Abstract
The present review introduces innovative concepts of training periodization and summarizes a large body of findings characterizing their potential benefits and possible limitations. Evidence-based analysis of the traditional periodization model led to elaboration of alternative versions of athletic preparation. These alternative versions postulated the superiority of training programs with a high concentration of selected workloads compared with traditionally designed plans directed at the concurrent development of many athletic abilities at low/medium workload concentration. The training cycles of highly concentrated specialized workloads were coined “training blocks” by experts and practitioners; correspondingly, the alternative versions were termed “block periodized (BP) preparation systems” by their presenters. Ultimately, two BP training models were proposed: a concentrated unidirectional training model (CU) and a multi-targeted BP approach to athletes’ preparation. The first innovative version postulated administration of highly concentrated training means for enhancement of one leading fitness component, whereas the second version proposed the development of many targeted abilities within sequenced block mesocycles containing a minimal number of compatible training modalities. Both versions differ in their methodological background, duration and content of training blocks, possibilities of providing multi-peak performances, and applicability to various sports. In recent decades, many studies have evaluated the effects of both BP training versions in different sports. Examination of the training effects producing by the CU model in combat and team sports has found significant gains in various fitness estimates but not in sport-specific performances. Similarly, utilization of a CU program by elite swimmers did not lead to substantial enhancement of their peak performances. In contrast, studies of multi-targeted BP training programs have revealed their distinct superiority compared with traditional preparation in endurance, team, and dual sports, and strength/power training and recreational athletes (28 studies). It is suggested that the CU training strategy suits athletic disciplines demanding one fitness component like explosive strength in jumping performances. Unlike this limitation, the multi-targeted BP system prompted a beneficial increase of specific preparedness in sports and disciplines in which peak performances require the application of many targeted athletic abilities.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Kotov BA. Olympic sport. Guidelines for track and field. Sankt Petersburg: Majtov Publisher; 1916 (In Russian).
Matveyev LP. Problem of periodization the sport training. Moscow: FiS Publisher; 1964 (In Russian).
Issurin V, Kaverin V. Planning and design of annual preparation cycle in canoe-kayak paddling. In: Samsonov EB, Kaverin VF, editors. Grebnoj sport (rowing, canoeing, kayaking). Moscow: FiS Publisher; 1985. pp. 25–29 (In Russian).
Verkhoshansky YV. Programming and organization of training process. Moscow: FiS Publisher; 1985 (In Russian).
Verkhoshansky YV. Bases of special physical preparation of athletes. Moscow: FiS Publisher; 1988 (In Russian).
Bondarchuk AP. Training of track and field athletes. Kiev: Health Publisher (Zdorovie); 1986 (In Russian).
Pyne DB, Touretski G. An analysis of the training of Olympic sprint champion Alexandre Popov. Aust Swim Coach. 1993;10(5):5–14.
Touretski G. Preparation of sprint events: ASCTA Convention. Canberra: Australian Institute of Sport; 1998.
Verkhoshansky YV. Long-term delayed training effect of strength workloads. Moscow Theory Pract Phys Cult. 1983;5:5–8 (In Russian).
Verkhoshansky YV. Special strength training. A practical manual for coaches. Muskegon: Ultimate Athlete Concepts; 2006.
Zatsiorsky VM. Science and practice of strength training. Champaign: Human Kinetics; 1995.
Verkhoshansky YV, Siff M. Supertraining. 7th ed. Muskegon: Ultimate Athlete Concepts; 2009.
Villani R, Gesuale D. Comparative analysis of the systems of classic and block periodization in the shoot boxing. Salzburg: 8th Annual Congress of the European College of Sport Science; 2003. p. 233.
Moreira A, Olivera PR, Okano AH, et al. Dynamics of power measures alterations and the posterior long-lasting training effect on basketball players submitted to the block training system. Rev Bras Med Esporte. 2004;10(4):251–7.
De Souza J, Gomes AC, Leme L, et al. Changes in metabolic and motor performance variables induced by training in handball players. Rev Bras Med Esporte. 2006;12(3):118–22.
Campeiz JM, de Oliveira PR. Effects of concentrated charges of strength training on anaerobic variables and body composition of professional soccer players. J Sports Sci Med. 2007;(Suppl 10):172.
Da Silva Marinho P. Block periodization systems: main training effects on the performance of high level swimmers. PhD Thesis. Universidade Estadual de Campinas, 2008.
Issurin V, Lustig G. Klassification, Dauer und praktische Komponenten der Resteffekte von Training. Leistungsport. 2004;34(3):55–9.
Viru A. Adaptation in sports training. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 1995.
Counsilman BE, Counsilman J. The residual effects of training. J Swim Res. 1991;7:5–12.
Issurin V. Block periodization versus traditional training theory: a review. J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 2008;48(1):65–75.
Bernard C. Introduction à l’étude de la médecine expérimentale. Paris: 1865.
Cannon W. Organization of physiological homeostasis. Physiol Rev. 1929;9:399–431.
Selye H. The physiology and pathology of exposure to stress. Montreal: ACTA Inc., Medical Publishers; 1950.
Issurin V. Generalized training effects induced by athleic preparation. A review. J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 2009;49:333–45.
Issurin V. New horizons for the methodology and physiology of training periodization. Sports Med. 2010;40(3):189–206.
Issurin V, Sharobajko I, Timofeyev V, et al. Particularities of annual preparation of top-level canoe-kayak paddlers during 1984–1988 Olympic cycle. Scientific report. Leningrad Research Institute for Physical Culture, 1988 (In Russian).
Garcia-Pallares J, Garcia-Fernandez M, Sanchez-Medina L, et al. Performance changes in world-class kayakers following two different training periodization models. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2010;110:99–107.
Breil FA, Weber SN, Koller S, et al. Block training periodization in alpine skiing: effect of 11-day HIT on VO2max and performance. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2010;109:1077–86.
Rønnestad BR, Hansen J, Ellefsen S. Block periodization of high-intensity aerobic intervals provides superior training effects in trained cyclists. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2012;24:34–42.
Støren O, Sanda SB, Haave M, et al. Improved VO2max and time trial performance with more high aerobic intensity interval training and reduced training volume: a case study on an elite national cyclist. J Strength Cond Res. 2011;26(10):2705–11.
Bakken TA. Effects of block periodization training versus traditional periodization training in trained cross country skiers. Master Thesis; Liliehammer University College, 2013.
Alecu A. Importance of using periodization in blocks in quality development in kayak biomotrice. Marathon 2013;V(2):127–33.
Rønnestad BR, Ellefsen S, Nygaard H, et al. Effects of 12 weeks of block periodization on performance and performance indices in well-trained cyclists. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2014;24(2):327–35.
Klementiev I. Training program of long standing technical improvement for achievement and maintenance of outstanding sportsmanship. PhD dissertation. Riga: Latvian Sport Pedagogical Academy; 1993 (In Russian, Abstract in English).
Shantarovich VV, Narskin AG, Shantarovich AV. Block training system within Olympic preparation cycle of top-level canoe-kayak paddlers. In: Bondar AI, editor. Actual problems of high-performance sport towards the XXIX Beijing Olympic Games. Minsk: Research Sport Institute of Belarus; 2006. pp. 113–7 (In Russian).
Radovanovic D, Rakovic A, Ignatovic A, et al. Influence of block periodization on adaptation in well-trained race walkers. J Sport Sci Med (Suppl.). 2009;2009(11):136.
Stolen T, Chamari K, Castagna C, et al. Physiology of soccer: an update. Sports Med. 2005;35:501–36.
Porta J, Sanz D. Periodization in top level men’s tennis. ITF. Coach Sport Sci Rev. 2005;36:12–3.
Mallo J. Effect of block periodization on performance in competition in a soccer team during four consecutive seasons: a case study. Intern J Perform Analysis Sport. 2011;11(3):476–85.
Mallo J. Effect of block periodization on physical fitness during a competitive soccer season. Intern J Perform Anal Sport. 2012;12(1):64–74.
Wahl P, Güldner M, Mester J. Effects and sustainability of a 13-day high-intensity shock microcycle in soccer. J Sports Sci Med. 2014;13:259–65.
Chadd N. An approach to the periodization of training during the in-season for team sports. UKSCA. 2010;18:5–10.
Iovanovic M. Physical preparation for soccer. Belgrade: Special edition; 2011.
Herrick A, Stone W. The effects of periodization versus progressive resistance exercise on upper and lower body strength in women. J Strength Cond Res. 1996;10(2):72–6.
Hartmann H, Bob A, Wirth K, et al. Effects of different periodization models on rate of force development and power ability of the upper extremity. J Strength Cond Res. 2009;23(7):1921–32.
Painter K, Haff G, Ramsey M, et al. Strength gains: block vs. daily undulating periodization weight training among track and field athletes. Intern J Sports Phys Performance. 2012;7(2):161–9.
Bartolomei S, Hoffman JR, Merni F, et al. A comparison of traditional and block periodized strength training programs in trained athletes. J Strength Cond Res. 2014;28(4):990–7.
Poliquin C. Five steps to increasing the effectiveness of your strength training program. NSCA J. 1988;10(3):34–9.
Naspinsky G. EFS classic: a practical guide for implementation block periodization for powerlifting. Articles elitefts.com., 2010.
Smith J. The perfect program: block periodization for the masses: 12 weeks to monumental gains in mass and strength. Joe Weider’s Muscle Fitness. 2011;72(7):82–92.
Sikorski W. New approach to preparation of elite judo athletes to main competition. J Combat Sports Martial Arts. 2011;2(1):57–60.
National Osteoporosis Foundation. America’s bone health: the state of osteoporosis and low bone mass in our nation. Washington, DC: National Osteoporosis Foundation; 2002.
Vanni A, Meyer F, da Veiga A, et al. Comparison of the effects of two resistance training regimes on muscular and bone responses in postmenopausal women. Osteoporosis Int. 2010;21(9):1537–44.
Kemmler W, Bebenek M, von Stengel S, et al. Effect of block-periodized exercise training on bone and coronary heart disease risk factors in early post-menopausal women: a randomized controlled study. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2011;23(1):121–9.
Vorobiov AN. Weightlifting. Essays of physiology and athletic training. Moscow: FiS Publisher; 1977 (In Russian).
Tschiene P. Die Prioritat des biologischen Aspects in der “Theorie des Trainings”. Leistungssport. 1991;6:5–9.
Zanon S. Die alte “Theorie des Trainings” in der Kritik. Leistungssport. 1997;3:18–9.
Bondarchuk AP. Transfer of training in sports. Muskegon: Ultimate Training Concepts; 2007.
Issurin V. Block periodization: breakthrough in sport training. Muskegon: Ultimate Training Concepts; 2008.
Acknowledgments
The author is grateful to Mr. Mike Garmise for editing the English text.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Funding
No funding was used to assist in the preparation of this review.
Conflict of interest
The author has no conflict of interest that are relevant to the content of this review.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Issurin, V.B. Benefits and Limitations of Block Periodized Training Approaches to Athletes’ Preparation: A Review. Sports Med 46, 329–338 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-015-0425-5
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-015-0425-5