Skip to main content

Standing Classrooms: Research and Lessons Learned from Around the World

Sports Medicine volume 46, pages 977–987 (2016)Cite this article

An Erratum to this article was published on 26 December 2015

Abstract

Children spend between 50 and 70 % of their time sitting while at school. Independent of physical activity levels, prolonged sitting is associated with poor health outcomes in adulthood. While there is mixed evidence of health associations among children and adolescents, public health guidelines in the USA, UK, Australia and Canada now recommend young people should break up long periods of sitting as frequently as possible. A potentially effective approach for reducing and breaking up sitting throughout the day is changing the classroom environment. This paper presents an overview of a relatively new area of research designed to reduce youth sitting time while at school by changing the classroom environment (n = 13 studies). Environmental changes included placement of height-adjustable or stand-biased standing desks/workstations with stools, chairs, exercise balls, bean bags or mats in the classroom. These 13 published studies suggest that irrespective of the approach, youth sitting time was reduced by between ~44 and 60 min/day and standing time was increased by between 18 and 55 min/day during classroom time at school. Other benefits include increased energy expenditure and the potential for improved management of students’ behaviour in the classroom. However, few large trials have been conducted, and there remains little evidence regarding the impact on children’s learning and academic achievement. Nevertheless, with an increasing demand placed on schools and teachers regarding students’ learning outcomes, strategies that integrate moving throughout the school day and that potentially enhance the learning experience and future health outcomes for young people warrant further exploration.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

49,54 €

Price includes VAT (Finland)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Notes

  1. Activity permissive in this context refers to classroom modifications such as standing desks that permit replacement of sedentary behaviour with light or moderate physical activity.

References

  1. Owen N, Bauman A, Brown W. Too much sitting: a novel and important predictor of chronic disease risk? J Sports Med. 2009;43(2):81–3.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ford ES, Caspersen CJ. Sedentary behaviour and cardiovascular disease: a review of prospective studies. Int J Epidemiol. 2012;41(5):1338–53.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Wilmot EG, Edwardson CL, Achana FA, et al. Sedentary time in adults and the association with diabetes, cardiovascular disease and death: systematic review and meta-analysis. Diabetologia. 2012;55:2895–905.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Thorp AA, Owen N, Neuhaus M, et al. Sedentary behaviors and subsequent health outcomes in adults: a systematic review of longitudinal studies, 1996–2011. Am J Prev Med. 2011;41(2):207–15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Katzmarzyk PT, Church TS, Craig CL, et al. Sitting time and mortality from all causes, cardiovascular disease, and cancer. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2009;41(5):998.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Edwardson CL, Gorely T, Davies MJ, et al. Association of sedentary behaviour with metabolic syndrome: a meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2012;7(4):e34916.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Proper KI, Singh AS, Van Mechelen W, et al. Sedentary behaviors and health outcomes among adults: a systematic review of prospective studies. Am J Prev Med. 2011;40(2):174–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Teychenne M, Ball K, Salmon J. Sedentary behavior and depression among adults: a review. Int J Behav Med. 2010;17(4):246–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Fletcher E, Leech R, McNaughton S, et al. Is the relationship between sedentary behaviour and cardiometabolic health in adolescents independent of dietary intake? A systematic review. Obes Rev. 2015;16(9):795–805.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Barnett TA, O’Loughlin J, Sabiston CM, et al. Teens and screens: the influence of screen time on adiposity in adolescents. Am J Epidemiol. 2010;172(3):255–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Chinapaw M, Proper K, Brug J, et al. Relationship between young peoples’ sedentary behaviour and biomedical health indicators: a systematic review of prospective studies. Obes Rev. 2011;12(7):e621–32.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Must A, Tybor D. Physical activity and sedentary behavior: a review of longitudinal studies of weight and adiposity in youth. Int J Obes. 2005;29:S84–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Tremblay MS, LeBlanc AG, Kho ME, et al. Systematic review of sedentary behaviour and health indicators in school-aged children and youth. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2011;8(1):98.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Hancox RJ, Milne BJ, Poulton R. Association between child and adolescent television viewing and adult health: a longitudinal birth cohort study. Lancet. 2004;364(9430):257–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Gabel L, Ridgers N, Della Gatta P, et al. Associations of sedentary time patterns and TV viewing time with inflammatory and endothelial function biomarkers in children. Pediatr Obes. 2015. doi:10.1111/ijpo.12045 (Epub 2015 Jun 19).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Iannotti RJ, Janssen I, Haug E, et al. Interrelationships of adolescent physical activity, screen-based sedentary behaviour, and social and psychological health. Int J Public Health. 2009;54(2):191–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Hamer M, Stamatakis E, Mishra G. Psychological distress, television viewing, and physical activity in children aged 4 to 12 years. Pediatrics. 2009;123(5):1263–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Sigfsdttir ID, Allegrante JP. Adolescent health behavior, contentment in school, and academic achievement. Am J Health Behav. 2009;33(1):69–79.

    Google Scholar 

  19. LeBlanc AG, Spence JC, Carson V, et al. Systematic review of sedentary behaviour and health indicators in the early years (aged 0–4 years). Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2012;37(4):753–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Melkevik O, Torsheim T, Iannotti RJ, et al. Research is spending time in screen-based sedentary behaviors associated with less physical activity: a cross national investigation. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2010;7(46):1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Biddle SJ, Gorely T, Marshall SJ, et al. Physical activity and sedentary behaviours in youth: issues and controvorsies. J R Soc Promot Health. 2004;124(1):29–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Hamer M, Stamatakis E, Steptoe A. Effects of substituting sedentary time with physical activity on metabolic risk. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2014;46(10):1946–50.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Pate RR, Mitchell JA, Byun W, et al. Sedentary behaviour in youth. Br J Sports Med. 2011;45(11):906–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Biddle SJH, Pearson N, Ross GM, et al. Tracking of sedentary behaviours of young people: a systematic review. Prev Med. 2010;51(5):345–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Carson V, Ridgers ND, Howard BJ, et al. Light-intensity physical activity and cardiometabolic biomarkers in US adolescents. PLoS One. 2013;8(8):e71417.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Sallis JF, Cervero RB, Ascher W, et al. An ecological approach to creating active living communities. Annu Rev Public Health. 2006;27:297–322.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Lanningham-Foster L, Foster RC, McCrady SK, et al. Changing the school environment to increase physical activity in children. Obesity. 2008;16:1849–53.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Aminian S, Duncan S, White K, et al. Using the ActivPAL monitor to quantify time spent sitting, standing and stepping at school: a one-day snapshot. J Sci Res Rep. 2014;3(6):866–73. http://www.sciencedomain.org/abstract.php?iid=417&id=22&aid=3588#.U03y-PmSySo.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Ridgers ND, Salmon J, Ridley K, et al. Agreement between activPAL and ActiGraph for assessing children’s sedentary time. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2012;9:15. doi:10.1186/479-5868-9-15.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Clemes S, Barber S, Bingham D, et al. Reducing children’s classroom sitting time using sit-to-stand desks: findings from pilot studies in UK and Australian primary schools. J Public Health. 2015. doi:10.1093/pubmed/fdv084 (Epub 2015 Jun 14, pii: fdv084)

  31. Benden M, Zhao H, Schneider D. A 2-year evaluation of a high school standing desk intervention to reduce sedentary behavior in us children. In: Symposium: Restructuring the classroom environment to reduce sedentary behaviour: evidence from primary and secondary school interventions across the globe. International Society of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity; 3–6 Jun 2015; Edinburgh. Edinburgh: International Society of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity; 2015. p. 115.

  32. Hinckson E, Aminian S, Norris S, et al. Exploring the behavioural, health, learning and social effects of a dynamic classroom environment in New Zealand primary school children. In: Symposium: Restructuring the classroom environment to reduce sedentary behaviour: evidence from primary and secondary school interventions across the globe. International Society of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity; 3–6 Jun 2015; Edinburgh. Edinburgh: International Society of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity; 2015. p. 115.

  33. Aminian S, Hinckson E, Steward T. Modifying the classroom environment to reduce sitting and increase standing time in children. Build Res Inf. 2015;43(5):631–45. doi:10.1080/09613218.2015.1058093.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Hinckson EA, Aminian S, Ikeda E, et al. Acceptability of standing workstations in elementary schools: a pilot study. Prev Med. 2013;56(1):82–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Benden ME, Blake JJ, Wendel ML, et al. The impact of stand-biased desks in classrooms on calorie expenditure in children. Am J Public Health. 2011;101(8):1433–6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Benden ME, Wendel ML, Jeffrey CE, et al. Within-subjects analysis of the effects of a stand-biased classroom intervention on energy expenditure. J Exerc Physiol Online. 2012;15(2):9–19.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Dornhecker M, Blake JJ, Benden M, et al. The effect of stand-biased desks on academic engagement: an exploratory study. Int J Health Prom Educ. 2015;53(5):271–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Barber S, Clemes S, Bingham D, et al. The use of sit-to-stand desks to reduce classroom sitting: evidence from a diverse sample of children from the UK and Australia. In: Symposium: Restructuring the classroom environment to reduce sedentary behaviour: evidence from primary and secondary school interventions across the globe. International Society of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity; 3–6 Jun 2015; Edinburgh. Edinburgh: International Society of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity; 2015. p. 115.

  39. Benden ME, Zhao H, Jeffrey CE, et al. The evaluation of the impact of a stand-biased desk on energy expenditure and physical activity for elementary school students. Int J Env Res Public Health. 2014;11(9):9361–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Blake JJ, Benden ME, Wendel ML. Using stand/sit workstations in classrooms: lessons learned from a pilot study in Texas. J Public Health Manag Pract. 2012;18(5):412–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Benden M, Pickens A, Shipp E, et al. Evaluating a school based childhood obesity intervention for posture and comfort. Health (N Y). 2013;5 (8A3):54–60.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Koepp GA, Snedden BJ, Flynn L, et al. Feasibility analysis of standing desks for sixth graders. Infant Child Adolesc Nutr. 2012;4(2):89–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Koskelo R, Vuorikari K, Hanninen O. Sitting and standing postures are corrected by adjustable furniture with lowered muscle tension in high-school students. Ergonomics. 2007;50(10):1643–56.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Cardon G, De Clercq D, De Bourdeaudhuij I, et al. Sitting habits in elementary school children: a traditional versus a “Moving school”. Patient Educ Couns. 2004;54(2):133–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Salmon J, Sudholz B, Dunstan D, et al. Up and Learn! A pilot study examining the feasibility of height-adjustable desks in an Australian secondary school classroom. In: Symposium: Restructuring the classroom environment to reduce sedentary behaviour: evidence from primary and secondary school interventions across the globe. International Society of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity; 3–6 Jun 2015; Edinburgh. Edinburgh: International Society of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity; 2015. p. 115.

  46. Smith T. The ergonomics of learning: educational design and learning performance. Ergonomics. 2007;50(10):1530–46.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Trevelyan FC, Legg SJ. Back pain in school children—where to from here? Appl Ergon. 2006;37(1):45–54.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Grimes P, Legg SJ. Musculoskeletal disorders (MSD) in school students as a risk factor for adult MSD: a review of the multiple factors affecting posture, comfort and health in classroom environments. J Hum Env Syst. 2004;7(1):1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Harreby M, Nygaard B, Jessen T, et al. Risk factors for low back pain in a cohort of 1389 Danish school children: an epidemiologic study. Eur Spine J. 1999;8(6):444–50.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Troussier B, Davoine P, De Gaudemaris R, et al. Back pain in school children. A study among 1178 pupils. Scand J Rehabil Med. 1994;26(3):143.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Prel G, Lagadec B, Lempereur J. Clinical observation of a child sitting dynamic. In: Troussier B, Phelip X, editors. Le dos de l’enfant et de l’adolescent et la prevention des lombalgies. Paris: Masson; 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Salminen J. The adolescent back: a field study of 370 Finnish school children. Acta Paediatr Scand Suppl. 1984;315:1–122.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Saarni LA, Rimpelä AH, Nummi TH, et al. Do ergonomically designed school workstations decrease musculoskeletal symptoms in children? A 26-month prospective follow-up study. Appl Ergon. 2009;40(3):491–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Trevelyan FC, Legg SJ. The prevalence and characteristics of back pain among schoolchildren in New Zealand. Ergonomics. 2010;53(12):1455–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Opdenakker M-C, Van Damme J. Teacher characteristics and teaching styles as effectiveness enhancing factors of classroom practice. Teach Teach Educ. 2006;22(1):1–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Perry KE, Donohue KM, Weinstein RS. Teaching practices and the promotion of achievement and adjustment in first grade. J Sch Psychol. 2007;45(3):269–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Walker JM. Looking at teacher practices through the lens of parenting style. J Exp Educ. 2008;76(2):218–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Kiuru N, Aunola K, Torppa M, et al. The role of parenting styles and teacher interactional styles in children’s reading and spelling development. J Sch Psychol. 2012;50(6):799–823.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Kozey-Keadle S, Libertine A, Lyden K, et al. Validation of wearable monitors for assessing sedentary behavior. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2011;43(8):1561–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Benden M, Pickens A, Shipp E, et al. Evaluating a school based childhood obesity intervention for posture and comfort. Health (N Y). 2013;5(8A3):54-60.

    Google Scholar 

  61. Salmon J, Arundell L, Hume C, et al. A cluster-randomized controlled trial to reduce sedentary behavior and promote physical activity and health of 8–9 year olds: the Transform-Us! Study. BMC Public Health. 2011;11(1):759.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  62. Michie S, Richardson M, Johnston M, et al. The behavior change technique taxonomy (v1) of 93 hierarchically clustered techniques: building an international consensus for the reporting of behavior change interventions. Ann Behav Med. 2013;46(1):81–95.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Auckland University of Technology, Centre for Child Health Research, National Institute of Public and Mental Health, Auckland, New Zealand

    Erica Hinckson & Saeideh Aminian

  2. Centre for Physical Activity and Nutrition Research, Deakin University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia

    Jo Salmon, Bronwyn Sudholz & Nicola D. Ridgers

  3. Ergonomics Centre, Environmental and Occupational Health, Texas A&M, Austin, TX, USA

    Mark Benden

  4. School of Sport, Exercise and Health Sciences, Loughborough University, Loughborough, UK

    Stacey A. Clemes

  5. Bradford Institute for Health Research, Bradford Teaching Hospitals Foundation Trust, Bradford, UK

    Sally E. Barber

Authors
  1. Erica Hinckson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jo Salmon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Mark Benden
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Stacey A. Clemes
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Bronwyn Sudholz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Sally E. Barber
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Saeideh Aminian
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Nicola D. Ridgers
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Erica Hinckson.

Ethics declarations

Funding

Erica Hinckson is supported by the Auckland University of Technology Strategic Research Investment Funding. Jo Salmon is supported by a National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) of Australia Principal Research Fellowship (APP1026216). Bronwyn Sudholz is supported by a Postdoctoral Fellowship from an NHMRC Centre for Research Excellence (APP1057608). Sally Barber is part of the Healthy Children Healthy Families theme of the National Institute for Health Research Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care (NIHR CLAHRC) Yorkshire and Humber. No other sources of funding were used to assist in the preparation of this article.

Conflicts of interest

Mark Benden declares a financial conflict of interest since his US-patented designs have been licensed by Texas A&M University to Stand2Learn LLC, and those designs have been present on several models of desks purchased for his studies. Erica Hinckson, Jo Salmon, Stacy Clemes, Bronwyn Sudholz, Sally Barber, Saeideh Aminian and Nicky Ridgers declare that they have no conflicts of interest relevant to the content of this article.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hinckson, E., Salmon, J., Benden, M. et al. Standing Classrooms: Research and Lessons Learned from Around the World. Sports Med 46, 977–987 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-015-0436-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-015-0436-2

Keywords

  • Sedentary Behaviour
  • Classroom Environment
  • Wireless Charge
  • Collaborative Workspace
  • Nordic Musculoskeletal Questionnaire