Exercise-Based Interventions for Injury Prevention in Tackle Collision Ball Sports: A Systematic Review
The injury burden in collision sports is relatively high compared to other team sports. Therefore, participants in these sports would benefit by having effective injury prevention programs. Exercise-based interventions have successfully reduced injuries in soccer, but evidence on exercise-based interventions in tackle collision sports is limited.
The objective of this review is to systematically examine the evidence of exercise-based intervention programs reducing injuries in tackle collision sports.
PubMed, EBSCOHost, and Web of Science were searched for articles published between January 1995 and December 2015. The methodological quality was assessed using an adapted Cochrane Bone Joint and Muscle Trauma Group quality assessment tool.
The inclusion criteria were (1) (randomized) control trials and observational studies; (2) sporting codes: American, Australian and Gaelic Football, rugby union, and rugby league; (3) participants of any age or sex; (4) exercise-based, prehabilitative intervention; and (5) primary outcome was injury rate or incidence (injury risk). The exclusion criteria were (1) unavailability of full-text; and (2) article unavailable in English.
Nine studies with a total of 3517 participants were included in this review. Seven of these studies showed a significant decrease in injury risk. These studies included three sporting codes and various age groups, making it difficult to make inferences. The two highest methodological quality studies found no effect of an exercise-based intervention on injury risk.
There is evidence that exercise-based injury preventions can be beneficial in reducing injury risk in collision sports, but more studies of high methodological quality are required.
KeywordsInjury Risk Ankle Sprain American Football Rugby League Methodological Strength
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Nicola Sewry’s PhD is funded by the Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam/National Research Foundation South Africa through the Desmond Tutu Doctoral Scholarship, administered through the South Africa Vrije Universiteit Strategic Alliance (SAVUSA). Nicola Sewry also receives funding from the University of Cape Town and the Oppenheimer Memorial Trust.
Conflicts of interest
Nicola Sewry, Evert Verhagen, Mike Lambert, Willem van Mechelen, Wayne Viljoen, Clint Readhead, and James Brown declare they have no conflicts of interest relevant to the content of this review.
- 19.Cochrane Bone Joint and Muscle Trauma Group. Quality assessment tool. 2006. http://bjmt.cochrane.org/sites/bjmt.cochrane.org/files/public/uploads/Quality%20assessment%20tool.pdf. Accessed 4 April 2016.
- 20.Phillips B, Ball C, Sackett D, et al. Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine-levels of evidence. 2001. http://www.cebm.net/ocebm-levels-of-evidence/. Accessed 10 April 2016.
- 27.Finch CF, Twomey DM, Fortington LV, et al. Preventing Australian football injuries with a targeted neuromuscular control exercise programme: comparative injury rates from a training intervention delivered in a clustered randomised controlled trial. Inj Prev. 2016;22(2):123–8. doi: 10.1136/injuryprev-2015-041667.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar