To date, the prevailing evidence in the field of exercise oncology supports the safety and efficacy of resistance training to attenuate many oncology treatment-related adverse effects, such as risk for cardiovascular disease, increased fatigue, and diminished physical functioning and quality of life. Moreover, findings in the extant literature supporting the benefits of exercise for survivors of and patients with cancer have resulted in the release of exercise guidelines from several international agencies. However, despite research progression and international recognition, current exercise oncology-based exercise prescriptions remain relatively basic and underdeveloped, particularly in regards to resistance training. Recent publications have called for a more precise manipulation of training variables such as volume, intensity, and frequency (i.e., periodization), given the large heterogeneity of a cancer population, to truly optimize clinically relevant patient-reported outcomes. Indeed, increased attention to integrating fundamental principles of exercise physiology into the exercise prescription process could optimize the safety and efficacy of resistance training during cancer care. The purpose of this article is to give an overview of the current state of resistance training prescription and discuss novel methods that can contribute to improving approaches to exercise prescription. We hope this article may facilitate further evaluation of best practice regarding resistance training prescription, monitoring, and modification to ultimately optimize the efficacy of integrating resistance training as a supportive care intervention for survivors or and patients with cancer.
Resistance Training Cancer Population Exercise Prescription Training Load Training Adaptation
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
No sources of funding were used to assist in the preparation of this article.
Conflicts of interest
Ciaran Fairman, Michael Zourdos, Eric Helms, and Brian Focht have no conflicts of interest relevant to the content of this article.
Ratamess NA, Alvar BA, Evetoch TK, et al. American College of Sports Medicine position stand. Progression models in resistance training for healthy adults. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2009;41(3):687–708. doi:10.1249/MSS.0b013e3181915670.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Courneya KS, Segal RJ, Mackey JR, et al. Effects of aerobic and resistance exercise in breast cancer patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy: a multicenter randomized controlled trial. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25(28):4396–404. doi:10.1200/JCO.2006.08.2024.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Dolan LB, Gelmon K, Courneya KS, et al. Hemoglobin and aerobic fitness changes with supervised exercise training in breast cancer patients receiving chemotherapy. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev. 2010;19(11):2826–32. doi:10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-10-0521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steindorf K, Schmidt ME, Klassen O, et al. Randomized, controlled trial of resistance training in breast cancer patients receiving adjuvant radiotherapy: results on cancer-related fatigue and quality of life. Ann Oncol. 2014;25(11):2237–43. doi:10.1093/annonc/mdu374.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Bompa TO. Annual training plan. In: Bompa TO, Haff GG, editors. Periodization: theory and methodology of training. 5th ed. Champaign: Human Kinetics; 2009. p. 126–77.Google Scholar
Milanez VF, Ramos SP, Okuno NM, et al. Evidence of a non-linear dose-response relationship between training load and stress markers in elite female futsal players. J Sports Sci Med. 2014;13(1):22–9.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
Smith DJ. A framework for understanding the training process leading to elite performance. Sports Med. 2003;33(15):1103–26.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Kiely J. Periodization paradigms in the 21st century: evidence-led or tradition-driven? Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2012;7(3):242–50.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Kraemer WJ, Ratamess N, Fry AC, et al. Influence of resistance training volume and periodization on physiological and performance adaptations in collegiate women tennis players. Am J Sports Med. 2000;28(5):626–33.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Marx JO, Ratamess NA, Nindl BC, et al. Low-volume circuit versus high-volume periodized resistance training in women. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2001;33(4):635–43.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Berger AM, Higginbotham P. Correlates of fatigue during and following adjuvant breast cancer chemotherapy: a pilot study. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2000;27(9):1443–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
De Jong N, Kester ADM, Schouten HC, Abu-Saad HH, Courtens AM. Course of fatigue between two cycles of adjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer patients. Cancer Nurs. 2006;29(6):467–77.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Klemp A, Dolan C, Quiles JM, et al. Volume-equated high- and low-repetition daily undulating programming strategies produce similar hypertrophy and strength adaptations. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2016;41(7):699–705. doi:10.1139/apnm-2015-0707.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Rhea MR, Phillips WT, Burkett LN, et al. A comparison of linear and daily undulating periodized programs with equated volume and intensity for local muscular endurance. J Strength Cond Res. 2003;17(1):82–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
Buford TW, Rossi SJ, Smith DB, et al. A comparison of periodization models during nine weeks with equated volume and intensity for strength. J Strength Cond Res. 2007;21(4):1245–50. doi:10.1519/R-20446.1.PubMedGoogle Scholar
Mazzetti SA, Kraemer WJ, Volek JS, et al. The influence of direct supervision of resistance training on strength performance. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2000;32(6):1175–84.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Rhea MR, Ball SD, Phillips WT, et al. A comparison of linear and daily undulating periodized programs with equated volume and intensity for strength. J Strength Cond Res. 2002;16(2):250–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
Colquhoun RJ. Comparison of powerlifting performance in trained males using traditional and flexible daily undulating periodization. Dissertation, University of South Florida; 2015.Google Scholar
Meyerhardt JA, Heseltine D, Niedzwiecki D, et al. Impact of physical activity on cancer recurrence and survival in patients with stage III colon cancer: findings from CALGB 89803. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24(22):3535–41. doi:10.1200/JCO.2006.06.0863.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Sternfeld B, Weltzien E, Quesenberry CP, et al. Physical activity and risk of recurrence and mortality in breast cancer survivors: findings from the LACE study. Cancer Epide0miol Biomark Prev. 2009;18(1):87–95. doi:10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-08-0595.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laurent CM, Green JM, Bishop PA, et al. A practical approach to monitoring recovery: development of a perceived recovery status scale. J Strength Cond Res. 2011;25(3):620–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar