Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Assessment of Workload and its Effects on Performance and Injury in Elite Cricket Fast Bowlers

  • Systematic Review
  • Published:
Sports Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Cricket is distinctly positioned in the world of elite sports because three different formats now exist, each with characteristically different workload requirements. Fast bowlers have greater match-play workload requirements and are at greater injury risk than other positions. An update on the current cricket literature regarding fast bowling match-play physiology, workload, and injury is required to demonstrate the extent to which workload is related to performance and injury in elite fast bowlers since the introduction of 20-over cricket in 2005.

Methods

The current review examined articles published in English with data collected from 2005 onwards pertaining to in situ cricket fast bowling physiology, match play, injury, and workload. Four databases were searched using the combinations of the following keywords: ‘cricket’ and ‘bowl’, inclusive of ‘pace’, ‘fast’, ‘medium’, or ‘seam’ bowling. Articles from 2005 onwards with male participants, high-performing or elite, and fast bowlers in the game of cricket were considered for inclusion. Only workload assessments captured in a field setting were included.

Results

A total of 751 articles were identified. Exclusions included 527 duplicates, papers pre-2005, review articles, and abstracts. A further 185 articles were excluded after review of titles and abstracts that were deemed to be outside the scope of research or population. The full texts of 39 articles were reviewed, with only 17 included in this systematic review. In five articles reviewed, fast bowlers had a greater workload than other player types. Bowling workload history was reviewed in seven articles and appeared to have a complex interaction with likelihood of injury and injury type.

Conclusion

Fast bowling workload has a well recognised relationship with injury and performance. Although monitoring acute and chronic workloads of fast bowlers remains the most ideal method for identifying preparedness and injury likelihood in fast bowlers, complexities exist that make the systematic prescription of bowling workloads difficult. Advances in technology to monitor workloads may provide further insight into the intensity and workloads of fast bowlers.

PROSPERO registration number: CRD42015032466

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. CricInfo. ESPN Sports Media. http://www.espncricinfo.com. Accessed 2 Oct 2015.

  2. McNamara DJ, Gabbett TJ, Naughton G, et al. Training and competition workloads and fatigue responses of elite junior cricket players. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2013;8(5):517–26.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Dennis R, Farhart P, Goumas C, et al. Bowling workload and the risk of injury in elite cricket fast bowlers. J Sci Med Sport. 2003;6(3):359–67.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Orchard JW, James T, Portus M, et al. Fast bowlers in cricket demonstrate up to 3- to 4-week delay between high workloads and increased risk of injury. Am J Sports Med. 2009;37(6):1186–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Orchard J, James T, Kountouris A, et al. Changes to injury profile (and recommended cricket injury definitions) based on the increased frequency of Twenty20 cricket matches. Open Access J Sports Med. 2010;1:63–76.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Hulin BT, Gabbett TJ, Blanch P, et al. Spikes in acute workload are associated with increased injury risk in elite cricket fast bowlers. Br J Sports Med. 2014;48(8):708–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Orchard JW, Kountouris A, Sims KJ, et al. Change to injury profile of elite male cricketers in the T20 era. N Z J Sports Med. 2015;42(1):13–7.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Olivier B, Taljaard T, Burger E, et al. Which extrinsic and intrinsic factors are associated with non-contact injuries in adult cricket fast bowlers? Sports Med. 2016;46(1):79–101.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Brughelli M, Cronin J, Levin G, et al. Understanding change of direction ability in sport: a review of resistance training studies. Sports Med. 2008;38(12):1045–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Verhagen AP, de Vet HC, de Bie RA, et al. The Delphi list: a criteria list for quality assessment of randomized clinical trials for conducting systematic reviews developed by Delphi consensus. J Clin Epidemiol. 1998;51(12):1235–41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. PEDro. PEDro scale. 1999. http://www.pedro.org.au/english/downloads/pedro-scale/. Accessed Oct 2015.

  12. Higgins JPT, Green S. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration. 2011. http://www.handbook.cochrane.org/. Accessed Oct 2015.

  13. Orchard J, Farhart P, Kountouris A, et al. Pace bowlers in cricket with history of lumbar stress fracture have increased risk of lower limb muscle strains, particularly calf strains. Open Access J Sports Med. 2010;1:177–82.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Orchard JW, Blanch P, Paoloni J, et al. Fast bowling match workloads over 5–26 days and risk of injury in the following month. J Sci Med Sport. 2015;18(1):26–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Ranson C, Hurley R, Rugless L, et al. International cricket injury surveillance: a report of five teams competing in the ICC Cricket World Cup 2011. Br J Sports Med. 2013;47(10):637–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Orchard JW, Blanch P, Paoloni J, et al. Cricket fast bowling workload patterns as risk factors for tendon, muscle, bone and joint injuries. Br J Sports Med. 2015;49(16):1064–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Duffield R, Carney M, Karppinen S. Physiological responses and bowling performance during repeated spells of medium-fast bowling. J Sports Sci. 2009;27(1):27–35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Petersen CJ, Pyne D, Dawson B, et al. Movement patterns in cricket vary by both position and game format. J Sports Sci. 2010;28(1):45–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Petersen CJ, Pyne DB, Dawson BT, et al. Comparison of training and game demands of national level cricketers. J Strength Cond Res. 2011;25(5):1306–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Petersen CJ, Pyne DB, Portus MR, et al. Comparison of player movement patterns between 1-day and test cricket. J Strength Cond Res. 2011;25(5):1368–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. McNamara DJ, Gabbett TJ, Chapman P, et al. The validity of microsensors to automatically detect bowling events and counts in cricket fast bowlers. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2015;10(1):71–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Pyne DB, Duthie GM, Saunders PU, et al. Anthropometric and strength correlates of fast bowling speed in junior and senior cricketers. J Strength Cond Res. 2006;20(3):620–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Johnstone JA, Ford PA. Physiologic profile of professional cricketers. J Strength Cond Res. 2010;24(11):2900–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Lombard WP, Muir GA, McKune AJ. Minimal changes in indirect markers of muscle damage after an acute bout of indoor pre-season fast bowling. S Afr J Res Sport Phys Educ R. 2012;34(2):105–14.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Phillips E, Portus M, Davids K, et al. Performance accuracy and functional variability in elite and developing fast bowlers. J Sci Med Sport. 2012;15(2):182–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Petersen C, Pyne DB, Portus MJ, et al. Analysis of Twenty/20 Cricket performance during the 2008 Indian Premier League. Int J Perform Anal Sport. 2008;8(3):63–9.

    Google Scholar 

  27. McNamara DJ, Gabbett TJ, Naughton G, et al. How submarine and guided missile technology can help reduce injury and improve performance in cricket fast bowlers. Br J Sports Med. 2016;. doi:10.1136/bjsports-2015-095935.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Exercise Science, Australian Catholic University, Brisbane, QLD, Australia

    Dean J. McNamara & Tim J. Gabbett

  2. School of Human Movement Studies, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia

    Tim J. Gabbett

  3. School of Exercise Science, Australian Catholic University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia

    Geraldine Naughton

Authors
  1. Dean J. McNamara
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Tim J. Gabbett
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Geraldine Naughton
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dean J. McNamara.

Ethics declarations

Funding

No sources of funding were used to assist in the preparation of this article.

Conflict of interest

Dean McNamara, Tim Gabbett, and Geraldine Naughton declare that they have no conflicts of interest relevant to the content of this review.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

McNamara, D.J., Gabbett, T.J. & Naughton, G. Assessment of Workload and its Effects on Performance and Injury in Elite Cricket Fast Bowlers. Sports Med 47, 503–515 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-016-0588-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-016-0588-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation