Advertisement

Sports Medicine

, Volume 49, Issue 6, pp 917–929 | Cite as

What is the Evidence for and Validity of Return-to-Sport Testing after Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Surgery? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

  • Kate E. WebsterEmail author
  • Timothy E. Hewett
Systematic Review

Abstract

Background

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) return-to-sport (RTS) test batteries are popular and are employed to test athletes’ sport performance and help ensure a safe return to sport.

Objective

To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine: (1) the proportion of patients who passed RTS test batteries after ACL reconstruction, (2) whether passing RTS test batteries increased rates of return to play, and (3) whether passing RTS test batteries reduced subsequent rates of knee and ACL injury.

Methods

Five databases (PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, and SPORTDiscus) were searched to identify relevant studies and data were extracted regarding the number of patients who passed the RTS test battery, as well as subsequent RTS rates and re-injury data when available. Results were combined using proportional and risk-ratio meta-analyses.

Results

Eighteen studies met eligibility criteria. Proportional meta-analysis showed that only 23% of patients passed RTS test batteries. One study showed that passing an RTS test battery led to greater RTS rates. Two studies showed passing RTS test batteries did not significantly reduce the risk of a further knee injury (risk ratio (RR) = 0.28 (95% CI 0.04–0.94), p = 0.09) and five studies showed that passing RTS test batteries did not reduce the risk for all subsequent ACL injuries (RR = 0.80 (95% CI 0.27–2.3), p = 0.7). However, passing an RTS test battery did significantly reduce the risk for subsequent graft rupture (RR = 0.40 (95% CI 0.23–0.69), p < 0.001], although it increased the risk for a subsequent contralateral ACL injury (RR = 3.35 (95% CI 1.52–7.37), p = 0.003].

Conclusion

These analyses shows that there are equivocal findings in terms of the validity of current RTS test batteries in relation to reduction of the risk of graft rupture and contralateral ACL injuries. These findings have implications for RTS advice given to patients based on the results of RTS test batteries, and further work is needed to validate the criteria currently used and determine the true value.

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Funding

No sources of funding were used to assist in the preparation of this article

Conflicts of Interest

Kate Webster and Timothy Hewett declare that they have no conflicts of interest relevant to the content of this review.

Author Contributions

Both authors contributed to the design, analyses and reporting for this manuscript. Both authors read and approved the final submitted manuscript.

Supplementary material

40279_2019_1093_MOESM1_ESM.docx (25 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 24 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Feucht MJ, Cotic M, Saier T, Minzlaff P, Plath JE, Imhoff AB, et al. Patient expectations of primary and revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2016;24(1):201–7.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-014-3364-z.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ardern CL, Taylor NF, Feller JA, Webster KE. Fifty-five per cent return to competitive sport following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis including aspects of physical functioning and contextual factors. Br J Sports Med. 2014;48(21):1543–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ardern CL, Webster KE, Taylor NF, Feller JA. Return to sport following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the state of play. Br J Sports Med. 2011;45(7):596–606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Dekker TJ, Godin JA, Dale KM, Garrett WE, Taylor DC, Riboh JC. Return to sport after pediatric anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and its effect on subsequent anterior cruciate ligament injury. J Bone Jt Surg Am. 2017;99(11):897–904.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Morgan MD, Salmon LJ, Waller A, Roe JP, Pinczewski L. Fifteen-year survival of endoscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in patients aged 18 years and younger. Am J Sports Med. 2016;44(2):384–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Paterno MV, Rauh MJ, Schmitt LC, Ford KR, Hewett TE. Incidence of second ACL injuries 2 years after primary ACL reconstruction and return to sport. Am J Sports Med. 2014;42(7):1567–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Webster KE, Feller JA, Leigh W, Richmond AK. Younger patients are at increased risk for graft rupture and contralateral injury after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med. 2014;42(3):641–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Wiggins AJ, Grandhi RK, Schneider DK, Stanfield D, Webster KE, Myer GD. Risk of secondary injury in younger athletes after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Sports Med. 2016;44(7):1861–76.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546515621554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Webster KE, Feller JA. Exploring the high reinjury rate in younger patients undergoing anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med. 2016;44(11):2827–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Dingenen B, Gokeler A. Optimization of the return-to-sport paradigm after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a critical step back to move forward. Sports Med. 2017;47(8):1487–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    van Melick N, van Cingel RE, Brooijmans F, Neeter C, van Tienen T, Hullegie W, et al. Evidence-based clinical practice update: practice guidelines for anterior cruciate ligament rehabilitation based on a systematic review and multidisciplinary consensus. Br J Sports Med. 2016;50(24):1506–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ellman MB, Sherman SL, Forsythe B, LaPrade RF, Cole BJ, Bach BR Jr. Return to play following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2015;23(5):283–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Panariello RA, Stump TJ, Allen AA. Rehabilitation and return to play following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Oper Tech Sports Med. 2017;25(3):181–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Gokeler A, Welling W, Zaffagnini S, Seil R, Padua D. Development of a test battery to enhance safe return to sports after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2017;25(1):192–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Herbst E, Hoser C, Hildebrandt C, Raschner C, Hepperger C, Pointner H, et al. Functional assessments for decision-making regarding return to sports following ACL reconstruction. Part II: clinical application of a new test battery. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2015;23(5):1283–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Davies GJ, McCarty E, Provencher M, Manske RC. ACL return to sport guidelines and criteria. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2017;10:307–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman D, the PRISMA Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Ann Intern Med. 2009;151(4):264–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Quality assessment tool for observational cohort and cross-sectional studies. 2014. https://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/health-pro/guidelines/in-develop/cardiovascular-risk-reduction/tools/cohort.
  19. 19.
    Krych A, Woodcock J, Morgan J, Levy B, Stuart M, Dahm D. Factors associated with excellent 6-month functional and isokinetic test results following ACL reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2015;23(4):1053–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Sousa PL, Krych AJ, Cates RA, Levy BA, Stuart MJ, Dahm DL. Return to sport: Does excellent 6-month strength and function following ACL reconstruction predict midterm outcomes? Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2017;25(5):1356–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Logerstedt D, Di Stasi S, Grindem H, Lynch A, Eitzen I, Engebretsen L, et al. Self-reported knee function can identify athletes who fail return-to-activity criteria up to 1 year after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a Delaware-Oslo ACL cohort study. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2014;44(12):914–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Grindem H, Snyder-Mackler L, Moksnes H, Engebretsen L, Risberg MA. Simple decision rules can reduce reinjury risk by 84% after ACL reconstruction: the Delaware-Oslo ACL cohort study. Br J Sports Med. 2016;50(13):804–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Nawasreh Z, Logerstedt D, Cummer K, Axe M, Risberg MA, Snyder-Mackler L. Functional performance 6 months after ACL reconstruction can predict return to participation in the same preinjury activity level 12 and 24 months after surgery. Br J Sports Med. 2018;52(6):375.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Wellsandt E, Failla MJ, Snyder-Mackler L. Limb symmetry indexes can overestimate knee function after anterior cruciate ligament injury. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2017;47(5):334–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Welling W, Benjaminse A, Seil R, Lemmink K, Zaffagnini S, Gokeler A. Low rates of patients meeting return to sport criteria 9 months after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a prospective longitudinal study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2018.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-018-4916-4.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Faltstrom A, Hagglund M, Kvist J. Functional performance among active female soccer players after unilateral primary anterior aruciate ligament reconstruction compared with knee-healthy controls. Am J Sports Med. 2017;45(2):377–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Graziano J, Chiaia T, de Mille P, Nawabi DH, Green DW, Cordasco FA. Return to sport for skeletally immature athletes after ACL reconstruction: preventing a second injury using a quality of movement assessment and quantitative measures to address modifiable risk factors. Orthop J Sports Med. 2017;5(4):2325967117700599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Kyritsis P, Bahr R, Landreau P, Miladi R, Witvrouw E. Likelihood of ACL graft rupture: not meeting six clinical discharge criteria before return to sport is associated with a four times greater risk of rupture. Br J Sports Med. 2016;50(15):946–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Luo TD, Ashraf A, Dahm DL, Stuart MJ, McIntosh AL. Femoral nerve block is associated with persistent strength deficits at 6 months after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in pediatric and adolescent patients. Am J Sports Med. 2015;43(2):331–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Beischer S, Senorski EH, Thomee C, Samuelsson K, Thomee R. Young athletes return too early to knee-strenuous sport, without acceptable knee function after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2018;26(7):1966–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Di Stasi SL, Logerstedt D, Gardinier ES, Snyder-Mackler L. Gait patterns differ between ACL-reconstructed athletes who pass return-to-sport criteria and those who fail. Am J Sports Med. 2013;41(6):1310–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Ebert JR, Edwards P, Yi L, Joss B, Ackland T, Carey-Smith R, et al. Strength and functional symmetry is associated with post-operative rehabilitation in patients following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2018;13(3):389–400.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Thomee R, Neeter C, Gustavsson A, Thomee P, Augustsson J, Eriksson B, et al. Variability in leg muscle power and hop performance after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2012;20(6):1143–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Toole AR, Ithurburn MP, Rauh MJ, Hewett TE, Paterno MV, Schmitt LC. Young athletes cleared for sports participation after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: how many actually meet recommended return-to-sport criterion cutoffs? J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2017;47(11):825–33.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Webster KE, Feller JA. Return to level I sports after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: Evaluation of age, sex, and readiness to return criteria. Orthop J Sports Med. 2018;6(8):2325967118788045.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Losciale JM, Zdeb RM, Ledbetter L, Reiman MP, Sell TC. The association between passing return-to-sport criteria and second anterior cruciate ligament injury risk: a systematic review with meta-analysis. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2018;2018:1–52.  https://doi.org/10.2519/jospt.2019.8190.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Paterno MV, Ford KR, Myer GD, Heyl R, Hewett TE. Limb asymmetries in landing and jumping 2 years following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Clin J Sport Med. 2007;17(4):258–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Paterno MV, Rauh MJ, Schmitt LC, Ford KR, Hewett TE. Incidence of contralateral and ipsilateral anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury after primary ACL reconstruction and return to sport. Clin J Sport Med. 2012;22(2):116–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Ardern CL, Glasgow P, Schneiders A, Witvrouw E, Clarsen B, Cools A, et al. 2016 Consensus statement on return to sport from the First World Congress in Sports Physical Therapy, Bern. Br J Sports Med. 2016;50(14):853–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Allied HealthLa Trobe UniversityMelbourneAustralia
  2. 2.Department of Orthopedic SurgeryMayo ClinicRochesterUSA
  3. 3.Department of Physiology and Biomedical EngineeringMayo ClinicRochesterUSA
  4. 4.Sports Medicine CenterMayo ClinicRochesterUSA
  5. 5.Department of Physical Medicine and RehabilitationMayo ClinicRochesterUSA

Personalised recommendations