Skip to main content
Log in

Designing Affordances for Health-Enhancing Physical Activity and Exercise in Sedentary Individuals

  • Current Opinion
  • Published:
Sports Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Ideas in ecological dynamics have profound implications for designing environments that offer opportunities for physical activity (PA), exercise and play in sedentary individuals. They imply how exercise scientists, health professionals, planners, designers, engineers and psychologists can collaborate in co-designing environments and playscapes that facilitate PA and exercise behaviours in different population subgroups. Here, we discuss how concepts in ecological dynamics emphasise the person–environment scale of analysis, indicating how PA environments might be (re)designed into qualitative regions of functional significance (affordances) that invite health-enhancing behaviours according to individuals’ capacities and skills (effectivities).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Gibson JJ. The ecological approach to visual perception. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Chemero A. An outline of a theory of affordances. Ecol Psychol. 2003;15(2):181–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Rietveld E, Kiverstein J. A rich landscape of affordances. Ecol Psychol. 2014;26:325–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Shaw RE, Turvey MT, Mace WM. Ecological psychology. The consequence of a commitment to realism. In: Weimer W, Palermo D, editors. Cognition and the symbolic processes, vol. 2. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc; 1982. p. 159–206.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Brymer E, Schweitzer R. The search for freedom in extreme sports: a phenomenological exploration. Psychol Sport Exerc. 2013;14(6):865–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Brymer E. Transforming adventures: why extreme sports should be included in adventure programming. In: Martin B, Wagstaff M, editors. Controversial issues in adventure programming. Champaign: Human Kinetics; 2012. p. 165–74.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Rogerson M, Brown DK, Sandercock G, et al. A comparison of four typical green exercise environments and prediction of psychological health outcomes. Perspect Public Health. 2015. doi:10.1177/1757913915589845.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Strategies to prevent obesity and other chronic diseases: the CDC guide to strategies to increase physical activity in the community. Atlanta: US Department of Health and Human Services; 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Withagen R, de Poel HJ, Araújo D, et al. Affordances can invite behavior: reconsidering the relationship between affordances and agency. New Ideas Psychol. 2012;30:250–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Riccio GE, Stoffregen TA. Affordances as constraints on the control of stance. Hum Mov Sci. 1988;7(2):256–300.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Teixeira PJ, Carraça EV, Markland D, et al. Exercise, physical activity, and self-determination theory: a systematic review. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2012;9:78.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Davids K. Athletes and sports teams as complex adaptive system: a review of implications for learning design. Rev Int Cienc Deporte. 2015;39(11):48–62.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Yeh H, Stone JA, Churchill SM, et al. Physical, psychological and emotional benefits of green physical activity: an ecological dynamics perspective. Sports Med. 2015. doi:10.1007/s40279-015-0374-z.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Brymer E, Davids K, Mallabon E. Understanding the psychological health and well-being benefits of physical activity in nature: an ecological dynamics analysis. Ecopsychology. 2014;6(3):189–97.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Brymer E, Davids K. Experiential learning as an open-ended process: an ecological dynamics perspective. J Advent Educ Outdoor Learn. 2014;14:103–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Davids K, Brymer E, Seifert L, et al. A constraints-based approach to the acquisition of expertise in outdoor adventure sports. In: Davids K, Hristovski R, Araujo D, et al., editors. Complex systems in sport. Abingdon: Routledge; 2014. p. 304–16.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Abramson D, Trninic D. Bringing forth mathematical concepts: signifying sensorimotor enactment in fields of promoted action. ZDM Math Educ. 2015;47:295–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Abrahamson D, Sánchez-García R. A call to action: towards an ecological-dynamics theory of mathematics learning, teaching, and design. In: Bartell T, Bieda K, editors. Proceedings of the 37th Conference of the North-American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (PME-NA-2015). East Lansing: Michigan State University; 2015.

  19. Jongeneel D, Withagen R, Zaal FTJM. Do children create standardized playgrounds? A study on the gap-crossing affordances of jumping stones. J Env Psychol. 2015;44:45–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Cordovil R, Araújo D, Pepping G-J, et al. An ecological stance on risk and safe behaviors in children: the role of affordances and emergent behaviors. New Ideas Psychol. 2015;36:50–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Brymer E. Risk and extreme sports: a phenomenological perspective. Ann Leis Res. 2010;13(1&2):218–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Brymer E, Schweitzer R. Extreme sports are good for your health: a phenomenological understanding of fear and anxiety in extreme sport. J Health Psychol. 2013;18(4):477–87.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Bruineberg J, Rietveld E. Self-organization, free energy minimization, and optimal grip on a field of affordances. Front Hum Neurosci. 2014;8(599):1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Voelcker-Rehage C, Godde B, Staudinger UM. Cardiovascular and coordination training differentially improve cognitive performance and neural processing in older adults. Front Hum Neurosci. 2011;5:26. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2011.00026.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Withagen R, Caljouw SR. ‘The end of sitting’: an empirical study on working in an office of the future. Sports Med. 2015. doi:10.1007/s40279-015-0448-y.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eric Brymer.

Ethics declarations

Funding

No sources of funding were used to assist in the preparation of this article.

Conflicts of interest

Keith Davids, Duarte Araújo and Eric Brymer declare that they have no conflicts of interest relevant to the content of this review.

Additional information

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Designing environments to enhance physical and psychological benefits of physical activity: A multi-disciplinary perspective.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Davids, K., Araújo, D. & Brymer, E. Designing Affordances for Health-Enhancing Physical Activity and Exercise in Sedentary Individuals. Sports Med 46, 933–938 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-016-0511-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-016-0511-3

Keywords

Navigation