Skip to main content

Evidence-Based Prerequisites and Precursors of Athletic Talent: A Review

Abstract

Extensive findings related to nature and nurture in determining athletic talent (AT) have been reviewed. Available data demonstrate the important contribution of hereditary factors as well as the crucial importance of environmental prerequisites for identifying and developing AT. Recent publications provide examples of contemporary approaches intended to solve the problem of how to discover and nurture AT. A number of cross-sectional and longitudinal studies highlighted possibilities of revealing a predisposition to certain sports among youthful prospects, but were unable to predict attainment of world-class status. Data pertaining to Olympic champions indicate that their superiority compared with other elite athletes is determined by high intrinsic motivation, determination, dedication, persistence, and creativity. These salient manifestations of personality could be successfully recognized even in the initial stages of their preparation, where exceptionally gifted individuals manifested high learnability and a high rate of athletic improvement. Moreover, future champions were characterized by an exceptional attitude to training and a willingness to perform more voluminous and high-quality training routines. Exceptionally talented athletes in endurance, power, and combat sports attained world-class status after 4–7 years of specialized preparation, accumulating 3000–7000 h of purposeful training. This stands in contradiction to Ericsson’s theory of deliberate practice and the 10-year rule. In contrast, Olympic artistic gymnastics champions attained world-class status following an average of 9.7 years of specialized preparation, accumulating an average of 8918 h of specialized training. Apparently, the theory of 10,000 h of deliberate practice and the 10-year rule are selectively applicable to highly coordinative esthetic sports but not to general preparation trends in endurance, power, and combat sports.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  1. 1.

    Howe M, Davidson J, Sloboda J. Innate talents: reality or myth? Behav Brain Sci. 1998;21(3):339–407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Gagne F. Constructs and models pertaining to exceptional human abilities. In: Heller KA, Mönks FJ, Passow AH, editors. International handbook of research and development of giftedness and talent. New York: Pergamon Press; 1993. p. 69–87.

    Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Bloom B. Developing talent in young people. New York: Ballantine Books; 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Baker J, Schorer J, Cobley S. Talent identification and development in sport: international perspectives. London: Routledge; 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Vaeyens R, Gullich A, Warr CR, et al. Talent identification and promotion programmes of Olympic athletes. J Sports Sci. 2009;27(13):1367–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Hemery D. Sporting excellence: what makes a champion?. London: Collins Willow; 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Bouchard C, Malina RM, Perusse L. Genetics of fitness and physical performance. Champaign: Human Kinetics; 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Montgomery HE, Marshall R, Hemingway H, et al. Human gene for physical performance. Nature. 1998;393(6682):221–2.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Rankinen T, Roth SM, Bray MS, et al. Advances in exercise, fitness, and performance genomics. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2010;42(5):835–46.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Tucker R, Collins M. What makes champions? A review of the relative contribution of genes and training to sporting success. Br J Sports Med. 2012;46(8):555–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Ericsson KA, Krampe RT, Tesch-Romer C. The role of deliberate practice in the acquisition of expert performance. Psychol Rev. 1993;100(3):363–406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Ericsson KA. Deliberate practice and the modifiability of body and mind: toward a science of the structure and acquisition of expert and elite performance. Int J Sport Psychol. 2007;38:4–34.

    Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Feldman DH, Goldsmith L. Nature’s gambit: child prodigies and the development of human potential. New York: Teachers College Press; 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Zohar A. Individual differences in some special abilities are genetically influenced. Behav Brain Sci. 1998;21(3):431–2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Sloboda JA, Davidson JW, Howe MJA, et al. The role of practice in the development of performing musicians. Br J Psychol. 1996;87:287–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Williams AM, Reilly T. Talent identification and development in soccer. J Sports Sci. 2000;18(9):657–67.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Simonton DK. Talent and its development: an emergenic and epigenetic model. Psychol Rev. 1999;106(3):435–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Durand-Bush N, Salmela JH. The development and maintenance of expert athletic performance: perceptions of World and Olympic Champions. J Appl Sport Psychol. 2002;14:154–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Abbott A, Collins D, Sowerby K, et al. Developing the potential of young people in sport: a report for Sport Scotland by the University of Edinburgh. Edinburgh: Sport Scotland; 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Lidor R, Côté J, Hackfort D. To test or not to test? The use of physical skill tests in talent detection and in early phases of sport development. Int J Sport Exerc Psychol. 2009;7:131–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Hohmnann A, Seidel L. Scientific aspect of talent development. J Phys Educ. 2003;40(1):9–20.

    Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Anshel M, Lidor R. Talent detection programs in sport: The questionable use of psychological measures. J Sport Behav. 2009;35(3):239–66.

    Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Ford P, De Ste Croix M, Lloyd R, et al. The long-term athlete development model. Physiological evidence and application. J Sport Sci. 2011;29(4):389–402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Kovař R. Human variation in motor abilities and its genetic analysis. Praha: Carl University Press; 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Szopa J, Mleczko E, Cempla J. Variability and genetic conditionings of fundamental psychomotor and physiological traits in city population aged 7–62. Cracow: Monografie Zakładu Antropologii PAN; 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Szopa J, Mleczko E, Żychowska M, et al. Possibilities of determination of genetic conditionings of somatic and functional traits on the backgrounds of family studies. J Hum Kinet. 1999;2:21–36.

    Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Klissouras V. Heritability of adaptive variation: and old problem revisited. J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 1997;37:1–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Thomis MAI, Beunen GP, Van Leemputte M, et al. Inheritance of static and dynamic arm strength and some of its determinants. Acta Physiol Scand. 1998;163(1):59–71.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Lyakh V, Jaworski J, Wieczorek T. Genetic endowment of coordination motor abilities: a review of family and twin research. J Hum Kinet. 2007;17:25–40.

    Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Liach W. The effect of genetic and environmental factors on the development of motor coordination abilities in children aged 7–10 years. Phys Educ Sport. 2002;2:265–7.

    Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Thibault MC, Simoneau JA, Cote C, et al. Inheritance of human muscle enzymes adaptation to isokinetic strength training. Hum Hered. 1986;36:341–7.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Simoneau JA, Lortie G, Boulay MR, et al. Inheritance of human skeletal muscle and anaerobic capacity adaptation to high-intensity intermittent training. Int J Sports Med. 1986;7:167–71.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Prud’homme D, Bouchard C, Leblanc C, et al. Sensitivity of maximal aerobic power to training is genotype-dependent. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1984;16:489–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Malina R, Bouchard C. Sport and human genetics. Champaign: Human Kinetics; 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Issurin V. Building the modern athletes: scientific advancements and training innovations. Muskegon Heights: Ultimate Training Concepts; 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Ahmetov I, Fedotovskaya O. Sports genomics: current state of knowledge and future directions. Cell Mol Exerc Physiol. 2012;1(1):1–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Stepto N, Coffey G, Carey A, et al. Global gene expression in skeletal muscle from well-trained strength and endurance athletes. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2009;41:546–65.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Ahmetov I, Rogozkin V. Genes, athlete status and training: an overview. Med Sport Sci. 2009;54:43–71.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Gibbons T, Hill R, McConnell A, Forster T, et al. The path to excellence: a comprehensive view of development of U.S. Olympians who competed from 1984–1998. Colorado Springs: United States Olympic Committee; 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Gulbin K, Oldenziel J, Weissensteiner J. A look through the rear view mirror: developmental experiences and insights of high performance athletes. Talent Dev Excel. 2010;2(2):149–64.

    Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Weiss MR, Hayashi CT. All in the family: parent–child influences in competitive youth gymnastics. Pediatr Exerc Sci. 1995;7:36–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Côté J. The influence of the family in the development of talent in sport. Sport Psychol. 1999;13:395–417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Durand-Bush N. The development and maintenance of expert athletic performance: perceptions of Olympic and World champions, their parents and coaches. Ph.D. Thesis. Ontario: University of Ottawa; 2000.

  44. 44.

    Gould D, Dieffenbach K, Moffett A. The development of psychological talent in US Olympic Champions. Final grant report. Colorado Springs: United States Olympic Committee; 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Issurin V. Athletic talent. Identification and its development. Muskegon Heights: Ultimate Athletes Concepts; 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Hoare D. The Australian National Talent Search Programme. Coach Focus. 1996;31:3–4.

    Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Kozel J. Talent identification and development in Germany. Coach Focus. 1996;31:5–6.

    Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Balyi I. Planning for training and performance. The training to win phase. BC Coach; 1996. p. 9–26.

  49. 49.

    Fuchslocher J, Romann M, Gulbin J. Strategies to support developing talent. Schweiz Zeitschrift fuer Sportsmedizin. 2013;61(4):10–4.

    Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Elferink-Gemser M. Olympia exists: pushing boundaries for talented athletes. Arnhem: HAN University of Applied Sciences Press; 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Burk V. Stabile Strukturen und neue Tendenzen in Deutscher Olympischer Sportbund, Spiele der XXX. Olympiade London 2012. Auswertungen Analysen; 2013. p. 21–3.

  52. 52.

    Hodge T, Deakin J. Deliberate practice and expertise in the martial arts. The role of context in motor recall. J Sports Exerc Psychol. 1998;20:260–79.

    Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Baker J, Côté J, Abernethy B. Sport-specific training, deliberate practice and the development of expertise in team ball sports. J Appl Sport Psychol. 2003;15:12–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Riewald S, Snyder C. The path to excellence: a view on the athletic development of U.S. Olympians who competed from 2000–2012. Initial report: results of the talent identification and development. Colorado Springs: United States Olympic Committee; 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Barynina I, Vaitsekhovskii S. The aftermath of early sport specialization for highly qualified swimmers. Fitness Sports Rev Int. 1992;27(4):132–3.

    Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Moesch K, Elbe AM, Hauge MLT, et al. Late specialization: the key to success in centimeters, grams, or seconds (cgs) sports. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2011;21(6):E282–90.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Lombardo M, Deaner R. You can’t teach speed: sprinters falsify the deliberate practice model of expertise. Peer J. 2014;e445:1–31.

    Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Young BW, Salmela JH. Perception of training and deliberate practice of middle distance runners. Int J Sport Psychol. 2002;33:167–81.

    Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Hodges N, Kerr T, Starkes J, et al. Predicting performance times from deliberate practice hours for triathletes and swimmers: what, when, and where is practice important? J Exp Psychol Appl. 2004;10:219–37.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Helsen W, Starkes J, Hodges N, et al. Team sports and theory of deliberate practice. J Sport Exerc Psychol. 1998;20:12–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Memmert D, Baker J, Bertsch C. Play and practice in the development of sport-specific creativity in team ball sports. High Abil Stud. 2010;21(1):3–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Oldenziel K, Gagne F, Gulbin J. Factors affecting the rate of athlete development from novice to senior elite: how applicable is the 10-year rule. In: Klisouras V, Kellis S, Mouratidis I, editors. Proceedings of the 2004 Pre-Olympic Congress. Thessaloniki: Aristotle University of Thessaloniki; 2004. p. 174–5.

    Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Ozolin NG. Contemporary system of athletes’ preparation. Moscow: FiS Publisher; 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  64. 64.

    Harre D. Trainingslehre. Berlin: Sportverlag; 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  65. 65.

    Matveyev LP. Fundamentals of sport training. Moscow: Progress; 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  66. 66.

    Zatsiorsky V, Bulgakova N, Ragimov R, et al. Problem of athletic giftedness and selection in sport: directions and methodology of researches. Moscow Theory Pract Phys Cult. 1973;7:54–65.

    Google Scholar 

  67. 67.

    Siris P, Gaydarska P, Rachev K. Selection and giftedness prediction in track and field. Moscow: FiS Publisher; 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  68. 68.

    Pienaar AE, Spamer MJ, Steyn H. Identifying and developing rugby talent among 10-year-old boys: a practical model. J Sports Sci. 1998;16:691–9.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. 69.

    Lidor R, Falk B, Arnon M, et al. Measurement of talent in team-handball: the questionable use of motor and physical tests. J Strength Cond Res. 2005;19:318–25.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. 70.

    Roetert EP, Brown S, Piorkowski P, et al. Fitness comparisons among three different levels of elite tennis players. J Strength Cond Res. 1996;10:139–43.

    Google Scholar 

  71. 71.

    Reilly T, Williams AM, Nevill A, et al. A multidisciplinary approach to talent detection in soccer. J Sports Sci. 2000;18:695–702.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. 72.

    Falk B, Lidor R, Lander Y, et al. Talent identification and early development of elite water-polo players: a 2-year follow-up study. J Sports Sci. 2004;22:347–55.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. 73.

    Lidor R, Hershko Y, Bilkevitz A, et al. Measurement of talent in volleyball: 15-month follow-up of elite adolescent players. J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 2007;47:159–68.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. 74.

    Lidor R, Melnik Y, Bilkevitz A, et al. Measurement of talent in judo using a unique, judo-specific test. J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 2005;45:32–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. 75.

    Issurin V. Early precursors of athletic talent: evidence from a study among Olympic champions. Antropomotoryka. J Kinesiol Exerc Sci. 2015;70(25):13–7.

    Google Scholar 

  76. 76.

    Emrich E, Guellich A. Zur Evaluation des Fördersystems im Nachwuchsleistungssport. Leistungssport. 2005;1:78–86.

    Google Scholar 

  77. 77.

    Guellich A. Considering long-term sustainability in talent promotion. Implications for talent development in rowing. In: Proceedings of 18th FISA Youth Coaches Conference, Hamburg; 2013. p. 2–24.

  78. 78.

    Côté J, Hay J. Children’s involvement in sport: a developmental perspective. In: Psychological foundations of sport. Boston: Allyn & Bacon; 2002. p. 484–502.

  79. 79.

    Helsen WF, Hodges NJ, Van Winkel J. The roles of talent, physical precocity and practice in the development of soccer expertise. J Sports Sci. 2000;18:727–36.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  80. 80.

    Issurin V, Zuoziene I. Retrospective analysis of long-term preparation of outstanding athletes for earlier identification of athletic talent. Sport Sci (Vilnius). 2015;2(80):40–4.

    Google Scholar 

  81. 81.

    Law MP, Côté J, Ericsson KA. Characteristics of expert development in rhythmic gymnastics: a retrospective study. Int J Sport Exerc Psychol. 2008;5(1):82–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  82. 82.

    Arkayev L, Suchilin N. How to prepare champions. Theory and technology of highly qualified gymnasts preparing. Moscow: FiS Publisher; 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  83. 83.

    Bompa T. Theory and methodology of training—the key to athletic performance. Boca Raton: Kendall/Hunt; 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  84. 84.

    Platonov V, Sakhnovsky K. Preparation of young athlete. Kiev: Radianska shkola; 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  85. 85.

    Orlick T, Partington J. Mental links to excellence. Sport Psychol. 1988;2:105–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  86. 86.

    Blumenstein B, Orbach I. Mental practice in sport. Twenty case studies. New York: Nova Science Publishers; 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  87. 87.

    Mahoney MJ, Gabriel TJ, Perkins TS. Psychological skills and exceptional athletic performance. Sport Psychol. 1987;1:181–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  88. 88.

    Hanin YL. Emotions and athletic performance: individual zones of optimal functioning model. Eur Yearbook Sport Psychol. 1997;1:29–72.

    Google Scholar 

  89. 89.

    Abrahamsen FE, Roberts GC, Pensgaard AM. Achievement goals and gender effects on multidimensional anxiety in national elite sport. Psychol Sport Exerc. 2008;9(4):449–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  90. 90.

    Fletcher D, Sarkar M. A grounded theory of psychological resilience in Olympic champions. Psychol Sport Exerc. 2012;13(5):669–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  91. 91.

    Bottoni A, Gianfelici A, Tamburri R, et al. Talent selection criteria for Olympic distance triathlon. J Hum Sport Exerc. 2011;6(2):293–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  92. 92.

    Rees T, Hardy L, Guellich A, et al. The Great British medalists project: a review of current knowledge on the development of the world’s best sporting talent. Sports Med. 2016;46:1041–58.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The author is grateful to Mr. Mike Garmise for editing the English text and to Dr. Boris Blumenstein for valuable comments.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vladimir B. Issurin.

Ethics declarations

Funding

No funding was used to assist in the preparation of this review.

Conflicts of interest

The author has no conflicts of interest that are relevant to the content of this review.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Issurin, V.B. Evidence-Based Prerequisites and Precursors of Athletic Talent: A Review. Sports Med 47, 1993–2010 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-017-0740-0

Download citation

Keywords

  • Elite Athlete
  • Deliberate Practice
  • Combat Sport
  • Figure Skating
  • Psychological Skill