can provide valuable information on team performance, which can be used by coaches, sport scientists and performance analysts for enhancing practice and training. We examine the relevance of network sciences, as a sub-discipline of complexity sciences, for studying the dynamics of relational structures of sports teams during practice and competition. Specifically, we explore the benefits of implementing multilevel networks, in contrast to traditional network techniques, highlighting future research possibilities. We conclude by recommending methods for enhancing the applicability of hypernetworks in analysing team dynamics at multiple levels.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

References

  1. 1.

    Passos P, Araújo D, Davids K, et al. Interpersonal dynamics in sport: the role of artificial neural networks and three-dimensional analysis. Behav Res Methods. 2006;38(4):683–91. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03193901.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Davids K, Kingsbury D, Bennett S, et al. Information-movement coupling: implications for the organisation of research and practice during acquisition of self-paced extrinsic timing skills. J Sports Sci. 2001;19(2):117–27.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Araújo D, Diniz A, Passos P, et al. Decision making in social neurobiological systems modelled as transitions in dynamic pattern formation. Adapt Behav. 2014;22(1):21–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Duarte R, Araújo D, Correia V, et al. Sport teams as superorganisms: implications of biological models for research and practice in team sports performance analysis. Sports Med. 2012;42(8):633–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Parrish J, Edelstein-Keshet L. Complexity, pattern, and evolutionary trade-offs in animal aggregations. Science. 1999;284(2):99–101.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Araújo D, Davids K. Team synergies in sport: theory and measures. Front Psychol. 2016;7:1449. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01449.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Johnson JH, Iravani P. The multilevel hypernetwork dynamics of complex systems of robot soccer agents. ACM Trans Auton Adapt Syst. 2007;2:1–23. https://doi.org/10.1145/1242060.1242062.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Ramos J, Lopes R, Marques P, et al. Hypernetworks reveal compound variables that capture cooperative and competitive interactions in a soccer match. Front Psychol. 2017;8:1379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Davids K, Handford C, Williams M. The natural physical alternative to cognitive theories of motor behaviour: an invitation for interdisciplinary research in sports science? J Sports Sci. 1994;12:495–528. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640419408732202.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Araújo D, Davids K, Hristovski R. The ecological dynamics of decision making in sport. Psychol Sport Exerc. 2006;7(6):653–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Vilar L, Araújo D, Davids K, et al. Science of winning soccer: emergent pattern-forming dynamics in association football. J Syst Sci Complex. 2013;26:73–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Silva P, Chung D, Carvalho T, et al. Practice effects on intra-team synergies in football teams. Hum Mov Sci. 2016;46:39–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Balague N, Torrents C, Hristovski R, et al. Overview of complex systems in sport. J Syst Sci Complex. 2013;26(1):4–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Efatmaneshnik M, Ryan M. A general framework for measuring system complexity. Complexity. 2016;21(1):533–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Araújo D, Passos P, Esteves P, et al. The micro-macro link in understanding sport tactical behaviours: integrating information and action at different levels of system analysis in sport. Mov Sport Sci Sci Mot. 2015;89:53–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Davids K, Araújo D, Vilar L, et al. An ecological dynamics approach to skill acquisition: implications for development of talent in sport. Talent Dev Excell. 2013;5(1):21–34.

    Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Agras H, Ferragut C, Abraldes J. Match analysis in futsal: a systematic review. Int J Perform Anal Sport. 2016;16(2):652–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Sarmento H, Clemente FM, Araújo D, et al. What performance analysts need to know about research trends in Association Football (2012–2016): a systematic review. Sports Med. 2018;48(4):799–836.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Dey P, Ganguly M, Roy S. Network centrality based team formation: a case study on T-20 cricket. Appl Comput Inform. 2017;13(2):161–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Jarvie D. Do long-time team-mates lead to better team performance? A social network analysis of data from Major League Baseball. Sports Med. 2018;48(11):2659–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Sargent J, Bedford A. Evaluating Australian football league player contributions using interactive network simulation. J Sports Sci Med. 2013;12:116–21.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Passos P, Davids K, Araújo D, et al. Networks as a novel tool for studying team ball sports as complex social systems. J Sci Med Sport. 2011;14(2):170–6.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Yamamoto Y, Yokoyama K. Common and unique network dynamics in football games. PLoS One. 2011;6(12):1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Ribeiro J, Silva P, Duarte R, et al. Team sports performance analysed through the lens of social network theory: implications for research and practice. Sports Med. 2017;47(9):1689–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Clemente F, Couceiro MS, Martins F, et al. Using network metrics to investigate football team players’ connections: a pilot study. Motriz. 2014;20(3):262–71.

    Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Clemente F, Couceiro MS, Martins F, et al. Using network metrics in soccer. J Hum Kinet. 2015;45:123–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Gama J, Passos P, Davids K, et al. Network analysis and intra-team activity in attacking phases of professional football. Int J Perform Anal Sport. 2014;14(3):692–708.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Mukherjee S. Complex network analysis in cricket: community structure, player’s role and performance index. Adv Complex Syst. 2013. https://doi.org/10.1142/s0219525913500318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Duch J, Waitzman JS, Amaral LAN. Quantifying the performance of individual players in a team activity. PLoS One. 2010. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0010937.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Fewell JH, Armbruster D, Ingraham J, et al. Basketball teams as strategic networks. PLoS One. 2012;1:4. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0047445.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Travassos B, Bourbousson J, Esteves PT, et al. Adaptive behaviours of attacking futsal teams to opposition defensive formations. Hum Mov Sci. 2016;47:98–105.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Gonçalves B, Coutinho D, Santos S, et al. Exploring team passing networks and player movement dynamics in youth association football. Plos One. 2017;12:1. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0171156.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Pina TJ, Paulo A, Araújo D. Network characteristics of successful performance in Association Football: a study on the UEFA Champions League. Front Psychol. 2017;8:1173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Ramos J, Lopes R, Araújo D. What’s next in complex networks? Capturing the concept of attacking play in invasive team sports. Sports Med. 2017;48(1):17–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Grund TU. Network structure and team performance: the case of English Premier League soccer teams. Soc Netw. 2012;34(4):682–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Johnson J. Hypernetworks for reconstructing the dynamics of multilevel systems. In: European Conference on Complex Systems. Oxford, UK; 2006.

  37. 37.

    Johnson J. Multidimensional events in multilevel systems. In: Albeverio S, Andrey D, Giordano P, Vancheri A, editors. The dynamics of complex urban systems: an interdisciplinary approach. Heidelberg: Physica-Verlag; 2008. p. 311–34.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Johnson J. Hypernetworks in the science of complex systems. London: Imperial College Press; 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Johnson JH. Hypernetworks: multidimensional relationships in multilevel systems. Eur Phys J Spec Top. 2016;225:1037–52. https://doi.org/10.1140/epjst/e2016-02653-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Boccaletti S, Bianconi G, Criado R, et al. The structure and dynamics of multilayer networks. Phys Rep. 2014;544:1–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physrep.2014.07.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Borgatti SP. Centrality and network flow. Soc Netw. 2005;27:55–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Cheng W, Cox J, Whitlock P. Random walks on graphs and Monte Carlo methods. Math Comput Simul. 2017;135:86–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to João Ribeiro.

Ethics declarations

Funding

Duarte Araújo was partially funded by the Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia, under Grant UID/DTP/UI447/2013 to CIPER–Centro Interdisciplinar para o Estudo da Performance Humana (unit 447). Rui Lopes was partially funded by the Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia and Instituto de Telecomunicações, under Grant UID/EEA/50008/2019. No other sources of funding were used to assist in the preparation of this article.

Conflict of interest

João Ribeiro, Keith Davids, Duarte Araújo, Pedro Silva, João Ramos, Rui Lopes and Júlio Garganta declare that they have no conflicts of interest relevant to the content of this article.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ribeiro, J., Davids, K., Araújo, D. et al. The Role of Hypernetworks as a Multilevel Methodology for Modelling and Understanding Dynamics of Team Sports Performance. Sports Med 49, 1337–1344 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-019-01104-x

Download citation