Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Chronotype, Physical Activity, and Sport Performance: A Systematic Review

  • Systematic Review
  • Published:
Sports Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Many variables related to sport have been shown to have circadian rhythms. Chronotype is the expression of circadian rhythmicity in an individual, and three categories of chronotype are defined: morning types (M-types), evening types (E-types), and neither types (N-types). M-types show earlier peaks of several psychophysiological variables during the day than E-types. The effect of chronotype on athletic performance has not been extensively investigated.

Objective

The objective of the present review was to study the effect of chronotype on athletic performance and the psychophysiological responses to physical activity.

Methods

The present review adheres to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) reporting guidelines. We searched PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science for scientific papers using the keywords “chronotype”, “circadian typology”, “morningness”, and “eveningness” in combination with each of the words “sport”, “performance”, and “athletic.” Relevant reference lists were inspected. We limited the search results to peer-reviewed papers published in English from 1985 to 2015.

Results

Ten papers met our inclusion criteria. Rating of perceived exertion and fatigue scores in relation to athletic performances are influenced by chronotype: M-types perceived less effort when performing a submaximal physical task in the morning than did N- and E-types. In addition, M-types generally showed better athletic performances, as measured by race times, in the morning than did N- and E-types. Other results concerning chronotype effect on physiological responses to physical activity were not always consistent: heterogeneous samples and different kinds of physical activity could partially explain these discrepancies.

Conclusions

Sports trainers and coaches should take into account the influence of both the time of day and chronotype effect when scheduling training sessions into specific time periods.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Thun E, Bjorvatn B, Flo E, et al. Sleep, circadian rhythms, and athletic performance. Sleep Med Rev. 2015;23:1–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Reilly T, Waterhouse J. Sports performance: is there evidence that the body clock plays a role? Eur J Appl Physiol. 2009;106:321–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Starkie RL, Hargreaves M, Lambert DL, et al. Effect of temperature on muscle metabolism during submaximal exercise in humans. Exp Physiol. 1999;84:775–84.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Tafet GE, Idoyaga-Vargas VP, Abulafia DP, et al. Correlation between cortisol level and serotonin uptake in patients with chronic stress and depression. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2001;1:388–93.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Horne JA, Ostberg O. A self-assessment questionnaire to determine morningness–eveningness in human circadian rhythms. Int J Chronobiol. 1976;4:97–111.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Adan A, Archer SN, Hidalgo MP, et al. Circadian typology: a comprehensive review. Chronobiol Int. 2012;29:1153–75.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Vitale JA, Roveda E, Montaruli A, et al. Chronotype influences activity circadian rhythm and sleep: differences in sleep quality between weekdays and weekend. Chronobiol Int. 2015;32:405–15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Baehr E, Revelle W, Eastman CI. Individual differences in the phase and amplitude of the human circadian temperature rhythm: with an emphasis on morningness–eveningness. J Sleep Res. 2000;9:117–27.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Bailey SL, Heitkemper MM. Circadian rhythmicity of cortisol and body temperature: morningness–eveningness effects. Chronobiol Int. 2001;18:249–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Winget CM, DeRoshia CW, Holley DC. Circadian rhythms and athletic performance. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1985;17:498–516.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Atkinson G, Reilly T. Circadian variation in sports performance. Sports Med. 1996;21:292–312.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Cappaert TA. Time of day effect on athletic performance: an update. J Strength Cond Res. 2009;13:412–21.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Goel N, Basner M, Rao H, et al. Circadian rhythms, sleep deprivation, and human performance. Prog Mol Biol Transl Sci. 2013;119:155–90.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Ann Intern Med. 2009;4:264–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Hill DW, Cureton KJ, Collins MA, et al. Diurnal variations in responses to exercise of ‘morning types’ and ‘evening types’. J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 1988;28:213–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Atkinson G, Todd C, Reilly T, et al. Diurnal variation in cycling performance: influence of warm-up. J Sports Sci. 2005;23:321–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Burgoon PW, Holland GJ, Loy SF, et al. A comparison of morning and evening ‘types’ during maximum exercises. J Appl Sport Sci Res. 1992;6:115–9.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Sugawara J, Hamada Y, Nishijima T, et al. Diurnal variations of post-exercise parasympathetic nervous reactivation in different chronotypes. Jpn Heart J. 2001;42:163–71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Kunorozva L, Roden LC, Rae DE. Perception of effort in morning-type cyclists is lower when exercising in the morning. J Sports Sci. 2014;32:917–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Rae DE, Stephenson KJ, Roden LC. Factors to consider when assessing diurnal variation in sports performance: the influence of chronotype and habitual training time-of-day. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2015;115:1339–49.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. McNair DM, Lorr M, Droppleman LF. Manual for profile of mood states. San Diego: Educational and Industrial Testing Services; 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Vitale JA, Calogiuri G, Weydahl A. Influence of chronotype on responses to a standardized, self-paced walking task in the morning vs afternoon: a pilot study. Percept Motor Skills. 2013;116:1020–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Rossi A, Formenti D, Calogiuri G, et al. The effect of chronotype on psychophysiological responses during aerobic self-paced exercises. Percept Motor Skills. 2015;121:840–55.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Brown FM, Neft EE, LaJambe CM. Collegiate rowing crew performance varies by morningness–eveningness. J Strength Cond Res. 2008;22:1894–900.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Henst RHP, Jaspers RT, Roden LC, et al. A chronotype comparison of South African and Dutch marathon runners: the role of scheduled race start times and effects on performance. Chronobiol Int. 2015;32:858–68.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Facer-Childs E, Brandstaetter R. The impact of circadian phenotype and time since awakening on diurnal performance in athletes. Curr Biol. 2015;25:1–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Borbély AA. A two process model of sleep regulation. Hum Neurobiol. 1982;1:195–204.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Tamm AS, Lagerquist O, Ley AL, et al. Chronotype influences diurnal variations in the excitability of the human motor cortex and the ability to generate torque during a maximum voluntary contraction. J Biol Rhythms. 2004;24:211–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, Via Riccardo Galeazzi 4, 20161, Milan, Italy

    Jacopo Antonino Vitale

  2. UiT-The Arctic University of Norway, Alta, Norway

    Andi Weydahl

Authors
  1. Jacopo Antonino Vitale
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Andi Weydahl
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jacopo Antonino Vitale.

Ethics declarations

Funding

No sources of funding were used to assist in the preparation of the present review.

Conflict of interest

Jacopo Antonino Vitale and Andi Weydahl have no conflicts of interest relevant to the content of this review.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Vitale, J.A., Weydahl, A. Chronotype, Physical Activity, and Sport Performance: A Systematic Review. Sports Med 47, 1859–1868 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-017-0741-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-017-0741-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation