Effects of Rest Interval Duration in Resistance Training on Measures of Muscular Strength: A Systematic Review
- 1.6k Downloads
Rest interval (RI) duration is an important resistance-training variable underlying gain in muscular strength. Recommendations for optimal RI duration for gains in muscular strength are largely inferred from studies examining the acute resistance training effects, and the generalizability of such findings to chronic adaptations is uncertain.
The goals of this systematic literature review are: (i) to aggregate findings and interpret the studies that assessed chronic muscular strength adaptations to resistance training interventions involving different RI durations, and (ii) to provide evidence-based recommendations for exercise practitioners and athletes.
The review was performed according to the PRISMA guidelines with a literature search encompassing five databases. Methodological quality of the studies was evaluated using a modified version of the Downs and Black checklist.
Twenty-three studies comprising a total of 491 participants (413 males and 78 females) were found to meet the inclusion criteria. All studies were classified as being of good to moderate methodological quality; none of the studies were of poor methodological quality.
The current literature shows that robust gains in muscular strength can be achieved even with short RIs (< 60 s). However, it seems that longer duration RIs (> 2 min) are required to maximize strength gains in resistance-trained individuals. With regard to untrained individuals, it seems that short to moderate RIs (60–120 s) are sufficient for maximizing muscular strength gains.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflicts of Interest
Jozo Grgic, Brad J. Schoenfeld, Mislav Skrepnik, Timothy B. Davies, and Pavle Mikulic declare that they have no conflicts of interest relevant to the content of this review.
No external sources of funding were used to assist in the preparation of this article.
- 4.Cheema BS, Chan D, Fahey P, et al. Effect of progressive resistance training on measures of skeletal muscle hypertrophy, muscular strength and health-related quality of life in patients with chronic kidney disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sports Med. 2014;44(8):1125–38.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 6.Baechle TR, Earle RW. Essentials of strength training and conditioning. 2nd ed. Champaign: Human Kinetics; 2000.Google Scholar
- 29.Robinson JM, Stone MH, Johnson RL, et al. Effects of different weight training exercise/rest intervals on strength, power, and high intensity exercise endurance. J Strength Cond Res. 1995;9(4):216–21.Google Scholar
- 41.Simão R, Polito M, Miranda H, et al. Analysis of different rest intervals between sets in strength training program. Fit Perf J. 2006;5(5):290–4.Google Scholar
- 42.Mohamadimofrad A, Nikbakht M, Habibi A, et al. Comparison of 3 different rest times in resistance training plan of footballers maximum power in leg squat and bench press. Life Sci J. 2013;10(7):528–33.Google Scholar
- 43.Cassetty JL. Comparison of 30 and 60 second rest periods between sets of a resistance training program. Masters thesis, Oklahoma State University. 2000.Google Scholar
- 44.Holmes CJ. The effects of rest period lengths on muscle hypertrophy and intra-exercise performance. Masters thesis, University of Central Missouri. 2016.Google Scholar
- 45.Peers DH. Differing rest intervals: Effect on recovery heart rate and strength. Masters thesis, Lamar University. 2013.Google Scholar
- 46.Reed BL. Comparison of 30 and 90 second rest periods between sets of a resistance training program. Masters thesis, Oklahoma State University. 1998.Google Scholar
- 52.Kraemer WJ, Ratamess NA, Fry AC, et al. Strength testing: development and evaluation of methodology. In: Maud PJ, Champaign FC, editors. Physiological assessment of human fitness. Champaign: Human Kinetics; 2006. p. 119–50.Google Scholar
- 53.Garber CE, Blissmer B, Deschenes MR, et al. American College of Sports Medicine position stand, Quantity and quality of exercise for developing and maintaining cardiorespiratory, musculoskeletal, and neuromotor fitness in apparently healthy adults: guidance for prescribing exercise. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2011;43(7):1334–59.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar