The Influence of Head Impact Threshold for Reporting Data in Contact and Collision Sports: Systematic Review and Original Data Analysis
- 916 Downloads
Head impacts and resulting head accelerations cause concussive injuries. There is no standard for reporting head impact data in sports to enable comparison between studies.
The aim was to outline methods for reporting head impact acceleration data in sport and the effect of the acceleration thresholds on the number of impacts reported.
A systematic review of accelerometer systems utilised to report head impact data in sport was conducted. The effect of using different thresholds on a set of impact data from 38 amateur senior rugby players in New Zealand over a competition season was calculated.
Of the 52 studies identified, 42 % reported impacts using a >10-g threshold, where g is the acceleration of gravity. Studies reported descriptive statistics as mean ± standard deviation, median, 25th to 75th interquartile range, and 95th percentile. Application of the varied impact thresholds to the New Zealand data set resulted in 20,687 impacts of >10 g, 11,459 (45 % less) impacts of >15 g, and 4024 (81 % less) impacts of >30 g.
Linear and angular raw data were most frequently reported. Metrics combining raw data may be more useful; however, validity of the metrics has not been adequately addressed for sport. Differing data collection methods and descriptive statistics for reporting head impacts in sports limit inter-study comparisons. Consensus on data analysis methods for sports impact assessment is needed, including thresholds. Based on the available data, the 10-g threshold is the most commonly reported impact threshold and should be reported as the median with 25th and 75th interquartile ranges as the data are non-normally distributed. Validation studies are required to determine the best threshold and metrics for impact acceleration data collection in sport.
Until in-field validation studies are completed, it is recommended that head impact data should be reported as median and interquartile ranges using the 10-g impact threshold.
KeywordsHead Impact Rotational Acceleration Rugby Union Head Injury Criterion Concussive Injury
The authors declare that there are no competing interests associated with the research contained within this manuscript. No sources of funding were utilised in conducting this study. According to the definition given by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE), the authors listed above qualify for authorship on the basis of making one or more of the substantial contributions to the intellectual content of the manuscript.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflicts of interest
Doug King, Patria Hume, Conor Gissane, Matt Brughelli and Trevor Clark declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- 3.McCrory P, Meeuwisse W, Aubry M, et al. Consensus statement on concussion in sport: the 4th International conference on concussion in sport held in Zurich, November 2012. Br J Sports Med. 2013;47(5):250–8.Google Scholar
- 9.Baumgartner D, Willinger R, Shewchenko N, et al. Tolerance limits for mild traumatic brain injury derived from numerical head impact replication. In: Proceedings of the IRCOBI conference on the biomechanics of impact; 2001 Oct 10–12; Isle of Man (UK): IRCOBI; 2001 Oct 10–12. p. 353–5.Google Scholar
- 12.Zhang L, Yang J, King A. A proposed injury threshold for mild traumatic brain injury. J Biomed Eng. 2004;126(2):226–36.Google Scholar
- 14.Newman J, Barr C, Beusenberg M, et al. A new biomechanical assessment of mild traumatic brain injury. Part 2—results and conclusions. International IRCOBI conference on the biomechanics of impacts 2000; 2000; Montpellier (France); 2000. p. 223–33.Google Scholar
- 18.Viano DC, Casson IR, Pellman EJ. Concussion in professional football: biomechanics of the struck player - part 14. Neurosurgery. 2007;61(2):313-27; discussion 27-28.Google Scholar
- 22.Rowson S, Brolinson G, Goforth M, et al. Linear and angular head acceleration measurements in collegiate football. J Biomed Eng. 2009;131(061016):1–7.Google Scholar
- 44.Erlander D, Kutner K, Barth J, et al. Neuropsychology of sports-related head injury: dementia pugilistica to post concussion syndrome. Clin Neurophysiol. 1999;13(2):193–209.Google Scholar
- 59.Allen M, Weir-Jones I, Eng P, et al. Acceleration perturbations of daily living: a comparison to ‘whiplash’. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1994;19(11):1285–90.Google Scholar
- 64.Gadd C. Use of a weighted impulse criterion for establishing injury hazard. In: Proceedings of the 10th STAPP Car rash conference, Society of Automotive Engineers; New York; 1966. p. 164–74.Google Scholar
- 66.Lewis E. Head injury and protection. In: Rainford D, Gradwell D, editors. Ernsting’s aviation medicine. Boca Ratoa: CRC Press; 2006. p. 179–88.Google Scholar
- 67.McLean A, Anderson W. Biomechanics of closed head injury. In: Reilly P, Bullock R, editors. Head injury. London: Chapman & Hall; 1997. p. 25–37.Google Scholar
- 68.Versace J. A review of the severity index. In: 15th Stapp Car Crash Conference, Society of Automotive Engineers; 1971:771–96.Google Scholar
- 69.Kleinberger M, Sun E, Eppinger R, et al. Development of improved injury criteria for the assessment of advanced automotive restraint systems: NHTSA; 1998.Google Scholar
- 70.King A, Yang K, Zhang L, et al. Is head injury caused by linear or angular acceleration? IRCOBI conference. Lisbon, Portugal; 2003. p. 1–12.Google Scholar
- 72.Newman J. A generalized acceleration model for brain injury threshold (GAMBIT). International IRCOBI conference on the biomechanics of impacts 1986. Zurich (Switzerland); 1986. p. 121–31.Google Scholar
- 80.Gwin J, Chu J, McAllister T, et al. In situ measures of head impact acceleration in NCAA division I men’s Ice Hockey: implications for ASTM F1045 and other ice hockey helmet standards. J ATSM Int. 2009;6(6):101848.Google Scholar
- 83.Mihalik J, Guskiewicz K, Marshall S, et al. Head impact biomechanics in youth hockey: comparisons across playing position, event types, and impact locations. J Biomed Eng. 2012;40(1):141–9.Google Scholar
- 108.Denny-Brown D, Russell W. Experimental cerebral concussion. Brain. 1940;64(2–3):93–164.Google Scholar
- 110.Miller J, Adamson G, Pink M, et al. Comparison of preseason, midseason, and postseason neurocognitive scores in uninjured collegiate football players. Am J Sports Med. 2007, 2007; 35(8):1284–8.Google Scholar
- 115.Ommaya A. Biomechanics of head injuries: experimental aspects. In: Nuham A, Melvin J, editors. Biomechanics of trauma. Norwalk: Appleton-Century-Crofts; 1985. p. 245–69.Google Scholar
- 118.Shreiber D, Bain A, Meaney D. In vivo thresholds for mechanical injury to the blood-brain barrier. In: Procedings of the 41st Stapp Car Crash Conference. Lake Buena Vista, Florida (USA); 1997. p. 227–91.Google Scholar
- 121.King A, Yang K, Zhang L, et al. Is rotational acceleration more injurious to the brain than linear acceleration? In: Hwang NC, Woo S-Y, editors. Frontiers in biomedical engineering. USA: Springer; 2004. p. 135–47.Google Scholar
- 124.Mecham M, Greenwald R, Macintyre J, et al. Incidence and severity of head impact during freestyle aerial ski jumping. J App Biomech. 1999;15(1):27–35.Google Scholar
- 126.Fenner H, Thomas D, Gennarelli T, et al. Final report of workshop on criterion for head injury in helmet standards. Milwaukee Wisconsin: Medical College of Wisconsin/Snell Memorial Foundation; 2005.Google Scholar
- 127.World Health Organisation. Review of physical activity surveillance data sources in European Union Member States. Report No. 6. Copenhagen, Denmark: WHO Regional Office for Europe; 2010.Google Scholar