Is Muscular Fitness Associated with Future Health Benefits in Children and Adolescents? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Longitudinal Studies
- 678 Downloads
No previous systematic review has quantitatively examined the association between muscular fitness during childhood and adolescence and health parameters later in life.
The aim was to systematically review and meta-analyze the current evidence for a prospective association between muscular fitness in childhood and adolescence and future health status.
Two authors systematically searched MEDLINE, EMBASE and SPORTDiscus electronic databases and conducted manual searching of reference lists of selected articles. Relevant articles were identified by the following criteria: apparently healthy children and adolescents aged 3–18 years with muscular fitness assessed at baseline (e.g., handgrip, standing long jump, sit-ups, among others), and a follow-up period of ≥ 1 year. The outcome measures were anthropometric and adiposity measurements and cardiometabolic, bone and musculoskeletal health parameters. Two authors independently extracted data.
Thirty studies were included in the meta-analysis, yielding a total of 21,686 participants. The meta-analysis found a significant, moderate-large (p < 0.05) effect size between muscular fitness at baseline and body mass index (r = − 0.14; 95% confidence interval (CI) − 0.21 to − 0.07), skinfold thickness (r = − 0.32; 95% CI − 0.40 to − 0.23), homeostasis model assessment estimated insulin resistance (r = − 0.10; 95% CI − 0.16 to − 0.05), triglycerides (r = − 0.22; 95% CI − 0.30 to − 0.13), cardiovascular disease risk score (r = − 0.29; 95% CI − 0.39 to − 0.18), and bone mineral density (r = 0.166; 95% CI 0.086 to 0.243) at follow-up.
A prospective negative association was observed between muscular fitness in childhood/adolescence and adiposity and cardiometabolic parameters in later life, together with a positive association for bone health. There is inconclusive evidence for low back pain benefits.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
AGH is a Miguel Servet Fellow (Instituto de Salud Carlos III—CP18/0150). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Conflict of interest
Antonio García-Hermoso, Rodrigo Ramírez-Campillo, and Mikel Izquierdo declare that they have no conflicts of interest relevant to the content of this review.
- 6.Committee PAGA. Physical Activity Guidelines Advisory Committee Scientific Report. Washington, DC: US Department of Health and Human Services; 2018.Google Scholar
- 7.World Health Organization. Global health estimates: deaths by cause, age, sex and country, 2000–2012. Geneva: WHO; 2014. p. 9.Google Scholar
- 10.García-Hermoso A, Cavero-Redondo I, Ramírez-Vélez R, et al. Muscular strength as a predictor of all-cause mortality in apparently healthy population: a systematic review and meta-analysis of data from approximately 2 million men and women. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2018;99(10):2100–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 14.Green S, Higgins J. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. Version; 2005.Google Scholar
- 20.Wells G, Shea B, O’Connell D, et al. The Newcastle–Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of nonrandomised studies in meta-analyses. http://www.ohri.ca/programs/clinical_epidemiology/oxford.asp. Accessed Oct 20, 2018.
- 22.Nieminen P, Lehtiniemi H, Vähäkangas K, et al. Standardised regression coefficient as an effect size index in summarising findings in epidemiological studies. Epidemiol Biostat Public Health. 2013;10(4):1–15.Google Scholar
- 25.Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. 2nd ed. Hillsdale: Erlbaum; 1988.Google Scholar
- 75.Ma VY, Chan L, Carruthers KJ. Incidence, prevalence, costs, and impact on disability of common conditions requiring rehabilitation in the United States: stroke, spinal cord injury, traumatic brain injury, multiple sclerosis, osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, limb loss, and back pain. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2014;95(5):986–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar