Development of Foundational Movement Skills: A Conceptual Model for Physical Activity Across the Lifespan
- 1.7k Downloads
Evidence supports a positive association between competence in fundamental movement skills (e.g., kicking, jumping) and physical activity in young people. Whilst important, fundamental movement skills do not reflect the broad diversity of skills utilized in physical activity pursuits across the lifespan. Debate surrounds the question of what are the most salient skills to be learned which facilitate physical activity participation across the lifespan. In this paper, it is proposed that the term ‘fundamental movement skills’ be replaced with ‘foundational movement skills’. The term ‘foundational movement skills’ better reflects the broad range of movement forms that increase in complexity and specificity and can be applied in a variety of settings. Thus, ‘foundational movement skills’ includes both traditionally conceptualized ‘fundamental’ movement skills and other skills (e.g., bodyweight squat, cycling, swimming strokes) that support physical activity engagement across the lifespan. A proposed conceptual model outlines how foundational movement skill competency can provide a direct or indirect pathway, via specialized movement skills, to a lifetime of physical activity. Foundational movement skill development is hypothesized to vary according to culture and/or geographical location. Further, skill development may be hindered or enhanced by physical (i.e., fitness, weight status) and psychological (i.e., perceived competence, self-efficacy) attributes. This conceptual model may advance the application of motor development principles within the public health domain. Additionally, it promotes the continued development of human movement in the context of how it leads to skillful performance and how movement skill development supports and maintains a lifetime of physical activity engagement.
The authors thank Adrian Edmunds of Nodding Dog for his assistance in creating the figure for this manuscript.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Author RMH is supported through an Australian Government Research Training Program Scholarship. DRL is supported by an ARC Future Fellowship.
Conflict of interest
Ryan Hulteen, Lisa Barnett, Philip Morgan, David Stodden, and David Lubans declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- 2.Eime RM, Young JA, Harvey JT, Charity MJ, Payne WR. A systematic review of the psychological and social benefits of participation in sport for children and adolescents: informing development of a conceptual model of health through sport. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2013;10(1):1–21. https://doi.org/10.1186/1479-5868-10-98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 22.Gallahue DL, Ozmun JC, Goodway JD. Understanding motor development: infants, children, adolescents, adults. 7th ed. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill; 2012.Google Scholar
- 23.Clark JE, Metcalfe JS. The mountain of motor development: a metaphor. In: Clark JE, Humphrey JH, editors. Motor development: research and reviews. Reston: National Association of Sport and Physical Education; 2002. p. 163–90.Google Scholar
- 31.Paterson DH, Warburton DE. Physical activity and functional limitations in older adults: a systematic review related to Canada’s physical activity guidelines. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2010;7(38):1–22.Google Scholar
- 33.Guralnik JM, Simonsick EM, Ferrucci L, Glynn RJ, Berkman LF, Blazer DG, et al. A short physical performance battery assessing lower extremity function: association with self-reported disability and prediction of mortality and nursing home admission. J Gerontol. 1994;49(2):85–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 34.Seefeldt V. Developmental motor patterns: implications for elementary school physical education. In: Nadeau CH, Halliwell WR, Newell M, Roberts C, editors. Psychology of motor behavior and sport. Champaign: Human Kinetics; 1980. p. 314–23.Google Scholar
- 35.Haubenstricker JL, Seefeldt V. Acquisition of motor skills during childhood. In: Seefeldt V, editor. Physical activity & well-being. Reston: American Alliance for Health, Physical Education, Recreation, and Dance; 1986. p. 49–110.Google Scholar
- 36.Langendorfer SJ, Roberton MA, Stodden DF. Biomechanical aspects of the development of object projection skills. In: De Ste Croix M, Korff T, editors. Paediatric biomechanics and motor control: theory and application. Oxford: Routledge; 2011.Google Scholar
- 37.Côté J, Baker J, Abernethy B. From play to practice. Expert performance in sports: advances in research on sport expertise. Champaign: Human Kinetics; 2003.Google Scholar
- 38.Côté J, Hay J. Children’s involvement in sport: a developmental perspective. Psychological foundations of sport. Boston: Merrill; 2002.Google Scholar
- 39.Balyi I, Hamilton A. Long-term athlete development: trainability in childhood and adolescence. Windows of opportunity. Optimal trainability. Victoria: National Coaching Institute British Columbia & Advanced Training and Performance Ltd; 2004.Google Scholar
- 45.Burton AW, Miller DE. Movement skill assessment. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics; 1998.Google Scholar
- 47.Hulteen RM, Lander NJ, Morgan PJ, Barnett LM, Robertson SJ, Lubans DR. Validity and reliability of field-based measures for assessing movement skill competency in lifelong physical activities: a systematic review. Sports Med. 2015;45(10):1443–54. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-015-0357-0.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 58.Harter S, Connell J. A model of the relationship among children’s academic achievement and their self perceptions of competence, control, and motivational orientation. In: Nicholls JG, editor. The development of achievement motivation. Greenwich: JAI Press; 1984. p. 219–50.Google Scholar
- 59.Bandura A. Social foundations of thought and action: a social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall; 1986.Google Scholar
- 64.Barnett LM, Morgan PJ, van Beurden E, Beard JR. Perceived sports competence mediates the relationship between childhood motor skill proficiency and adolescent physical activity and fitness: a longitudinal assessment. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2008;5(40):1–12. https://doi.org/10.1186/1479-5868-5-40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar