Skip to main content

Activity Demands During Multi-Directional Team Sports: A Systematic Review

Abstract

Background

Late-stage rehabilitation programs often incorporate ‘sport-specific’ demands, but may not optimally simulate the in-game volume or intensity of such activities as sprinting, cutting, jumping, and lateral movement.

Objective

The aim of this review was to characterize, quantify, and compare straight-line running and multi-directional demands during sport competition.

Data Sources

A systematic review of PubMed, CINAHL, SPORTDiscus, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases was conducted.

Study Eligibility Criteria

Studies that reported time-motion analysis data on straight-line running, accelerations/decelerations, activity changes, jumping, cutting, or lateral movement over the course of an entire competition in a multi-directional sport (soccer, basketball, lacrosse, handball, field hockey, futsal, volleyball) were included.

Study Appraisal and Synthesis Methods

Data was organized based on sport, age level, and sex and descriptive statistics of the frequency, intensity, time, and volume of the characteristics of running and multi-directional demands were extracted from each study.

Results

Eighty-one studies were included in the review (n = 47 soccer, n = 11 basketball, n = 9 handball, n = 7 field hockey, n = 3 futsal, n = 4 volleyball). Variability of sport demand data was found across sports, sexes, and age levels. Specifically, soccer and field hockey demanded the most volume of running, while basketball required the highest ratio of high-intensity running to sprinting. Athletes change activity between 500 and 3000 times over the course of a competition, or once every 2–4 s. Studies of soccer reported the most frequent cutting (up to 800 per game), while studies of basketball reported the highest frequency of lateral movement (up to 450 per game). Basketball (42–56 per game), handball (up to 90 per game), and volleyball (up to 35 per game) were found to require the most jumping.

Limitations

These data may provide an incomplete view of an athlete’s straight-line running load, considering that only competition and not practice data was provided.

Conclusions

Considerable variability exists in the demands of straight-line running and multi-directional demands across sports, competition levels, and sexes, indicating the need for sports medicine clinicians to design future rehabilitation programs with improved specificity (including the type of activity and dosage) to these demands.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

References

  1. 1.

    Bradley PS, Di Mascio M, Peart D, et al. High-intensity activity profiles of elite soccer players at different performance levels. J Strength Cond Res. 2010;24:2343–51.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Gabbett TJ, Mulvey MJ. Time-motion analysis of small-sided training games and competition in elite women soccer players. J Strength Cond Res. 2008;22:543–52.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Matthew D, Delextrat A. Heart rate, blood lactate concentration, and time-motion analysis of female basketball players during competition. J Sports Sci. 2009;27:813–21.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Scanlan A, Dascombe B, Reaburn P. A comparison of the activity demands of elite and sub-elite Australian men’s basketball competition. J Sports Sci. 2011;29:1153–60.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Povoas SC, Ascensao AA, Magalhaes J, et al. Physiological demands of elite team handball with special reference to playing position. J Strength Cond Res. 2014;28:430–42.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Chambers R, Gabbett TJ, Cole MH, et al. The use of wearable microsensors to quantify sport-specific movements. Sports Med. 2015;45:1065–81.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Windt J, Gabbett TJ, Ferris D, et al. Training load–injury paradox: is greater preseason participation associated with lower in-season injury risk in elite rugby league players? Br J Sports Med. 2017;51:645–50.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Blanch P, Gabbett TJ. Has the athlete trained enough to return to play safely? The acute:chronic workload ratio permits clinicians to quantify a player’s risk of subsequent injury. Br J Sports Med. 2016;50:471–5.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Gabbett TJ, Hulin BT, Blanch P, et al. High training workloads alone do not cause sports injuries: how you get there is the real issue. Br J Sports Med. 2016;50:444–5.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Gabbett TJ, Kennelly S, Sheehan J, et al. If overuse injury is a ‘training load error’, should undertraining be viewed the same way? Br J Sports Med. 2016;50:1017–8.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Buchheit M, Simpson BM. Player-tracking technology: half-full or half-empty glass? Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2017;12:S235–41.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Ford KR, Nguyen AD, Dischiavi SL, et al. An evidence-based review of hip-focused neuromuscular exercise interventions to address dynamic lower extremity valgus. Open Access J Sports Med. 2015;6:291–303.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Baechle TR, Earle RW. Essentials of strength and conditioning. 2nd ed. Champaign: Human Kinetics; 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Fulton J, Wright K, Kelly M, et al. Injury risk is altered by previous injury: a systematic review of the literature and presentation of causative neuromuscular factors. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2014;9:583–95.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. PLoS Med. 2009;6:e1000100.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Hootman JM, Dick R, Agel J. Epidemiology of collegiate injuries for 15 sports: summary and recommendations for injury prevention initiatives. J Athl Train. 2007;42:311–9.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Junge A, Dvorak J. Injury risk of playing football in Futsal World Cups. Br J Sports Med. 2010;44:1089–92.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Bere T, Kruczynski J, Veintimilla N, et al. Injury risk is low among world-class volleyball players: 4-year data from the FIVB Injury Surveillance System. Br J Sports Med. 2015;49:1132–7.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Xiang J, Collins CL, Liu D, et al. Lacrosse injuries among high school boys and girls in the United States: academic years 2008–2009 through 2011–2012. Am J Sports Med. 2014;42:2082–8.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Theilen TM, Mueller-Eising W, Wefers Bettink P, et al. Injury data of major international field hockey tournaments. Br J Sports Med. 2016;50:657–60.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977;33:159–74.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, et al. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Ann Intern Med. 2007;147:573–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Doherty C, Delahunt E, Caulfield B, et al. The incidence and prevalence of ankle sprain injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective epidemiological studies. Sports Med. 2014;44:123–40.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Akenhead R, Hayes PR, Thompson KG, et al. Diminutions of acceleration and deceleration output during professional football match play. J Sci Med Sport. 2013;16:556–61.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Anderson L, Orme P, Di Michele R, et al. Quantification of training load during one-, two- and three-game week schedules in professional soccer players from the English Premier League: implications for carbohydrate periodisation. J Sports Sci. 2016;34:1250–9.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Andersson H, Ekblom B, Krustrup P. Elite football on artificial turf versus natural grass: movement patterns, technical standards, and player impressions. J Sports Sci. 2008;26:113–22.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Aslan A, Acikada C, Guvenc A, et al. Metabolic demands of match performance in young soccer players. J Sports Sci Med. 2012;11:170–9.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Barros RM, Misuta MS, Menezes RP, et al. Analysis of the distances covered by first division Brazilian soccer players obtained with an automatic tracking method. J Sports Sci Med. 2007;6:233–42.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Bloomfield J, Polman R, O’Donoghue P. Physical demands of different positions in FA Premier League soccer. J Sports Sci Med. 2007;6:63–70.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Bradley PS, Sheldon W, Wooster B, et al. High-intensity running in English FA Premier League soccer matches. J Sports Sci. 2009;27:159–68.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Burgess DJ, Naughton G, Norton KI. Profile of movement demands of national football players in Australia. J Sci Med Sport. 2006;9:334–41.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Carling C, Bradley P, Mc Call A, et al. Match-to-match variability in high-speed running activity in a professional soccer team. J Sports Sci. 2016;1–9.

  33. 33.

    Carling C, Le Gall F, Dupont G. Analysis of repeated high-intensity running performance in professional soccer. J Sports Sci. 2012;30:325–36.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Casamichana D, Castellano J, Castagna C. Comparing the physical demands of friendly matches and small-sided games in semiprofessional soccer players. J Strength Cond Res. 2012;26:837–43.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Castagna C, D’ Ottavio S, Abt G. Activity profile of young soccer players during actual match play. J Strength Cond Res. 2003;17:775–80.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Castellano J, Blanco-Villasenor A, Alvarez D. Contextual variables and time-motion analysis in soccer. Int J Sports Med. 2011;32:415–21.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Castellano J, Puente A, Echeazarra I, et al. Influence of the number of players and the relative pitch area per player on heart rate and physical demands in youth soccer. J Strength Cond Res. 2015;29:1683–91.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Castellano J, Puente A, Echeazarra I, et al. Number of players and relative pitch area per player: comparing their influence on heart rate and physical demands in under-12 and under-13 football players. PLoS One. 2016;11:e0127505.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Clemente FM, Couceiro MS, Martins FM, et al. Activity profiles of soccer players during the 2010 World Cup. J Hum Kinet. 2013;38:201–11.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    da Silva NP, Kirkendall DT, Neto TLB. Movement patterns in elite Brazilian youth soccer. J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 2007;47:270–5.

    Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Dalen T, Ingebrigtsen J, Ettema G, et al. Player load, acceleration, and deceleration during forty-five competitive matches of elite soccer. J Strength Cond Res. 2016;30:351–9.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Datson N, Drust B, Weston M, et al. Match physical performance of elite female soccer players during international competition. J Strength Cond Res. 2016. doi:10.1519/JSC.0000000000001575.

    Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Dellal A, Owen A, Wong DP, et al. Technical and physical demands of small vs. large sided games in relation to playing position in elite soccer. Hum Mov Sci. 2012;31:957–69.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Di Mascio M, Bradley PS. Evaluation of the most intense high-intensity running period in English FA Premier League soccer matches. J Strength Cond Res. 2013;27:909–15.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Domene ÁM. Evaluation of movement and physiological demands of full-back and center-back soccer players using global positioning systems. J Hum Sport Exerc. 2013;8:1015–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Gregson W, Drust B, Atkinson G, et al. Match-to-match variability of high-speed activities in Premier League soccer. Int J Sports Med. 2010;31:237–42.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Harley JA, Barnes CA, Portas M, et al. Motion analysis of match-play in elite U12 to U16 age-group soccer players. J Sports Sci. 2010;28:1391–7.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Hewitt A, Norton K, Lyons K. Movement profiles of elite women soccer players during international matches and the effect of opposition’s team ranking. J Sports Sci. 2014;32:1874–80.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Hoppe MW, Slomka M, Baumgart C, et al. Match running performance and success across a season in German Bundesliga soccer teams. Int J Sports Med. 2015;36:563–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Iacono AD, Martone D, Cular D, et al. Game-profile-based training in soccer: a new field approach. J Strength Cond Res. 2016. doi:10.1519/JSC.0000000000001768.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Ingebrigtsen J, Dalen T, Hjelde GH, et al. Acceleration and sprint profiles of a professional elite football team in match play. Eur J Sport Sci. 2015;15:101–10.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Krustrup P, Mohr M, Ellingsgaard H, et al. Physical demands during an elite female soccer game: importance of training status. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2005;37:1242–8.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Lovell R, Abt G. Individualization of time-motion analysis: a case-cohort example. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2013;8:456–8.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Lovell R, Barrett S, Portas M, et al. Re-examination of the post half-time reduction in soccer work-rate. J Sci Med Sport. 2013;16:250–4.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Mallo J, Mena E, Nevado F, et al. Physical demands of top-class soccer friendly matches in relation to a playing position using global positioning system technology. J Hum Kinet. 2015;47:179–88.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Mara JK, Thompson KG, Pumpa KL, et al. Quantifying the high-speed running and sprinting profiles of elite female soccer players during competitive matches using an Optical Player Tracking System. J Strength Cond Res. 2016. doi:10.1519/JSC.0000000000001629.

    Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Mara JK, Thompson KG, Pumpa KL, et al. The acceleration and deceleration profiles of elite female soccer players during competitive matches. J Sci Med Sport. 2017;. doi:10.1016/j.jsams.2016.12.078.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Mayhew SR, Wenger HA. Time-motion analysis of professional soccer. J Hum Mov Stud. 1985;11:49–52.

    Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Mohr M, Krustrup P, Andersson H, et al. Match activities of elite women soccer players at different performance levels. J Strength Cond Res. 2008;22:341–9.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Mohr M, Krustrup P, Bangsbo J. Match performance of high-standard soccer players with special reference to development of fatigue. J Sports Sci. 2003;21:519–28.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Nedelec M, McCall A, Carling C, et al. The influence of soccer playing actions on the recovery kinetics after a soccer match. J Strength Cond Res. 2014;28:1517–23.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Njororai WWS. Physical demands of soccer: lessons from Team USA and Ghana matches in the 2010 FIFA World Cup. J Phys Educ Sport. 2012;12:407–12.

    Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Peñailillo L, Maya L, Niño G, et al. Salivary hormones and IgA in relation to physical performance in football. J Sports Sci. 2015;33:2080–7.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  64. 64.

    Rampinini E, Coutts AJ, Castagna C, et al. Variation in top level soccer match performance. Int J Sports Med. 2007;28:1018–24.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  65. 65.

    Rebelo A, Brito J, Seabra A, et al. Physical match performance of youth football players in relation to physical capacity. Eur J Sport Sci. 2014;14(Suppl 1):S148–56.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  66. 66.

    Rey E, Lago-Penas C, Lago-Ballesteros J, et al. The effect of a congested fixture period on the activity of elite soccer players. Biol Sport. 2010;27:181–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. 67.

    Rienzi E, Drust B, Reilly T, et al. Investigation of anthropometric and work-rate profiles of elite South American international soccer players. J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 2000;40:162–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. 68.

    Robinson G, O’ Donoghue P, Wooster B. Path changes in the movement of English Premier League soccer players. J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 2011;51:220–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. 69.

    Silva JR, Magalhaes J, Ascensao A, et al. Training status and match activity of professional soccer players throughout a season. J Strength Cond Res. 2013;27:20–30.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  70. 70.

    Stroyer J, Hansen L, Klausen K. Physiological profile and activity pattern of young soccer players during match play. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2004;36:168–74.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  71. 71.

    Vescovi JD. Sprint profile of professional female soccer players during competitive matches: Female Athletes in Motion (FAiM) study. J Sports Sci. 2012;30:1259–65.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  72. 72.

    Vescovi JD. Motion characteristics of youth women soccer matches: Female Athletes in Motion (FAiM) study. Int J Sports Med. 2014;35:110–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. 73.

    Wehbe GM, Hartwig TB, Duncan CS. Movement analysis of Australian National League soccer players using global positioning system technology. J Strength Cond Res. 2014;28:834–42.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  74. 74.

    Weston M, Drust B, Gregson W. Intensities of exercise during match-play in FA Premier League referees and players. J Sports Sci. 2011;29:527–32.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  75. 75.

    Withers RT, Maricic Z, Wasilewski S, et al. Match analyses of Australian professional soccer players. J Hum Mov Stud. 1982;8:159–76.

    Google Scholar 

  76. 76.

    Ben Abdelkrim N, Castagna C, El Fazaa S, et al. The effect of players’ standard and tactical strategy on game demands in men’s basketball. J Strength Cond Res. 2010;24:2652–62.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  77. 77.

    Ben Abdelkrim N, Castagna C, Jabri I, et al. Activity profile and physiological requirements of junior elite basketball players in relation to aerobic-anaerobic fitness. J Strength Cond Res. 2010;24:2330–42.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  78. 78.

    Ben Abdelkrim N, El Fazaa S, El Ati J. Time-motion analysis and physiological data of elite under-19-year-old basketball players during competition. Br J Sports Med. 2007;41:69–75 (discussion).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  79. 79.

    Conte D, Favero TG, Lupo C, et al. Time-motion analysis of Italian elite women’s basketball games: individual and team analyses. J Strength Cond Res. 2015;29:144–50.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  80. 80.

    Klusemann MJ, Pyne DB, Hopkins WG, et al. Activity profiles and demands of seasonal and tournament basketball competition. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2013;8:623–9.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  81. 81.

    McInnes SE, Carlson JS, Jones CJ, et al. The physiological load imposed on basketball players during competition. J Sports Sci. 1995;13:387–97.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  82. 82.

    Oba W, Okuda T. A cross-sectional comparative study of movement distances and speed of the players and a ball in basketball game. Int J Sport Health Sci. 2008;6:203–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  83. 83.

    Scanlan AT, Dascombe BJ, Kidcaff AP, et al. Gender-specific activity demands experienced during semiprofessional basketball game play. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2015;10:618–25.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  84. 84.

    Scanlan AT, Dascombe BJ, Reaburn P, et al. The physiological and activity demands experienced by Australian female basketball players during competition. J Sci Med Sport. 2012;15:341–7.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  85. 85.

    Scanlan AT, Tucker PS, Dascombe BJ, et al. Fluctuations in activity demands across game quarters in professional and semiprofessional male basketball. J Strength Cond Res. 2015;29:3006–15.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  86. 86.

    Torres-Ronda L, Ric A, Llabres-Torres I, et al. Position-dependent cardiovascular response and time-motion analysis during training drills and friendly matches in elite male basketball players. J Strength Cond Res. 2016;30:60–70.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  87. 87.

    Belka J, Hulka K, Safar M, et al. Analyses of time-motion and heart rate in elite female players (U19) during competitive handball matches. Kinesiology. 2014;46:33–43.

    Google Scholar 

  88. 88.

    Bojsen Michalsik L, Aagaard P. Physical demands in elite team handball: comparisons between male and female players. J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 2015;55:878–91.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  89. 89.

    Chelly MS, Hermassi S, Aouadi R, et al. Match analysis of elite adolescent team handball players. J Strength Cond Res. 2011;25:2410–7.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  90. 90.

    Luteberget LS, Spencer M. High-intensity events in international women’s team handball matches. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2017;12:56–61.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  91. 91.

    Manchado C, Pers J, Navarro F, et al. Time-motion analysis in women’s team handball: importance of aerobic performance. J Hum Sport Exerc. 2013;8:376–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  92. 92.

    Michalsik LB, Aagaard P, Madsen K. Locomotion characteristics and match-induced impairments in physical performance in male elite team handball players. Int J Sports Med. 2013;34:590–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  93. 93.

    Michalsik LB, Madsen K, Aagaard P. Match performance and physiological capacity of female elite team handball players. Int J Sports Med. 2014;35:595–607.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  94. 94.

    Michalsik LB, Madsen K, Aagaard P. Technical match characteristics and influence of body anthropometry on playing performance in male elite team handball. J Strength Cond Res. 2015;29:416–28.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  95. 95.

    Sibila M, Vuleta D, Pori P. Position-related differences in volume and intensity of large-scale cyclic movements of male players in handball. Kinesiology. 2004;36:58–68.

    Google Scholar 

  96. 96.

    Gabbett TJ. GPS analysis of elite women’s field hockey training and competition. J Strength Cond Res. 2010;24:1321–4.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  97. 97.

    Jennings D, Cormack SJ, Coutts AJ, et al. GPS analysis of an international field hockey tournament. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2012;7:224–31.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  98. 98.

    Jennings DH, Cormack SJ, Coutts AJ, et al. International field hockey players perform more high-speed running than national-level counterparts. J Strength Cond Res. 2012;26:947–52.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  99. 99.

    Lythe J, Kilding AE. Physical demands and physiological responses during elite field hockey. Int J Sports Med. 2011;32:523–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  100. 100.

    Spencer M, Lawrence S, Rechichi C, et al. Time-motion analysis of elite field hockey, with special reference to repeated-sprint activity. J Sports Sci. 2004;22:843–50.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  101. 101.

    White AD, MacFarlane N. Time-on-pitch or full-game GPS analysis procedures for elite field hockey? Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2013;8:549–55.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  102. 102.

    White AD, MacFarlane NG. Analysis of international competition and training in men’s field hockey by global positioning system and inertial sensor technology. J Strength Cond Res. 2015;29:137–43.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  103. 103.

    Barbero-Álvarez JC, Gómez López M, Barbero Álvarez V, et al. Heart rate and activity profile for young female soccer players. J Hum Sport Exerc. 2008;3:1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  104. 104.

    Dogramaci SN, Watsford ML, Murphy AJ. Time-motion analysis of international and national level futsal. J Strength Cond Res. 2011;25:646–51.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  105. 105.

    Dogramaci SN, Watsford ML, Murphy AJ. Activity profile differences between sub-elite futsal teams. Int J Exerc Sci. 2015;8:112–23.

    Google Scholar 

  106. 106.

    Makaje N, Ruangthai R, Arkarapanthu A, et al. Physiological demands and activity profiles during futsal match play according to competitive level. J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 2012;52:366–74.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  107. 107.

    Cortell-Tormo JM, Perez-Turpin JA, Chinchilla JJ, et al. Analysis of movement patterns by elite male players of beach volleyball. Percept Mot Skills. 2011;112:21–8.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  108. 108.

    Pérez-Turpin JA, Cortell-Tormo JM, Suárez-Llorca C, et al. Gross movement patterns in elite female beach volleyball. Kinesiology. 2009;41:212–9.

    Google Scholar 

  109. 109.

    Sheppard JM, Gabbett T, Taylor KL, et al. Development of a repeated-effort test for elite men’s volleyball. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2007;2:292–304.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  110. 110.

    Tillman MD, Hass CJ, Brunt D, et al. Jumping and landing techniques in elite women’s volleyball. J Sports Sci Med. 2004;3:30–6.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  111. 111.

    Hulin BT, Gabbett TJ, Caputi P, et al. Low chronic workload and the acute:chronic workload ratio are more predictive of injury than between-match recovery time: a two-season prospective cohort study in elite rugby league players. Br J Sports Med. 2016;50:1008–12.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  112. 112.

    Gabbett TJ. The training-injury prevention paradox: should athletes be training smarter and harder? Br J Sports Med. 2016;50:273–80.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  113. 113.

    Alentorn-Geli E, Mendiguchia J, Samuelsson K, et al. Prevention of anterior cruciate ligament injuries in sports. Part I: systematic review of risk factors in male athletes. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2014;22:3–15.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  114. 114.

    Shimokochi Y, Shultz SJ. Mechanisms of noncontact anterior cruciate ligament injury. J Athl Train. 2008;43:396–408.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  115. 115.

    Liu H, Garrett WE, Moorman CT, et al. Injury rate, mechanism, and risk factors of hamstring strain injuries in sports: a review of the literature. J Sport Health Sci. 2012;1:92–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  116. 116.

    Sigward SM, Powers CM. The influence of gender on knee kinematics, kinetics and muscle activation patterns during side-step cutting. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2006;21:41–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  117. 117.

    Bencke J, Curtis D, Krogshede C, et al. Biomechanical evaluation of the side-cutting manoeuvre associated with ACL injury in young female handball players. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2013;21:1876–81.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  118. 118.

    Dayakidis MK, Boudolos K. Ground reaction force data in functional ankle instability during two cutting movements. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2006;21:405–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  119. 119.

    Taylor JB, Ford KR, Nguyen AD, et al. Biomechanical comparison of single- and double-leg jump landings in the sagittal and frontal plane. Orthop J Sports Med. 2016;4:2325967116655158.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  120. 120.

    Piasecki DP, Spindler KP, Warren TA, et al. Intraarticular injuries associated with anterior cruciate ligament tear: findings at ligament reconstruction in high school and recreational athletes. An analysis of sex-based differences. Am J Sports Med. 2003;31:601–5.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  121. 121.

    Olsen OE, Myklebust G, Engebretsen L, et al. Injury mechanisms for anterior cruciate ligament injuries in team handball: a systematic video analysis. Am J Sports Med. 2004;32:1002–12.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  122. 122.

    Boden BP, Dean GS, Feagin JA Jr, et al. Mechanisms of anterior cruciate ligament injury. Orthopedics. 2000;23:573–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  123. 123.

    Boden BP, Torg JS, Knowles SB, et al. Video analysis of anterior cruciate ligament injury: abnormalities in hip and ankle kinematics. Am J Sports Med. 2009;37:252–9.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  124. 124.

    Hewett TE, Torg JS, Boden BP. Video analysis of trunk and knee motion during non-contact anterior cruciate ligament injury in female athletes: lateral trunk and knee abduction motion are combined components of the injury mechanism. Br J Sports Med. 2009;43:417–22.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  125. 125.

    Lian OB, Engebretsen L, Bahr R. Prevalence of jumper’s knee among elite athletes from different sports: a cross-sectional study. Am J Sports Med. 2005;33:561–7.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  126. 126.

    Hewett TE, Myer GD, Ford KR, et al. Biomechanical measures of neuromuscular control and valgus loading of the knee predict anterior cruciate ligament injury risk in female athletes: a prospective study. Am J Sports Med. 2005;33:492–501.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  127. 127.

    LaStayo PC, Woolf JM, Lewek MD, et al. Eccentric muscle contractions: their contribution to injury, prevention, rehabilitation, and sport. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2003;33:557–71.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  128. 128.

    Haitz K, Shultz R, Hodgins M, et al. Test–retest and interrater reliability of the functional lower extremity evaluation. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2014;44:947–54.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  129. 129.

    Brumitt J, Heiderscheit BC, Manske RC, et al. The lower-extremity functional test and lower-quadrant injury in NCAA division III athletes: a descriptive and epidemiologic report. J Sport Rehabil. 2016;25:219–26.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  130. 130.

    Ardern CL, Glasgow P, Schneiders A, et al. 2016 consensus statement on return to sport from the First World Congress in Sports Physical Therapy, Bern. Br J Sports Med. 2016;50:853–64.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  131. 131.

    Shrier I. Strategic Assessment of Risk and Risk Tolerance (StARRT) framework for return-to-play decision-making. Br J Sports Med. 2015;49:1311–5.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  132. 132.

    Jennings D, Cormack S, Coutts AJ, et al. The validity and reliability of GPS units for measuring distance in team sport specific running patterns. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2010;5:328–41.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jeffrey B. Taylor.

Ethics declarations

Funding

No sources of funding were used to assist in the conduct of this review or preparation of this article.

Conflicts of interest

Jeffrey B. Taylor, Alexis A. Wright, Steven L. Dischiavi, M. Allison Townsend and Adam R. Marmon declare that they have no conflicts of interest relevant to the content of this review.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Taylor, J.B., Wright, A.A., Dischiavi, S.L. et al. Activity Demands During Multi-Directional Team Sports: A Systematic Review. Sports Med 47, 2533–2551 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-017-0772-5

Download citation