What’s Next in Complex Networks? Capturing the Concept of Attacking Play in Invasive Team Sports

Review Article

Abstract

The evolution of performance analysis within sports sciences is tied to technology development and practitioner demands. However, how individual and collective patterns self-organize and interact in invasive team sports remains elusive. Social network analysis has been recently proposed to resolve some aspects of this problem, and has proven successful in capturing collective features resulting from the interactions between team members as well as a powerful communication tool. Despite these advances, some fundamental team sports concepts such as an attacking play have not been properly captured by the more common applications of social network analysis to team sports performance. In this article, we propose a novel approach to team sports performance centered on sport concepts, namely that of an attacking play. Network theory and tools including temporal and bipartite or multilayered networks were used to capture this concept. We put forward eight questions directly related to team performance to discuss how common pitfalls in the use of network tools for capturing sports concepts can be avoided. Some answers are advanced in an attempt to be more precise in the description of team dynamics and to uncover other metrics directly applied to sport concepts, such as the structure and dynamics of attacking plays. Finally, we propose that, at this stage of knowledge, it may be advantageous to build up from fundamental sport concepts toward complex network theory and tools, and not the other way around.

References

  1. 1.
    Passos P, Araújo D, Volossovitch A. Performance analysis in team sports. London: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group; 2017.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Glazier PS. Game, set and match? Substantive issues and future directions in performance analysis. Sports Med. 2010;40(8):625–34.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hughes M, Franks IM. The essentials of performance analysis: an introduction, vol. xxxii. London: Routledge; 2008. p. 312.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Frencken W. Soccer tactics: dynamics of small-sided games and full-sized matches. Groningen: University of Groningen—Faculty of Medical Sciences; 2012.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Vilar L, Araújo D, Davids K, et al. The role of ecological dynamics in analysing performance in team sports. Sports Med. 2012;42(1):1–10.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dutt-Mazumder A, Button C, Robins A, et al. Neural network modelling and dynamical system theory: are they relevant to study the governing dynamics of association football players? Sports Med. 2011;41:1003–17. doi:10.2165/11593950-000000000-00000.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bartlett R, Button C, Robins M, et al. Analysing team coordination patterns from player movement trajectories in soccer: methodological considerations. Int J Perform Anal Sport. 2012;12(2):398–424.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Davids K, Araújo D, Shuttleworth R. Applications of dynamical systems theory to football. Sci Footb V. 2005;537:550.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Araújo D, Davids K. Team synergies in sport: theory and measures. Front Psychol. 2016;7:1449 (eCollection 2016).CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Chinellato DD, de Aguiar MA, Epstein IR, et al. Dynamical response of networks under external perturbations: exact results. 2007. Preprint arXiv:0705.4607.
  11. 11.
    Silva P, Chung D, Carvalho T, et al. Practice effects on intra-team synergies in football teams. Hum Mov Sci. 2016;46:39–51.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Duch J, Waitzman JS, Amaral LAN. Quantifying the performance of individual players in a team activity. PLoS One. 2010;5(6):e10937.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Passos P, Davids K, Araújo D, et al. Networks as a novel tool for studying team ball sports as complex social systems. J Sci Med Sport. 2011;14(2):170–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Grund TU. Network structure and team performance: the case of English Premier League soccer teams. Soc Netw. 2012;34(4):682–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Travassos B, Bourbousson J, Esteves PT, et al. Adaptive behaviours of attacking futsal teams to opposition defensive formations. Hum Mov Sci. 2016;47:98–105.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Freeman LC. Visualizing social networks. J Soc Struct. 2000;1(1):4.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Rocha L. Exploring patterns of empirical networks. Umeå: Umeå University, Department of Physics; 2011. p. 66.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Moody J, McFarland D, Bender-Demoll S. Dynamic network visualization. AJS. 2005;110(4):1206–41.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Fewell JH, Armbruster D, Ingraham J, et al. Basketball teams as strategic networks. PLoS One. 2012;7(11):e47445.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Newman MEJ. Networks: an introduction, vol. xi. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2010. p. 772.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Brandes U, Freeman L, Wagner D. Social networks. In: RT, editor. Handbook of graph drawing and visualization. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2012.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Eccles DW, Tenenbaum G. Why an expert team is more than a team of experts: a cognitive conceptualization of team coordination and communication in sport. J Sport Exerc Psychol. 2004;26:542–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Duarte R, Araújo D, Freire L, et al. Intra-and inter-group coordination patterns reveal collective behaviors of football players near the scoring zone. Hum Mov Sci. 2012;31(6):1639–51.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Bender-deMoll S, McFarland DA. The art and science of dynamic network visualization. J Soc Struct. 2006;7(2):1–38.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Hill SA, Braha D. Dynamic model of time-dependent complex networks. Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2010;82(4):046105.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Araújo D, Lopes RJ, Ramos J, et al. A final à lupa: alemanha pressionante, Argentina recuada. Lisbon: Jornal Público Online. 2014. http://www.publico.pt/desporto/noticia/a-final-a-lupa-pressao-sustentada-da-alemanha-venceu-uma-argentina-recuada-e-a-procura-do-contraataque-1662863. Accessed 4 Sep 2017.
  27. 27.
    Lucchesi M. Attacking aoccer: a tactical analysis. Spring City: Reedswain Publishing; 2001.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Rocha L, Masuda N. Random walk centrality for temporal networks. New J Phys. 2014;16(6):063023.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Borgatti SP. Centrality and network flow. Soc Netw. 2005;27(1):55–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Pena JL, Touchette H. A network theory analysis of football strategies. 2012. Preprint arXiv:1206.6904.
  31. 31.
    Clemente FM, Martins FML, Kalamaras D, et al. General network analysis of national soccer teams in FIFA World Cup 2014. Int J Perform Anal Sport. 2015;15(1):80–96.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Clemente FM, Couceiro MS, Martins FML, et al. Using network metrics in soccer: a macro-analysis. J Hum Kinet. 2015;45(1):123–34.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Correia V, Araújo D, Duarte R, et al. Changes in practice task constraints shape decision-making behaviours of team games players. J Sci Med Sport. 2012;15(3):244–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Newman MEJ. A measure of betweenness centrality based on random walks. Soc Netw. 2005;27(1):39–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Bonacich P. Power and centrality: a family of measures. Am J Sociol. 1987;92(5):1170–82.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Noh JD, Rieger H. Random walks on complex networks. Phys Rev Lett. 2004;92(11):118701.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Stephenson K, Zelen M. Rethinking centrality: methods and examples. Soc Netw. 1989;11(1):1–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Bonacich P. Factoring and weighting approaches to status scores and clique identification. J Math Sociol. 1972;2(1):113–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Cook KS, Emerson RM, Gillmore MR, et al. The distribution of power in exchange networks: theory and experimental results. Am J Sociol. 1983;89(2):275–305.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Braha D, Bar-Yam Y. From centrality to temporary fame: dynamic centrality in complex networks: research articles. Complex. 2006;12(2):59–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Reagans R, Zuckerman EW. Networks, diversity, and productivity: the social capital of corporate R&D teams. Organ Sci. 2001;12(4):502–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Sparrowe RT, Liden RC, Wayne SJ, et al. Social networks and the performance of individuals and groups. Acad Manag J. 2001;44(2):316–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Balkundi P, Kilduff M. The ties that lead: a social network approach to leadership. Leadersh Q. 2006;17(4):419–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Cross R, Cummings JN. Tie and network correlates of individual performance in knowledge-intensive work. Acad Manag J. 2004;47(6):928–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Rapoport A. Spread of information through a population with socio-structural bias: I. Assumption of transitivity. Bull Math Biophys. 1953;15(4):523–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Easley D, Kleinberg JY. Networks, crowds, and markets: reasoning about a highly connected world. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Barzel B, Barabási A-L. Universality in network dynamics. Nat Phys. 2013;9(10):673–81.CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Holme P, Ghoshal G. Dynamics of networking agents competing for high centrality and low degree. Phys Rev Lett. 2006;96(9):098701.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Pacheco JM, Traulsen A, Nowak MA. Coevolution of strategy and structure in complex networks with dynamical linking. Phys Rev Lett. 2006;97(25):258103.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Van Segbroeck S, Santos FC, Pacheco JM. Adaptive contact networks change effective disease infectiousness and dynamics. PLoS Comput Biol. 2010;6(8):e1000895.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Shaw LB, Schwartz IB. Fluctuating epidemics on adaptive networks. Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2008;77(6):066101.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Barabasi A-L. The origin of bursts and heavy tails in human dynamics. Nature. 2005;435(7039):207–11.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Guillaume J-L, Latapy M. Bipartite graphs as models of complex networks. Phys A. 2006;371(2):795–813.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Lames M, Erdmann J, Walter F. Oscillations in football: order and disorder in spatial interactions between the two teams. Int J Sport Psychol. 2010;41:85–6.Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Frencken W, Lemmink K, Delleman N, et al. Oscillations of centroid position and surface area of soccer teams in small-sided games. Eur J Sport Sci. 2011;11(4):215–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Fonseca S, Milho J, Travassos B, et al. Measuring spatial interaction behavior in team sports using superimposed Voronoi diagrams. Int J Perform Anal Sport. 2013;13(1):179–89.Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Kossinets G, Watts DJ. Empirical analysis of an evolving social network. Science. 2006;311(5757):88–90.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    McPherson M, Smith-Lovin L, Cook JM. Birds of a feather: homophily in social networks. Annu Rev Sociol. 2001;27(1):415–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Expert P, Evans TS, Blondel VD, et al. Uncovering space-independent communities in spatial networks. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2010;108(19):7663–8. doi:10.1073/pnas.1018962108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Crandall DJ, Backstrom L, Cosley D, et al. Inferring social ties from geographic coincidences. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2010;107(52):22436–41. doi:10.1073/pnas.1006155107.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Johnson JH, Iravani P. The multilevel hypernetwork dynamics of complex systems of robot soccer agents. ACM Trans Auton Adapt Syst. 2007;2(2):5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.ISCTE-Instituto Universitário de LisboaLisbonPortugal
  2. 2.Universidade Europeia, Laureate International UniversitiesLisbonPortugal
  3. 3.Instituto de TelecomunicaçõesLisbonPortugal
  4. 4.CIPER, Faculdade de Motricidade HumanaUniversidade de LisboaLisbonPortugal

Personalised recommendations